{"id":44241,"date":"2016-04-18T14:06:12","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T08:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=44241"},"modified":"2016-05-11T17:47:51","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T12:17:51","slug":"delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: Upholding the validity of Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 the Court held the said provision is a procedural safeguard in favor of an employee to ensure that an order of termination or dismissal is not passed without the prior approval of the Director of Education in order to avoid arbitrary or unreasonable termination orc dismissal of an employee of a recognized private school.<\/p>\n

The bench of V. Gopala Gowda and Amitava Roy, JJ held that the Delhi High Court\u2019 decision of striking down the said provision in Kathuria Public School v. Director of Education, 113(2004) DLT 703 (DB) is erroneous as wrong reliance was place on TMA PAI Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002)8 SCC 481, by the division bench as the subject matter in controversy therein was not the security of tenure of the employees of a school, rather, the question was the right of educational institutions to function unfettered. It was further said that while the functioning of both aided and unaided educational institutions must be free from unnecessary governmental interference, the same needs to be reconciled with the conditions of employment of the employees of these institutions and provision of adequate precautions to safeguard their interests. Section 8(2) of the DSE Act is one such precautionary safeguard which needs to be followed to ensure that employees of educational institutions do not suffer unfair treatment at the hands of the management.<\/p>\n

In the case where the matter related to retrenchment of a driver, the Court held that the respondent-Managing Committee in the instant case, did not obtain prior approval of the order of termination passed against the appellant from the Director of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi as required under Section 8(2) of the DSE Act hence, the termination order passed against the appellant is thus, bad in law. [Raj Kumar<\/em> v. Director of Education<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine SC 317<\/a>, decided on 12.04.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: Upholding the validity of Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 the Court held the said provision is <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Upholding the validity of Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 the Court held the said provision is\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-18T08:36:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T12:17:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-18T08:36:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T12:17:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law","og_description":"Supreme Court: Upholding the validity of Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 the Court held the said provision is","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-18T08:36:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T12:17:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/","name":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2016-04-18T08:36:12+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T12:17:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/delhi-high-courtss-order-striking-down-the-s-82-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973-held-bad-in-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Courts\u2019s order striking down the S. 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 held bad in law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/doe-prior-approval-mandatory-termination-order-s82-delhi-school-education-act-delhihc\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":0},"title":"Prior approval of Directorate of Education is mandatory for passing termination order under S.8(2) of Delhi School Education Act, 1973: Delhi High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDuring the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner had reached the age of superannuation. Therefore, the Court held that ends of justice would be met if petitioner was directed to be paid compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":57261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/19\/all-schools-in-delhi-irrespective-of-recognition-come-within-the-purview-of-the-delhi-school-education-act-1973\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":1},"title":"All schools in Delhi irrespective of recognition, come within the purview of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Deciding upon the issue as to whether the unrecognised schools in Delhi came under the purview of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, the Single Bench of Valmiki J.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Mehta, J. held that the provisions of the Act, including filing an appeal under Section 8(3), will apply\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/29\/cant-interpret-by-another-year-under-rule-105-of-delhi-school-education-rules-1973-as-by-one-year-at-a-time-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":2},"title":"Can\u2019t interpret \u201cby another year\u201d under Rule 105 of Delhi School Education Rules 1973 as \u201cby one year at a time\u201d: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dr DY Chandrachud and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that the words \u201cby another year\u201d in Rule 105(1) of Delhi School Education Rules 1973 stipulate that the maximum period of probation permissible is two years. Amending History of Rule 105 of the Delhi School Education\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/21\/supreme-court-after-holding-departmental-enquiry-prior-approval-of-director-of-education-must-be-obtained-for-terminating-employee-of-a-recognised-institution\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":3},"title":"Recognised institution’s employee can’t be terminated without prior approval of Director of Education; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that prior approval of the Director of Education is mandatory as per Section 18 of the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989, on termination after the disciplinary proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-162.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":323713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/delhi-hc-quashes-delhi-school-tribunal-order-for-illegal-termination-based-on-no-work-no-pay-principle-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":4},"title":"‘No Work No Pay’ Principle inapplicable in Illegal Termination case; Delhi High Court quashes Delhi School Tribunal order","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court reiterated that in cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is normal rule.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280834,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/02\/delhi-high-court-admission-ews-certificate-right-to-education-school-reservation-legal-research-update-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":44241,"position":5},"title":"Last date for admission in EWS category is 31st December of any given academic year; belated admission impermissible: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that belated admission in a particular academic year would be totally dehors the scheme of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973 and would be counterproductive to the very purpose of reserving seats for children belonging to the EWS category.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44241\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}