{"id":41071,"date":"2016-04-01T16:47:19","date_gmt":"2016-04-01T11:17:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=41071"},"modified":"2016-04-15T16:42:54","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T11:12:54","slug":"cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> While upholding the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance of Patent Rights, the Court dismissed a challenge by Ericsson to two orders passed by CCI to look into allegations of abuse of market dominance. In order to confirm regularity in communication networks across various countries, patented technology is adopted as a standard essential patent (SEP) and use of such technology would require a license from the patentee holding the SEP, in this case Ericsson. These have to be licensed on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. Ericsson had challenged two orders passed by the CCI whereby it was prima facie held that the Swedish firm was abusing its dominant position for use of its SEPs relating to technology used in mobile handsets by Micromax Informatics Ltd and Intex Technologies (India) Ltd.<\/p>\n

In its complaint before CCI, Micromax and Intex alleged that Ericsson, which has a large portfolio of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) in respect of technologies that are used in mobile handsets and network stations, had abused its position of dominance as it was demanding excessive royalties on mobile phones. It was, however, asserted by Ericsson that the SEPs had been granted on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and that it had not abused its dominant position.<\/p>\n

The CCI had directed investigation into the allegations, prompting Ericsson to approach the Court. The firm had claimed that the CCI did not have the jurisdiction to issue such orders as the dispute in the case was on issues of grant of patent licenses, which would come under the jurisdiction of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks or a Civil Court. The single bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakhru J., held that there was \u201cno irreconcilable repugnancy or conflict between the Competition Act and the Patents Act. And, in absence of any irreconcilable conflict between the two legislations, the jurisdiction of CCI to entertain complaints for abuse of dominance in respect of Patent rights cannot be ousted.\u201d The bench also noted that while the dispute under the Patent Act would be specific to the parties involved, the \u201cthe orders passed by CCI are in rem.\u201d The Court also held that the purpose and objective of both the Competition Act, 2002, and the Patents Act, 1960, were different and that they do not overlap. Effectively, CCI would be at liberty to continue its investigation into anti-competitive practises by Ericsson regarding use of its Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) by other companies such as Micromax and Intex. The Court further observed that “It is also necessary to clarify that nothing stated herein should be construed as an expression of opinion – prima facie or otherwise – on the merits of the allegations made by Micromax and Intex; all observations made or views expressed herein are in the context of the jurisdiction of CCI to pass the impugned orders.” \u00a0[Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. CCI<\/em>, W.P.(C) 1006\/2014 & CM Nos.2037\/2014 & 2040\/2014, Decided on 30-03-2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: While upholding the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance of Patent <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nCCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While upholding the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance of Patent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-01T11:17:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T11:12:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/\",\"name\":\"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-01T11:17:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T11:12:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While upholding the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) to entertain complaints regarding abuse of dominance of Patent","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-04-01T11:17:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T11:12:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/","name":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-04-01T11:17:19+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T11:12:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/01\/cci-free-to-continue-its-enquiry-in-cases-relating-to-abuse-of-dominance-of-patent-rights\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CCI free to continue its enquiry in cases relating to abuse of dominance of Patent Rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":331232,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/competition-commission-of-india-jurisdiction-across-all-sectoral-boundaries\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":0},"title":"Competition Commission of India\u2019s Jurisdiction Across All Sectoral Boundaries","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Danish Khan* and Aakrit Aditya Sharma**","rel":"","context":"In "DSK Legal"","block_context":{"text":"DSK Legal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/dsk-legal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Competition Commission of India Jurisdiction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Competition-Commission-of-India-Jurisdiction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/delhi-high-court-patent-act-prevail-competition-act-legal-updates-patent-act-special-statute\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":1},"title":"Can CCI under Competition Act inquire into the actions of patentee who asserts his rights after patent being issued in India? Delhi High Court clarifies","author":"Arunima","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that when assessed, by the maxim generalia specialibus non derogant or by the maxim lex posterior derogat priori, the Patents Act must prevail over the Competition Act on the issue of exercise of rights by a patentee under the Patents Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/21\/more-power-to-cci-the-delhi-hc-upholds-the-ccis-jurisdiction-to-probe-against-monsantos-abusive-practices\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":2},"title":"More Power to CCI \u2014 The Delhi HC upholds the CCIs Jurisdiction to probe against Monsanto\u2019s abusive practices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Anshuman Sakle, Partner, Ruchi Verma, Associate and Nandini Pahari,Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) July 61","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/19\/bombay-hc-on-abuse-of-dominance-by-asian-paints\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court dismisses plea against CCI\u2019s order for probe against Asian Paints over abuse of dominance in decorative paints market","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The allegations made against Asian Paints were for offering arbitrary discounts and incentives to dealers in exchange of exclusivity by threatening the dealers against stocking the products manufactured Birla Paints and for coercing transport agents to avoid dealing in their products.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abuse of dominance by Asian Paints","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance-by-Asian-Paints.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance-by-Asian-Paints.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance-by-Asian-Paints.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance-by-Asian-Paints.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/06\/nclat-on-ccis-power-to-examine-patented-products-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":4},"title":"CCI lacks power to examine dispute over patented products: NCLAT dismisses appeal against Vifor International","author":"Shikha","date":"November 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, the issue was whether CCI has power to examine the case, where the subject matter was protected by the Patent Act. The Tribunal observed that Section 3(5) of the Competition Act, 2002 states that the Competition Act will not restrict the right of any person in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CCI\u2019s power to examine patented products dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CCIs-power-to-examine-patented-products-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CCIs-power-to-examine-patented-products-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CCIs-power-to-examine-patented-products-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CCIs-power-to-examine-patented-products-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/07\/predatory-pricing-not-only-abuse-but-also-proof-of-dominance\/","url_meta":{"origin":41071,"position":5},"title":"Predatory Pricing — Not only abuse but also proof of dominance\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Dhruv Rajain, Principal Associate, Shubhankar Jain, Associate and Aakriti Thakur, Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas\u00a0 Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) February 79","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41071\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}