{"id":45621,"date":"2016-05-03T14:36:11","date_gmt":"2016-05-03T09:06:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=45621"},"modified":"2016-05-31T16:20:47","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T10:50:47","slug":"delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/","title":{"rendered":"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court:<\/strong> Deciding the question regarding the compliance of principles of natural justice in the context of inquiry conducted by the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) constituted under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 the Court held that when prejudicial statements are made, the same shall not be used against any person without giving him an opportunity to correct and contradict.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The issue involved a complaint against the appellant to ICC of Air India, Southern Region of misconduct based on sexual harassment by 17 women employees of Air India-SATS. Based on the complaint, the ICC conducted an enquiry and submitted its report. The appellant was aggrieved on the ground of non-compliance with the principles of natural justice as the inquiry concluded without giving him an opportunity to cross-examine the complainant and to controvert the factual finding in the inquiy report, hence vitiating the same. The stand of the Airport Authority was that the report was a priliminary report to find the apellant&#8217;s involvement and when a prima facie case was made out, further disciplinary proceedings would be initiated as per the rules and regulations of Air India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Setting aside the impugned report, the Bench of Muhamed Mustaque, J. held that every Internal Complaints Committee constituted under the Act necessarily has to follow the principles of natural justice in conducting their enquiry. The Rules framed under the Act also indicate that the Committee shall follow the principles of natural justice [See Rule 7(4)].\u00a0 The Court observed that the inquiry conducted by ICC as to the fact finding is final unless it is varied in appeal. It cannot be varied by the employer in a follow-up action to be taken in terms of Section 13.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that \u201c<em>The fundamental principles relating to the principles of natural justice is that when prejudicial statements are made, the same shall not be used against any person without giving him an opportunity to correct and contradict.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted that verbal cross-examination is not the sole criteria to controvert\/contradict any statement of the aggrieved before any authority. Primarily in a sexual harassment complaint, the Committee has to verify and analyse the capability of the aggrieved to depose before them fearlessly without any intimidation. Fair opportunity has to be understood in the context of an atmosphere of free expression of grievance. If the Committee is of the view that the witness or complainant can freely depose without any fear, certainly the delinquent can be permitted to have verbal cross-examination of such witnesses. In cases, where the Committee is of the view that the complainant is not in a position to express freely,\u00a0 it can adopt such other method permitting the delinquent to contradict and correct either by providing statement to the delinquent and soliciting his objections to such statement. The Court observed that a fair opportunity should be given to the delinquent in such manner as the committee thinks fit to consider. The ICC was directed to reconsider the matter after giving fullest opportunity to the petitioner. [<em>L.S. Sibu<\/em> v. <em>Air India Limited<\/em>, Writ Petition (C) No. 4001 of 2016 (A), decided on April 8, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: Deciding the question regarding the compliance of principles of natural justice in the context of inquiry conducted by the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[5011,2805,5001],"class_list":["post-45621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-air-india","tag-natural_justice","tag-sexual-harassment-at-workplace"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Deciding the question regarding the compliance of principles of natural justice in the context of inquiry conducted by the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-03T09:06:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-31T10:50:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/\",\"name\":\"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-03T09:06:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T10:50:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness","og_description":"Kerala High Court: Deciding the question regarding the compliance of principles of natural justice in the context of inquiry conducted by the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-05-03T09:06:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-31T10:50:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/","name":"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-05-03T09:06:11+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T10:50:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/delinquent-entitled-to-fair-opportunity-in-inquiry-proceedings-in-case-of-sexual-harassment-at-work-place-to-contradictcross-examine-complainant-and-witness\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Respondent entitled to fair opportunity in inquiry proceedings in case of sexual harassment at work place, to contradict\/cross-examine complainant and witness"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-court-directs-litigation-cost-to-standered-chartered-bank-for-non-compliance-posh-provisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":0},"title":"[POSH Act] Delhi Court directs costs of Rs 50,000 to Standard Chartered Bank for non-compliance of provisions by its Internal Complaints Committee","author":"Arunima","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi Court observed that it is crucial for Delhi Commission for Women to focus on substantive actions rather than superficial gestures just for the sake of publicity and bringing the name in newspaper or to find fault in the other institution when equal responsibility lies with them also.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rouse avenue court, delhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/21\/internal-complaints-settle-sexual-harassment-case-before-starting-inquiry-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":1},"title":"Internal Complaints Committee obligated to attempt Conciliation to settle sexual harassment case before starting inquiry: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"November 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe enquiry is nothing but an eye wash because the same was conducted without following any procedure which had to be mandatorily followed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/11\/aspiring-safer-workplaces-blindspot-in-the-sexual-harassment-law-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":2},"title":"Aspiring Safer Workplaces; Blindspot in the sexual harassment law in India\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Simran Jain\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/14\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace-sc-directions-to-implement-posh-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":3},"title":"Sexual Harassment at workplace: \u201cAssure women safe &#038; secure workplace or they will fear stepping out\u201d; SC issues directions for PoSH Act implementation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court attributed the reluctance on the part of victims of Sexual Harassment at workplace to report the misconduct to, (i) uncertainty about who to approach under the Act for redressal of their grievance; and (ii) lack of confidence in the process and its outcome.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sexual harassment of women at workplace","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/17\/sexual-harassment-at-workplace-madras-hc-partially-vitiates-inquiry-report-not-providing-accused-opportunity-cross-examine-witnesses\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":4},"title":"[Sexual Harassment at Workplace] Madras HC partially vitiates inquiry report for not providing accused an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSexual harassment causes considerable harm to women. Harassment undermines women's workplace authority, reduces them to sexual objects and reinforces sexual stereotypes and inappropriate gender behaviour. It can have deleterious consequences for the mental and physical health of women\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/08\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace\/","url_meta":{"origin":45621,"position":5},"title":"Sikk HC | Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace| Open for Executive Authority to decide the scope of the term &#8216;workplace&#8217;","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: The Division Bench of Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ. and Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., partly allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the Judgment dated 08-12-2020 passed in Silajit Guha vs. Sikkim University, WP(C) No.30 of 2019 by Single Bench, partly dismissing the petition deciding the issue of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}