{"id":40841,"date":"2016-03-30T11:22:58","date_gmt":"2016-03-30T05:52:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=40841"},"modified":"2016-04-15T16:44:45","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T11:14:45","slug":"tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","title":{"rendered":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held that, the tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband would definitely come within the category of shared household but as long as the tenancy survives. The case involved a matrimonial dispute between the tenant and his wife, which led to filing of a complaint under Domestic Violence Act. The landlord had entered a tenancy agreement with the tenant (the husband) which ended in February 2015, but on completion of the agreement the suit property was not vacated, due to which the landlord files a suit for eviction. On the basis of the pleadings, the Trial Court vide judgment dated 30.09.2015, decreed the suit under Order 12 Rule 6 of the CPC holding that the tenant (husband)who was the main contestant, admitted the existence of landlord-tenant relationship as also of the expiration\/termination of the tenancy. The appellant (wife) challenged the aforesaid judgment and decree of the Trial Court on the ground that the suit of eviction and possession was misused, solely for the purposes of ousting the appellant from the suit property which was the matrimonial home\/shared household and thus she was divested of her Constitutional as well as statutory right of residence and shelter. The stand of the appellant before the Trial Court was that she was entitled to any one of the reliefs under Sections 19 to 21 of the Domestic Violence Act and such relief could be sought by her before any court as per Section 26(1) of the Domestic Violence Act. The appellant raised the issue that under Section 26(2) of the Domestic Violence Act, the relief sought by her to continue in the tenanted household ought to have been granted in addition to or along with any other relief.<\/p>\n

The single judge bench comprising of Ashutosh Kumar, J. observed that the right of the appellant, under Section 17 of the Act would not be enforced against the landlord, who cannot be called a respondent in the first instance, a respondent in a domestic relationship; in the second instance; his premises which were let out for a specified period to the appellant along with her husband in a shared household after the expiry of the lease agreement and proposed eviction is only in accordance with the procedure established by law i.e by filing a suit for eviction before the competent Court. Similarly, the residence orders which could be obtained by an aggrieved wife under Section 19 of the Act also would not include a landlord in whose premises the couple resided under a lease agreement, the period of which has expired. No doubt, right of residence is a part of the right of maintenance to a wife. Had the appellant taken the plea that she would continue to pay the monthly rental, the situation would have been different. However, this is also debatable in as much as no person could be forced to enter into a contract with another without his consent or choice. Thus it would have depended upon the desire and willingness of the landlord to continue with the tenancy when the tenancy has expired.<\/p>\n

The Court while rejecting the claim of the appellant held that it would not be lawful, in the opinion of this Court, to force an outsider who is not privy to any dispute between the warring couple or has any truck or alliance with them to extend tenancy in their\/in wife’s favour without his choice or willingness despite the beneficent provisions of the Domestic Violence Act when the term of lease has expired and the tenancy also stands terminated. The rights of a person are no less valuable than the right of the appellant, here in this case to have a place of residence and protection. [Anukriti Dubey v. Partha Kansabanik<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 1930<\/a><\/b>, Decided on 23-03-2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nTenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-30T05:52:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T11:14:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/\",\"name\":\"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-30T05:52:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T11:14:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-03-30T05:52:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T11:14:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","name":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-30T05:52:58+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T11:14:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":376642,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/24\/bom-hc-demolition-doesnt-eclipse-landlords-requirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":0},"title":"Tenancy continues despite demolition, but eviction justified on landlord’s bona fide requirement & tenant’s prolonged non-user: Bombay HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that the landlord has established the requirement as pleaded and subsequent developments are not such as to completely eclipse or extinguish the bona fide requirement.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"effect of building demolition on Tenancy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/effect-of-building-demolition-on-Tenancy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":153354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/30\/landlord-does-not-have-to-affirmatively-prove-the-payment-of-rent-in-case-sub-letting\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":1},"title":"Landlord does not have to affirmatively prove the payment of rent in case of sub-letting by tenant","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the rule of inference in matters relating to sub-tenancy or sub-letting, the bench RK Agrawal and Ashok Bhushan, JJ held that considering the fact that the process of sub-letting, the landlord is kept out of the scene and that the payment of rent or monetary consideration may\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/delhi-hc-decrees-eviction-based-on-admissions\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Admissions can be inferred from vague\/evasive denials\u2019; Delhi HC decrees eviction based on admissions despite denial of landlord-tenant relationship","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The issues that have been set up in defence by the respondent are such that it will not be possible for him to succeed even if these are entertained, so far as concerns the recovery of possession of the subject premises. No useful purpose will thus be served if the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"eviction based on admissions","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/eviction-based-on-admissions.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/mesne-profits-payable-continuation-possession-tenant-after-expiry-determination-forfeiture-termination-lease\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":3},"title":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession payable only after \u2018expiry of lease\u2019 or even after \u2018determination, forfeiture or termination\u2019? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the matter at hand, the Court directed the tenant to deposit Rs.5,15,05,512\/-, considering the location of the demised premises in the heart of Kolkata, the rent, the alleged non-payment of rent, the default in payment of interest, as alleged.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/08\/married-female-tenants-sibling-is-neither-an-heir-nor-a-family-under-the-u-p-urban-buildings-regulation-of-letting-rent-and-eviction-act-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":4},"title":"Married female tenant’s sibling is neither an \u201cheir\u201d nor a \u201cfamily\u201d under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the brother of a married female tenant is neither a \u2018heir\u2019 as visualized under Section 3(a) nor \u2018family\u2019 within the meaning of Section 3(g) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296630,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/sc-limitation-section-143-rajasthan-premises-rent-control-eviction-act-1950-tenants-landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":40841,"position":5},"title":"Does Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 completely bar institution of suit within 5 years? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court held that not putting a quietus to the prolonged dispute at hand, spanning 38 years, on something as simple as tenancy issue, would be a travesty of justice.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"limitation under section 14(3) of rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/limitation-under-section-143-of-rajasthan-premises-control-of-rent-and-eviction-act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}