{"id":45861,"date":"2016-05-05T14:30:44","date_gmt":"2016-05-05T09:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=45861"},"modified":"2016-06-27T17:52:40","modified_gmt":"2016-06-27T12:22:40","slug":"world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Canada<\/strong>: While deciding a matter the Court has upheld the immunity status and independence of international organizations by rejecting an attempt by a group of accused individuals to compel personnel of the World Bank Group to appear in court and produce various documents. The Court ruled unanimously that documents from World Bank Group investigations remain immune from document production requests that are part of domestic court proceedings, even if information related to those documents has been shared with and relied upon by domestic law enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0decision arose in the context of a criminal proceeding under the\u00a0Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act<\/em>\u00a0where four parties are charged with offences as a result of an investigation triggered by a series of tips. The tips were received by a branch of the World Bank Group \u2014 a third party to the prosecutions \u2014 responsible for investigating allegations of fraud, corruption, and collusion with respect to projects financed by the World Bank Group. Wiretap authorizations were subsequently granted to the RCMP on the basis of information provided by the World Bank Group. In order to challenge the wiretap authorizations, the respondents sought to examine two senior investigators at the World Bank Group and compel production of documents in their possession by way of subpoena. Neither of the investigators complied with the subpoenas, causing the accused parties to bring this application for an order requiring production of the requested documents and for validation of the subpoenas. No representative of the World Bank Group appeared at the application hearing, nor was any evidence filed by it, leaving the Crown prosecutor to assert immunity on its behalf. The trial judge ultimately ordered production of various documents in the hands of the World Bank Group and validated the subpoenas. Since the decision affected the rights of a third party to the criminal proceedings, the decision was appealed by the World Bank Group, with leave, directly to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

The bench writing through Moldaver and C\u00f4t\u00e9 JJ determined that the trial court judge erred for two reasons. First, documents and personnel of the World Bank benefit from immunity that cannot be waived in the case of documents, and must be expressly waived in the case of personnel. While the INT operates independently from the rest of the World Bank, the function it performs of ensuring that funds granted to projects are used for their intended purposes is part of the World Bank\u2019s proper functioning and is contemplated in the same agreements that set out the immunities that apply to World Bank documents and personnel. Second, in the narrow context of the proceeding to challenge a wiretap authorization, the documents that the accused persons were seeking were not relevant.<\/p>\n

In upholding the World Bank\u2019s immunities, the Court seemed particularly swayed by public policy considerations about the importance of the immunities applicable to international organizations\u2019 documents and personnel in the fight against corruption. It noted that these immunities are \u201cintegral to the independent functioning of international organizations\u201d and that international financial institutions such as the World Bank \u201care particularly well placed to investigate corruption and serve at the frontlines of international anti-corruption efforts\u201d The Court warned against interpreting the immunities of international organizations as capable of being waived through the action of sharing information with bodies such as the RCMP as such interpretations would potentially have \u201ca chilling effect on collaboration with domestic law enforcement. In the view of the Court, \u201cwhen international financial organizations, such as the appellant World Bank Group, share information gathered from informants across the world with the law enforcement agencies of member states, they help achieve what neither could do on their own\u201d [World Bank Group v. Wallace,<\/em>\u00a02016 SCC 15, decided on 29.04.2015]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Canada: While deciding a matter the Court has upheld the immunity status and independence of international organizations by rejecting <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":32072,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[5071],"class_list":["post-45861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-jurisdictional-immunity"],"yoast_head":"\nWorld Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Canada: While deciding a matter the Court has upheld the immunity status and independence of international organizations by rejecting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-05T09:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-27T12:22:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-05T09:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-27T12:22:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Canada SC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld","og_description":"Supreme Court of Canada: While deciding a matter the Court has upheld the immunity status and independence of international organizations by rejecting","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-05-05T09:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-27T12:22:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/","name":"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg","datePublished":"2016-05-05T09:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-27T12:22:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Canada SC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/world-bank-jurisdictional-immunity-relating-to-information-sharing-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"World Bank jurisdictional immunity relating to information sharing, upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_canada.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/05\/state-immunity-act-not-applicable-on-acts-of-torture-committed-by-a-foreign-state-outside-canada\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":0},"title":"State Immunity Act, not applicable on acts of torture committed by a foreign State outside Canada","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Canada: In a recent case relating to sovereign immunity where Civil proceedings were initiated against Iran, its head of State and two State officials in relation to the alleged torture and death of a Canadian citizen in Iran, a question arose whether they are entitled to immunity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Courts"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/foreigncourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/uk-hc-indias-claim-to-1-mn-pounds-held-by-pakistan-through-their-high-commissioner-in-uk-on-trust-for-nizam-vii-and-his-successors-in-title-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":1},"title":"UK HC | India\u2019s claim to 1 Mn Pounds held by Pakistan through their High Commissioner in UK on trust for Nizam VII and his successors in title, upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court of Justice: Marcus Smith J., dismissed Pakistan's claim over a sum of \u00a31,007,940 deposited in 1948 by the government of Hyderabad with the Pakistan High Commission in London. The Court ruled that \u201cNizam VII was beneficially entitled to the Fund and those claiming in right of Nizam\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/High-Court-UK.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/High-Court-UK.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/High-Court-UK.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/High-Court-UK.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/High-Court-UK.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":107641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/23\/uk-supreme-court-decides-against-government-and-its-officials-in-two-human-rights-cases-rules-they-must-face-the-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":2},"title":"UK Supreme Court decides against Government and its officials in two Human Rights cases, rules they must face the claims","author":"Saba","date":"February 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of United Kingdom:\u00a0Two human rights cases have been decided by the UK Supreme Court against UK officials. The respondents (Behlaj and Rahmatullah) sought a declaration of illegality and damages arising from what they contend was the participation of the UK officials in their unlawful abduction, kidnapping and removal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288648,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/06\/sealed-cover-public-interest-immunity-natural-justice-non-disclosure-of-material-fairer-alternative-open-justice-supreme-court-cji-chandrachud-hima-kohli-legal-updates-national-security-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Sealed Covers violate natural and open justice\u2019: The Why-What-How of \u2018Public Interest Immunity proceedings\u2019, the \u2018fairer\u2019 alternative suggested by Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Observing that the sealed cover procedure violates both principles of natural justice and open justice, the Supreme Court has held that the public interest immunity proceeding is a less restrictive means to deal with non-disclosure on the grounds of public interest and confidentiality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sealed Cover","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1019.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/06\/vice-president-does-not-enjoy-presidential-immunity-while-acting-in-the-capacity-of-president\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":4},"title":"Vice-President does not enjoy Presidential immunity while acting in the capacity of President","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 6, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitutional Court of Uganda: In the plea regarding dismissal of corruption charges against the Vice-President while acting in the capacity of the President , a five judge bench of the Ugandan Constitutional Court held that despite interpreting Article 137(1); of the Ugandan Constitution in its literal manner due to non-ambiguity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Courts"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/foreigncourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":45323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/29\/constitutionality-of-section-94a1-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":45861,"position":5},"title":"Constitutionality of Section 94A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, upheld","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In the present case where questions were raised on the constitutionality of Section 94A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the impugned provision contravenes Articles 14, 19, 51, 253 and 265 read with Entry 82 of List 1 of VII Schedule of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45861\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}