{"id":44181,"date":"2016-04-18T09:25:19","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T03:55:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=44181"},"modified":"2016-05-31T16:17:13","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T10:47:13","slug":"no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court: <\/strong>Taking suo motu cognizance of the disturbances created by the respondent by not allowing the Additional and District Sessions Judge, Unakoti and his aides to enter the District Court premises, the Division Bench of Deepak Gupta, C.J., and S. Talapatra, J., berated the respondent for holding the Court at ransom and reiterated the stance of the Supreme Court in Communist Party of India (M)<\/em> v. Bharat Kumar<\/em>, (1998) 1 SCC 201<\/a>, wherein it was held that the courts should not be subjected to strikes and boycotts. It was further observed that there can be no \u2018rule of law\u2019 if the Courts are prevented from functioning and are held at ransom. The Bench however deemed it fit to accept the apology rendered by the respondent for his actions stating that, the Courts should be magnanimous and lenient in dealing with contempt matters where the contemnor has accepted his mistake and apologized for it.<\/p>\n

In the present case the Court took cognizance of the action of the respondent on the basis of the report furnished by the Sessions Judge of Unakoti Dictrict Court wherein it was stated that how a mob led by the respondent prevented the Sessions Judge and the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) from entering the Court premises. As per the report, the respondent even indulged in violence. Arguing on behalf of the respondent Shankar Kumar Deb contended that, the respondent reacted in the spur of the moment and had no intention of disrupting the business of the District Court. The counsel further put forth before the Court that the respondent regrets his actions.<\/p>\n

Perusing the facts of the case and the apology rendered by the respondent, the Court stated that nobody has the right to prevent others from doing their work, especially when it comes to the courts. The Court further observed that the principle of \u2018rule of law\u2019 which is a \u2018golden thread\u2019 that runs through the Constitution, cannot be administered if the Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly. The Bench chose not to take any stringent action against the respondent as he had already rendered an apology and accepted his mistake. However the Court warned that if in future such incidents are repeated then the Court shall respond sternly. [Court on its Own Motion <\/em>v. Subrata Bhattacharjee, <\/em>2016 SCC OnLine Tri 262<\/a>, decided on 14.03.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court: Taking suo motu cognizance of the disturbances created by the respondent by not allowing the Additional and District Sessions <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\n'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court: Taking suo motu cognizance of the disturbances created by the respondent by not allowing the Additional and District Sessions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-18T03:55:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-31T10:47:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/\",\"name\":\"'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-18T03:55:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T10:47:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly","og_description":"Tripura High Court: Taking suo motu cognizance of the disturbances created by the respondent by not allowing the Additional and District Sessions","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-18T03:55:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-31T10:47:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/","name":"'Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-04-18T03:55:19+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T10:47:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/18\/no-rule-of-law-if-courts-are-boycotted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘Rule of law\u2019 cannot be administered if Courts are boycotted and prevented from functioning properly"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/whether-absence-of-rule-of-law-or-utter-disregard-for-the-same-propels-a-country-towards-inevitable-ruin-contempt-of-court-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":0},"title":"Whether absence of rule of law or utter disregard for the same propels a country towards inevitable ruin? Del HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that, attempts to circumvent or undermine judicial decisions need to be viewed seriously in order to ensure that the functioning of our country is unhindered, especially during turbulent times, Subramonium Prasad, J., held that, \u201cIt is only the rule of law which not only cements the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelRule-of-law.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelRule-of-law.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelRule-of-law.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelRule-of-law.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelRule-of-law.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/11\/determination-of-pension-to-be-governed-by-the-rule-as-it-existed-at-the-time-of-joining-or-the-rule-in-force-at-the-time-of-retirement-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":1},"title":"Determination of Pension to be governed by the rule as it existed at the time of joining or the rule in force at the time of retirement? SC answers\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDiscrimination, which is not based on any reasonable classification, is violative of all canons of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/18\/validity-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Can a daughter approach Family Court on behalf of her father to challenge validity of his marriage? OR only parties to marriage can challenge validity? Read in light of S. 7 of Family Courts Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of R.D Dhanuka and V.G. Bisht, JJ., addressed a concern wherein a daughter filed a petition seeking a declaration of her father\u2019s marriage to be null and void on knowing that the lady concealed the fact of her being married and not divorced from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/29\/husband-stubbornly-and-obstinately-refused-to-comply-with-the-orders-of-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":3},"title":"Contempt of Court | Husband stubbornly and obstinately refused to comply with the orders of the Court; No full disclosure of income: Read Del HC\u2019s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing an issue of non-compliance of Court\u2019s order with regard to paying maintenance to wife, Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., held that, The actions\/ omissions of the Respondent in choosing to show complete disregard to the orders of the Court cannot be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/madras-high-court-contempt-of-court-savukku-shankar-you-tube-suo-motu-judiciary-dishonest-and-corrupt-simple-imprisonment-red-aepixon-article-191a-constitution-article-192-rule-8\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court finds YouTuber Savukku guilty of criminal contempt; sentenced him to six months imprisonment for derogatory remarks on the higher Judiciary","author":"Editor","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a suo motu contempt petition against the YouTuber Savukku Shankar, the division bench of G.R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi, JJ. has held Savukku guilty for criminal contempt for proclaiming in the public domain that all Judges are corrupt and dishonest, as it was not a slip\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":36861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/24\/disparaging-remarks-and-gesticulations-towards-the-bench-bring-jail-term-for-advocate-khosla\/","url_meta":{"origin":44181,"position":5},"title":"Disparaging remarks and gesticulations towards the bench bring jail term for Advocate Khosla","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 24, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The spree of alleged contemptuous actions by Advocate Deepak Khosla and the incessant recusal of judges in hearing his matter were finally brought to rest by a Division bench of Najmi Waziri J. and Ashutosh Kumar JJ., which ruled for one month imprisonment term and a penalty\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}