{"id":41211,"date":"2016-04-02T12:52:58","date_gmt":"2016-04-02T07:22:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=41211"},"modified":"2016-04-15T16:42:32","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T11:12:32","slug":"high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","title":{"rendered":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while disposing an appeal filed under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, is maintainable, especially when Section 18 of the 2002 Act offers the alternative remedy, a three judge Bench comprising of S.A. Nazeer, A.B. Hinchigeri and A.N. Venugopala Gowda, JJ., held that unless the Court is convinced that a case falls under exceptional circumstances, any writ petition challenging the order passed by the DRT while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 17, cannot be entertained by the High Courts in the light of the mandate of Article 141 of the Constitution. The Court further declared Hotel Vandana Palace <\/em>v. The Authorised Officer, <\/em>2011 SCC OnLine Kar 3928<\/a>, with regard to the maintainability of a writ petition without exhausting the remedy as provided by Section 18 of the 2002 Act, to be per incuriam<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The petitioners filed an appeal to the High Court against the order of the DRT without resorting to the remedy provided under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act, as it required \u2018deposit of huge court fee, which is neither efficacious nor feasible\u2019. The Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court eventually had to constitute the present Bench to decide the issue as there existed two conflicting opinions on the point.<\/p>\n

The Bench took into consideration two conflicting views of this Court on this point in Hotel Vandana Palace<\/em> case and Lily Joseph<\/em> v. The Authorised Officer<\/em>, 2013 SCC OnLine Kar 1450<\/a> \u00a0where the writ petition challenging the order of DRT was declined in view of the existence of an alternative remedy under Section 18. The Court observed that the Lily Joseph<\/em> case was correctly decided in the light of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev<\/em>\u00a0v.\u00a0State of Maharashtra<\/em>\u00a0(2011) 2 SCC 782<\/a>. In view of the constitutional mandate under Article 141 which states that the law declared by the Supreme Court is to be binding on all courts, the Bench observed that Vanadana<\/em> Palace<\/em> case had been wrongly decided. It was further held that the legislative intent of the SARFAESI Act and the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 does not allow the Court to entertain any writ petition challenging a DRT order unless any exceptional circumstances like- statutory body not acting in accordance with the provisions of the Act in question; defiance of principles of judicial procedure etc. arise. [M\/s. Deepak Apparels Pvt. Ltd<\/em>. v. City Union Bank Ltd.,<\/em> 2016 SCC OnLine Kar 686<\/a>, decided on 22.03.2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nHigh Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-02T07:22:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T11:12:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/\",\"name\":\"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-02T07:22:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T11:12:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-02T07:22:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T11:12:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","name":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-04-02T07:22:58+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T11:12:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/27\/section-17-of-sarfaesi-act-provides-remedy-before-drt-against-the-order-of-district-magistrate\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":0},"title":"Section 17 of SARFAESI Act provides remedy before DRT against the order of District Magistrate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, a Division Bench comprising of Hemant Gupta, CJ and Atul Sreedharan, J. allowed a writ appeal and set aside the Orders of the learned Single Judge as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":1},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal. Petitioner had\u00a0 filed Writ Petition challenging impugned order which was an interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/27\/security-deposit-in-lease-agreement-not-debt-under-rddbfi-act-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":2},"title":"Security deposit in lease agreement not \u201cdebt\u201d under RDDBFI Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce security deposit does not fall within the purview of Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts due to the Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993 defining \u201cdebt\u201d, the Tribunal would have no jurisdiction, as per Section 17 of the same Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Security deposit in lease agreement not debt RDDBFI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Security-deposit-in-lease-agreement-not-debt-RDDBFI.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Security-deposit-in-lease-agreement-not-debt-RDDBFI.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Security-deposit-in-lease-agreement-not-debt-RDDBFI.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Security-deposit-in-lease-agreement-not-debt-RDDBFI.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/ker-hc-can-demand-notices-issued-under-s-132-of-sarfaesi-act-be-challenged-invoking-writ-jurisdiction-of-high-courts-court-considers\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Can demand notices issued under S. 13(2) of SARFAESI Act be challenged invoking writ jurisdiction of High Courts? Court considers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court:\u00a0A.M. Badar, J., while addressing the instant matter held that, demand notices under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act can be challenged before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). The instant petition was filed by four Cashew Processing Units. Petitioners were impugning demand notices issued under Section 13(2) of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/drt-application-section-17-sarfaesi-act-rejected-madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":4},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DRT to register case against Tata Motors Finance Ltd.","author":"Ritu","date":"March 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that no document needs to be provided for registering an application under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act, when the same is not a condition precedent required under the said Section.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/26\/application-s-171-sarfaesi-act-maintainable-actual-possession-taken-secured-creditor\/","url_meta":{"origin":41211,"position":5},"title":"Application under S. 17(1) SARFAESI Act is maintainable only after actual possession is taken by secured creditor","author":"Saba","date":"February 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Full Bench comprising of Dilip B. Bhosale, CJ, and Devendra Kumar Arora and Vivek Chaudhary, JJ., sat to decide a reference by the learned Single Judge, wherein it was inter alia held that the remedy of an application under Section 17(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41211\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}