{"id":42022,"date":"2016-04-05T11:03:25","date_gmt":"2016-04-05T05:33:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=42022"},"modified":"2016-05-11T17:58:27","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T12:28:27","slug":"retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: While ruling through its power under Sec. 482 CrPC, the Court has held that, the Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007 is retrospective in its operation.\u00a0 It was further held that retrospective operation of the Amendment Act will not affect the cases wherein the trial before the Magistrate has reached an advanced stage. The trial of a case may be said to have reached an advanced stage where any material witness\/witnesses have been examined by the prosecution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Amendment Act came into force with effect from 22nd February 2008. The amendment sought to change the forum for the trial of offences punishable under Sections 317, 318, 326, 363, 363-A, 365, 377, 392, .393, 394, 409, 435, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 477 and 477A, from that of a Court of Magistrate of First Class to that of a Court of Sessions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The single judge bench comprising of C.V. Sirpurkar, J. further observed that, \u201ca witness is material who is essential to the unfolding of the narrative on which the prosecution is based or who deposes to any part of the prosecution case but is not a formal witness.\u201d The bench also made an observation that, \u201cin a case in which only charge is framed but no witness has been examined or only formal witnesses have been examined would not come under the category of a case which has reached an advanced stage.\u201d The court finally concluded by applying retrospective operation to the Amendment Act\u00a0 and also held further to clarify that, \u201cwhere the Magistrate being of the opinion that the case is not at the advanced stage of trial, commits it to the Court of Session but the Sessions Court differs and is of the opinion that the trial in the case is already in advanced stage, it has option either to try the case itself or remit it back to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of First Class but Session Court has to exercise this jurisdiction in such a way that the purpose of saving is not frustrated and no prejudice is caused to either party.\u201d[<em>Dwarka Prasad v. State of M.P.<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_MP_671\">2016 SCC OnLine MP 671<\/a>, Decided on 30.03.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: While ruling through its power under Sec. 482 CrPC, the Court has held that, the Criminal Procedure Code <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":42031,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: While ruling through its power under Sec. 482 CrPC, the Court has held that, the Criminal Procedure Code\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-05T05:33:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T12:28:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-05T05:33:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T12:28:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: While ruling through its power under Sec. 482 CrPC, the Court has held that, the Criminal Procedure Code","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-05T05:33:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T12:28:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/","name":"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg","datePublished":"2016-04-05T05:33:25+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T12:28:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/retrospective-operation-of-criminal-procedure-code-madhya-pradesh-amendment-act-2007-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Retrospective Operation of Criminal Procedure Code (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":150774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/21\/2002-amendment-to-section-26-of-sebi-act-is-retrospective-in-nature-all-offences-committed-before-29-10-2002-will-stand-vested-in-the-new-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":0},"title":"2002 Amendment to Section 26 of SEBI Act is retrospective in nature; All offences committed before 29.10.2002 will stand vested in the new forum","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where it was argued that for offences allegedly committed under Section 26(2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 before 29.10.2002 (whether or not, taken up for trial before 29.10.2002) the trial was to be conducted by the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate (or,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":148351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/08\/financial-burden-is-not-a-reason-sufficient-to-invalidate-the-retrospective-operation-of-payment-of-gratuity-amendment-act-2009\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":1},"title":"Financial burden is not a reason sufficient to invalidate the retrospective operation of Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009","author":"Saba","date":"August 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the retrospective operation of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashok B. Hinchigeri, J. held that the newly substituted Section \u00a02(e) and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":330560,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":2},"title":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court criticised the state of uncertainty among various officers due to inconsistent application of the Ordinance and suggested that the State Government should have provided clarity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":36281,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/19\/notice-issued-to-the-attorney-general-for-india-with-regard-retrospective-operation-of-payment-of-bonus-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":3},"title":"Notice issued to the Attorney General for India with regard retrospective operation of Payment of Bonus Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While dealing with question relating to the retrospective applicability of Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015, the Court issued notice to the Attorney General for India. In the present case, the attention of the Court has been drawn to the fact that a learned Single Judge of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/07\/amendment-of-section-142-of-n-i-act-is-in-realm-of-procedural-law-therefore-has-a-retrospective-effect\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":4},"title":"Amendment of Section 142 of N.I. Act is in realm of procedural law therefore has a retrospective effect","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court- While deciding on a question whether the amendment carried out in Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on 15.06.2015 would have a retrospective operation or would be prospective in nature and if such amendment has a retrospective effect whether the complaint filed by the petitioner could have been saved,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/security-investment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/security-investment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/security-investment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/security-investment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/security-investment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":34321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/01\/retrospective-applicability-of-payment-of-bonus-amendment-act-2015-stayed\/","url_meta":{"origin":42022,"position":5},"title":"Retrospective Applicability of Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015, stayed","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: While dealing with question relating to the retrospective applicability of Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015, the Court stayed the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act by way of an interim order.\u00a0 The Amendment Act, 2015 was introduced on 1st \u00a0January, 2016 and was made retrospectively applicable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42022\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}