{"id":44551,"date":"2016-04-21T15:34:24","date_gmt":"2016-04-21T10:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=44551"},"modified":"2016-05-11T17:44:37","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T12:14:37","slug":"all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/","title":{"rendered":"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court<\/strong>: The present Notice of Motion is the Defendant No. 1\u2019s Application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in which the prayer was made in order to refer to Arbitration for resolving all disputes between Plaintiff and Defendant in terms of the Arbitration Agreement contained in a Term Sheet dated June 13, 2012.\u00a0 The Suit itself was first mounted as a copyright action. The Plaintiff produces, distributes and exhibits feature films through various media and in various modes. It owns copyright in several feature films. In March 2012, Defendant No. 1 approached the Plaintiff saying that it had sufficient expertise in the business of content distribution to manufacturers of devices by which content could be \u2018pre-embeded\u2019 or \u2018pre-burned\u2019. A Term Sheet dated 13th June 2012 was executed between the parties. Preceding this Term Sheet there was some correspondence in which the Plaintiff alleged that there was copyright infringement by Defendant, but for the present purpose this matters little given the frame of the of the present Notice of Motion. Plaintiff\u2019s and the Defendants were represented by Senior Counsels V.R. Dhond and Dr. Veerendra Tulzapurkar respectively. Dr. Tulzapurkar submitted that there is no specific bar to the arbitration or the arbitrability of such disputes. Plaintiff\u2019s claim is under the Term Sheet. This is not a case where the allegation is that Defendant is guilty of copyright infringement simpliciter. There is very much a contract between the parties. Therefore, all civil disputes of the kind mentioned in the Term Sheet and in the Arbitration Agreement lend themselves to arbitration, and it is settled law that all civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded. The counsel for Plaintiff relied on Section 62 of the Copyright Act and argued that the remedies sought by the Plaintiff are in Rem and are thus inherently non-Arbitrable. Later, Defendant Nos. 2 to 8 filed Affidavits and stated that they are agreeable to Arbitration and further relied on the amended Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which now includes parties or persons claiming through or under a party to an Arbitration agreement. \u00a0Each of them have also said that they were all sub-licensees of Defendant No. 1. The Defendant No. 1 further contended that the remedies claimed by the Plaintiff are in Personam and thus can be referred to Arbitration. The Single Judge G.S. Patel J., while agreeing to the contentions raised by the Defendant disposed of the said Notice of Motion by referring all the disputes in the Suit to Arbitration. [Eros International Media <\/em>vs. Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd<\/em>,\u00a02016 SCC OnLine Bom 2179<\/a><\/b> decided on April 12, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: The present Notice of Motion is the Defendant No. 1\u2019s Application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1192,3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-alternate_dispute_resolution","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nAll civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: The present Notice of Motion is the Defendant No. 1\u2019s Application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-21T10:04:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T12:14:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/\",\"name\":\"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-21T10:04:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T12:14:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded","og_description":"Bombay High Court: The present Notice of Motion is the Defendant No. 1\u2019s Application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-21T10:04:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T12:14:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/","name":"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2016-04-21T10:04:24+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T12:14:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/21\/all-civil-disputes-are-by-definition-arbitrable-except-those-that-are-specifically-excluded\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All civil disputes are, by definition, arbitrable except those that are specifically excluded"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281569,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/13\/issued-summons-in-suit-and-notice-application-under-order-xxxix-rules-1-and-2-c-p-c-to-american-video-sharing-app-triller-in-copyright-infringement-case-filed-by-yash-raj-films-legal-news-legal-rease\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":0},"title":"[YashRaj Copyrights case] Delhi High Court issues summons and notice to the American video sharing application \u2018Triller’","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiff contended that the impugned platforms contained various features, such as the audio extraction feature, which are beyond the limited role of an intermediary specified under Section 79 (2)(a) of the IT Act, thereby disentitling the defendant from the 'safe-harbour' protection guaranteed to intermediaries under the IT Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294267,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/bombay-hc-refuses-interim-injunction-shemaroo-entertainment-copyright-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":1},"title":"[Copyright Infringement] Bombay High Court refuses to grant interim injunction to Shemaroo Entertainment","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court perused the assignment deed pertaining to the film \u2018Amba\u2019 and opined that \u2018the said work\u2019 indicates plaintiff's failure in making out a prima facie case of only audio rights being assigned to the defendant.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299016,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/delhi-hc-directs-goldmines-telefilms-to-not-upload-audio-visual-songs-from-14-movies-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":2},"title":"Delhi HC directs Goldmines Telefilms to not upload audio-visual songs from 14 movies in copyright infringement case by Super Cassettes Industries","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suit is filed in respect of exploitation of audio-visual songs from the movies, namely, Diljale; Main Aisa Hi Hoon; Vaastav; Bees Saal Baad; Ek Chaddar Maili Si; Guru; Hisaab Khoon Ka; Jungbaaz; Pati Patni Aur Tawaif; Pyaar Ka Mandir; Tahakla; Muddat; Indaniyat ke dushman; and Oonche Log.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/trademark-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Are trademark disputes arbitrable? Court interprets S. 8 of Arbitration Act; differentiates between rights emanating from Trademark Act and Trademark Agreement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jayant Nath, J., observed that the assignment of the trademark is by a contract and not by a statutory act. It does not involve any exercise of sovereign functions of the State. Defendant filed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Master\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Alternate Dispute Resolution"","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281254,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/delhi-high-court-holds-termination-agreement-contract-of-service-valid-guise-of-indringement-suit-bhojpuri-khesari-lal-yadav-youtube-specific-relief-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":4},"title":"An artist cannot be compelled to deal with another party against his own wish in perpetuity; Delhi High Court holds termination of agreement by Khesari Lal Yadav, valid","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Grant of injunction in favour of the plaintiff company would cause irreparable injury to the Artist which cannot be compensated in monetary terms as he would be forced to continue with the contract of personal service even though mutual trust has been lost between parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":273635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/dynamic-injunction-delhi-high-court-injuncts-rogue-websites-from-illegally-streaming-warner-bros-original-cinematographic-films\/","url_meta":{"origin":44551,"position":5},"title":"[Dynamic Injunction] Delhi High Court injuncts ‘rogue websites’ from illegally streaming Warner Bros. Original cinematographic films","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Warner Bros. Entertainment Limited (\u2018plaintiff') seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining www.uwatchfree.st (\u2018Defendant 1') and such other mirror\/redirect\/alphanumeric websites discovered to provide additional means of accessing the Defendant Website, Navin Chawla, J. granted permanent injunction against Defendant 1 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44551\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}