{"id":46731,"date":"2016-05-11T14:34:52","date_gmt":"2016-05-11T09:04:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=46731"},"modified":"2016-06-27T17:56:33","modified_gmt":"2016-06-27T12:26:33","slug":"cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In a case where the assessment order for actor Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income in the year 2001-2002 was in question, the bench of Ranjan Gogoi and P.C. Pant, JJ held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) is empowered to revise the said order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as making a claim which would prima facie disclose that the expenses in respect of which deduction has been claimed has been incurred and thereafter abandoning\/withdrawing the same gives rise to the necessity of further enquiry in the interest of the Revenue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The assessee, in his earlier stand had stated that the expenses incurred were for security purposes and that payments have been made out of cash balances available and later, by a re-revised return, he withdrew his claims, acting upon which, the Assessing Officer abandoned the enquiry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Explaining the law on revisional power of CIT, the Court said that There can be no doubt that so long as the view taken by the Assessing Officer is a possible view the same ought not to be interfered with by the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act merely on the ground that there is another possible view of the matter. Permitting exercise of revisional power in a situation where two views are possible would really amount to conferring some kind of an appellate power in the revisional authority which is a course of action that must be desisted from. However, the Court said that the present case was an exceptional one and required a revision as the matter had not been investigated by the Assessing Officer and that the notice issued under Section 69-C of the Act could not have been simply dropped on the ground that the claim has been withdrawn. [Commissioner of Income Tax v. Amitabh Bachchan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_SC_484\">2016 SCC OnLine SC 484<\/a>, decided on 11.05.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In a case where the assessment order for actor Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income in the year 2001-2002 was in question, the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[5281,5291,5301,2592],"class_list":["post-46731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-amitabh-bachchan","tag-cit","tag-income","tag-Income_Tax"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In a case where the assessment order for actor Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income in the year 2001-2002 was in question, the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":324,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Amitabh Bachchan\",\"CIT\",\"income\",\"Income Tax\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/\",\"name\":\"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2016\\\/05\\\/11\\\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002","og_description":"Supreme Court: In a case where the assessment order for actor Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income in the year 2001-2002 was in question, the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002","datePublished":"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/"},"wordCount":324,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","keywords":["Amitabh Bachchan","CIT","income","Income Tax"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/","name":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-05-11T09:04:52+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-27T12:26:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/11\/cit-allowed-to-revise-the-assessment-order-for-amitabh-bachchans-income-for-the-year-2001-2002\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CIT allowed to revise the assessment order for Amitabh Bachchan\u2019s income for the year 2001-2002"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/10\/interest-free-funds-not-kept-in-separate-account-can-proportionate-disallowance-on-interest-under-section-14a-of-it-act-be-allowed-sc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":0},"title":"Interest free funds not kept in separate account. Can proportionate disallowance on interest under Section 14A of IT Act be allowed? SC explains","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026 in taxation regime, there is no room for presumption and nothing can be taken to be implied.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/11\/revenue-can-bring-expenditure-incurred-earlier-years-taxed-subsequent-years-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":1},"title":"Can revenue bring expenditure incurred in earlier years to be taxed in subsequent years? ITAT answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After examining the expenses payable and the detailed order of the CIT,the ITAT held that the CIT has correctly examined the invoices, period and purpose for the expenses which have not been paid for the last six years","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"income tax appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289169,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/11\/supreme-court-overrules-malabar-industrial-co-ltd-section-263-income-tax-act-states-that-erroneous-order-passed-by-assessing-officer-being-prejudice-to-revenue-department-was-revisable-by-cit-legal\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":2},"title":"CIT can revise erroneous order by Assessing Officer causing prejudice to revenue; Supreme Court overrules it&#8217;s 2000 verdict","author":"Editor","date":"April 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court stated that the erroneous assessment order had resulted in loss of the Revenue in the form of tax. Thus, the High Court had committed a very serious error in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner passed in exercise of powers under Section 263 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Erroneous order by Assessing Officer","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1079.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1079.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1079.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1079.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/11\/itat-expenses-incurred-for-conducting-puja-before-transporting-goods-are-deductible\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":3},"title":"ITAT| Expenses incurred for conducting Puja before transporting goods are deductible","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT Kolkata: \u00a0In a case relating to assessment of income tax of the assessee running transport business involving plying of trucks in the North East States especially in Assam, Meghalaya, and Mizoram, Judicial Member A. T. Varkey, has held that the expenses incurred by the assessee for puja conducted by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/26\/itat-can-exempted-income-which-is-not-part-of-the-total-income-alone-be-considered-for-disallowance-u-s-14a-of-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":4},"title":"ITAT| Can exempted income which is not part of the total income alone be considered for disallowance u\/s 14A of Income Tax Act?","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akshat Malpani\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/whether-expenditure-incurred-on-replacements-of-old-truck-bodies-will-be-treated-revenue-expenditure-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":46731,"position":5},"title":"Whether expenditure incurred on replacements of old truck bodies will be treated as revenue expenditure? ITAT answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata: The Bench of Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial member) and Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member) held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee as such on replacement of wooden body of trucks has to be allowed fully against the income of the assessee in the current year. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46731\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}