{"id":42231,"date":"2016-04-07T13:04:58","date_gmt":"2016-04-07T07:34:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=42231"},"modified":"2016-04-15T11:03:00","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T05:33:00","slug":"courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/","title":{"rendered":"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras<\/strong><strong> High Court: <\/strong>Dismissing and disapproving the order laid down by the Single Judge Bench in <em>Rasu<\/em> v. <em>The Superintendent of Police, <\/em><em>W.P (MD) No.20559 of 2015<\/em>, wherein it was directed that the devotees should follow a \u2018dress code\u2019 while visiting temples, the Division Bench of V. Ramasubramanian and K. Ravichandrabaabu, JJ., relying on the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in <em>Meerut Development Authority<\/em> v. <em>Association of Management Studies<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2009_6_SCC_171\">(2009) 6 SCC 171<\/a>, held that the decision of the Single Judge Bench prescribing a \u2018dress code\u2019 for temples was not an issue directly or indirectly involved in the petition, therefore the ventured into an \u2018unchartered field\u2019 which the Courts are expressly prohibited from doing. The Bench further observed that the Courts must refrain from creating controversies and adjudicating upon them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present petition comes in the wake of the aforementioned writ petition dated 26.11.2015, wherein Vaidyanathan, J. prescribed a suitable dress code for men and women visiting temples. According to the rationale of the learned judge, the prescription of the dress code was done in order to \u201cenhance the spiritual ambience of the devotees\u201d. The decision however gave rise to a debate regarding the validity of the issue. The decision of the Single Judge resulted in the issuance of a Circular by the Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments directing the Board of Trustees of the respective temples to take a decision on the issue, keeping in mind the customary practices prevailing in the temple.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perusing the facts of the case, the Division Bench observed that suggesting a dress code for the devotees was not even a subject matter of the petition. The Court cautioned that the judges should refrain from imposing their personal values on the society by way of their judgments. The Court observed that neither prescribing a dress code was an issue in the earlier case, nor the petitioner sought any relief from the Court regarding the same, therefore the direction of the Single Judge was beyond the scope of the <em>lis<\/em> that was before him. The Court also expressed its reluctance to venture into the issue unless there is a \u2018real\u2019 litigation challenging the propriety, legality and desirability of the same, which can happen if only the temples choose to impose a dress code on the devotees. [<em>State<\/em> v. <em>Rasu, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Mad_1807\">2016 SCC OnLine Mad 1807,<\/a> decided on 04.04.2016]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To read the Judgment, click <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Mad_1807\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: Dismissing and disapproving the order laid down by the Single Judge Bench in Rasu v. The Superintendent of Police, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court: Dismissing and disapproving the order laid down by the Single Judge Bench in Rasu v. The Superintendent of Police,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-07T07:34:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T05:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-07T07:34:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T05:33:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible","og_description":"Madras High Court: Dismissing and disapproving the order laid down by the Single Judge Bench in Rasu v. The Superintendent of Police,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-07T07:34:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T05:33:00+00:00","author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/","name":"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-04-07T07:34:58+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T05:33:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/07\/courts-must-refrain-creating-controversies-by-way-of-imposing-their-personal-values-over-the-society-through-their-judgments\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prescribing dress code for devotees is akin to imposition of personal values over the society by way of judgments, therefore impermissible"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/06\/madras-high-court-imposes-restrictions-on-the-usage-of-cell-phones-by-the-priest-devotees-and-public-inside-arulmigu-subramaniya-swamy-temple-tiruchendur\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":0},"title":"Madras High Court imposes restrictions on the usage of cell phones by the priest, devotees, and public inside Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy Temple, Tiruchendur","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In a petition filed under Article 226 praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take effective measures to prohibit the possession and usage of Android Cell Phones inside the Sri Subramania Swamy Temple, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District, a Division Bench of R.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":247241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/17\/jain-trusts\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | \u2018Ayambil food\u2019 permitted to be distributed to Jain devotees by the Jain trusts during their 9 days of fasting commencing on 19th April, 2021; Devotees not allowed to enter temple premises","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.C. Gupte and Abhay Ahuja, JJ., permitted the distribution of Ayambil food to be served to the Jain devotees during their 9 days of fasting. Petition sought a mandamus requiring Respondent-State and local authority to allow petitioners and other 58 Jain Trusts to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/21\/covid-19-sc-allows-3-jain-temples-to-open-in-mumbai-for-paryushan-says-the-order-cannot-be-used-as-a-precedent\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":2},"title":"COVID-19| SC allows 3 Jain temples to open in Mumbai for &#8216;Paryushan&#8217;; says the order cannot be used as a precedent","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has allowed the opening of three temples, i.e. one each in Byculla, Dadar (W) and Chembur in Mumbai on 22.08.2020 and 23.08.2020 for devotees to perform the rituals connected with \u2018Paryushan\u2019. The Court, however\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/to-wear-or-not-to-wear-precedents-on-dilemma-of-wearing-headscarf-from-the-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":3},"title":"To Wear or Not to Wear? Precedents on dilemma of wearing \u2018Headscarf\u2019 from the Kerala High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In Nadha Raheem v. C.B.S.E,\u00a0 2015 SCC OnLine Ker 21660, Kerala High Court\u2019s Single Judge Bench in the year 2015 dealt with petitions by two female students belonging to the Muslim community contending that the dress code prescribed by the Central Board of Secondary Education (C.B.S.E) of wearing half sleeve\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-142-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-142-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-142-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-142-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-142-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-holds-dress-code-restricting-hijab-niqab-non-violative-of-fundamental-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":4},"title":"Dress code prescribed by Chembur Trombay Education Society restricting wearing of hijab, does not violate Fundamental Rights: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court referred to Fathima Thasneem v. State of Kerala, 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 5267, wherein it was held that there may be a fundamental right for a student to choose a dress but there is also a fundamental right of establishing, managing and administering an educational institution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231143,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/19\/covid-19-scs-march-23-order-on-extension-of-limitation-not-applicable-to-the-period-of-filing-charge-sheet-under-section-1672-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":42231,"position":5},"title":"COVID-19| SC&#8217;s March 23 order on extension of limitation not applicable to the period of filing charge sheet under Section 167(2) CrPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, SK Kaul and MR Shah, JJ has held that it\u2019s order dated 23.03.2020, wherein the Court had extended limitation period of appeals from high courts or tribunals on account of COVID-19 pandemic, cannot be read to mean that it ever intended to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}