{"id":43731,"date":"2016-04-15T10:46:06","date_gmt":"2016-04-15T05:16:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=43731"},"modified":"2016-05-31T16:17:18","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T10:47:18","slug":"allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/","title":{"rendered":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0<\/strong>While observing that an alleged anti-competitive conduct can be initiated by the Commission in terms of provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 only if the alleged anti-competitive conduct has already taken place, CCI rejected an information against National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL) pertaining to its proposal to operate as a registrar and share transfer agent. CCI rejected the allegations on the ground that entry of NSDL Database Management Ltd. (NDML), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSDL, in the participant market is a mere proposal. The order was passed while Commission was hearing an information filed by Registrars Association of India alleging that NSDL, through its wholly owned subsidiary NDML, is trying to enter into the participant market i.e. <\/em>RTI\/ STA market wherein it acts as a regulator. It was further alleged in the information that this act of NSDL would create business uncertainties for other players in the participant market and would lead to consolidation in the securities market where the two markets such as depository services market and participant market (as envisaged in the Depositories Act, 1996) would merge, thereby creating a monopoly situation in the market. After perusing the material on record and hearing both the parties, CCI noted, \u201cSince the opposite parties (NSDL and NDML) are not operating in the participant market as of now, the alleged anti-competitive conduct of opposite parties in that market cannot be examined in terms of the provisions of Sections 3 or 4 of the Act at this stage.\u201d It was further noted by the Commission that there is also nothing binding on NSDL to not engage in any activities relating to the participant market through its subsidiary \u201cNDML\u201d as according to SEBI there are no restrictions on the activities that can be carried out by a subsidiary of a depository. CCI also observed that Registrars Association of India has already raised the issue before SEBI, which is looking into the matter. While noting that the allegations leveled against NSDL do not raise any competition concern in the market at this stage, CCI closed the information. [Registrars Association of India<\/em> v. National Securities Depository Ltd.<\/em>,[2016] CCI 15<\/a>, \u00a0decided on March 29, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that an alleged anti-competitive conduct can be initiated by the Commission in terms of provisions of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"\nAllegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that an alleged anti-competitive conduct can be initiated by the Commission in terms of provisions of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T05:16:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-31T10:47:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/\",\"name\":\"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-15T05:16:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T10:47:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature","og_description":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that an alleged anti-competitive conduct can be initiated by the Commission in terms of provisions of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-15T05:16:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-31T10:47:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/","name":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2016-04-15T05:16:06+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T10:47:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/15\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-national-securities-depository-ltd-rejected-as-premature\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against National Securities Depository Ltd., rejected as premature"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6656,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/11\/allegations-of-unfair-business-practices-against-automobile-company-maruti-suzuki-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":0},"title":"Allegations of unfair trade practices against automobile company Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0CCI has rejected allegations of \u201cunfair trade practices\u201d against automobile company Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. on the ground that prima facie, no case of contravention of the provisions of either Section 3 or Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made out against the Company.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":59791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/04\/applications-challenging-probe-into-the-role-of-persons-in-charge-of-mahyco-monsanto-biotech-india-ltd-for-conduct-of-business-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":1},"title":"Applications challenging probe into the role of persons in-charge of Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Ltd. for conduct of business, rejected","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI):\u00a0While observing that it is permissible for the Commission to issue directions to the Director General to look into the role of the persons in-charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the companies, before returning the finding of contravention against the Companies as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":82011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/26\/allegations-of-anti-competitive-conduct-against-power-grid-corporation-of-india-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":2},"title":"Allegations of anti-competitive conduct against Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., dismissed","author":"Saba","date":"October 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India: While observing that every consumer\/procurer must have freedom to exercise their choice freely in the procurement of goods and services, CIC dismissed charges against Power Grid Corporation alleging that the Corporation abused its dominant position with the policy that materials used in construction of transmission lines\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/05\/securities-appellate-tribunal-directs-restitution-of-shares-pledged-in-favour-icici-hdfc-bajaj-finance-indusind-bank-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":3},"title":"Securities Appellate Tribunal directs restitution of shares pledged in favour of Axis Bank, ICICI Bank, Bajaj Finance, HDFC Bank and IndusInd Bank","author":"Arunima","date":"January 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The appropriate process was not done and like a highway robber NSDL through illegal directions from SEBI transferred the pledged shares which were fungible, to the clients of Karvy which action was without any authority of law.","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"securities appellate tribunal, mumbai","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/12\/shardul-amarchand-mangaldas-advises-usd-457-million-ipo-nsdl\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":4},"title":"Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advises the Book Running Lead Managers on USD 457 million IPO of National Securities Depository Limited","author":"Editor","date":"August 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Issuer is the largest depository in India and a prominent market infrastructure institution, registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Law Firms News"","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas IPO advisory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas-IPO-advisory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas-IPO-advisory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas-IPO-advisory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas-IPO-advisory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/cci-dismisses-the-allegation-of-anti-competitive-practice-against-timex-group\/","url_meta":{"origin":43731,"position":5},"title":"CCI dismisses the allegation of \u2018anti-competitive\u2019 practice against Timex Group","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital, Chairperson and Augustine Peter, U.C. Nahta and G.P. Mittal, Members, while addressing information being filed under Section 19(1)(a) for contravention of provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, found no prima facie case made out.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43731\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}