{"id":40653,"date":"2016-03-28T12:19:11","date_gmt":"2016-03-28T06:49:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=40653"},"modified":"2016-04-15T16:46:20","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T11:16:20","slug":"no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/","title":{"rendered":"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court<\/strong>: In a case relating to trademark passing-off between two media companies involved in the business of running online radio stations, a Division Bench comprising Gupta J. and Nandrajog J. dismissed the appeal, ruling that to interfere against an order declining to grant protem ad-interim injunction, perversity has to be demonstrated in the finding of the Single Bench.<\/p>\n

The Appellant company prayed before the Court for granting a declaration that the trademark \u201cPEHLA NASHA\u201d was a well known mark used by them and by using the trademark \u201cNASHA FM\u201d, \u201cRADIO NASHA\u201d, \u201cNASHA 91.9 FM\u201d and \u201cNASHA 107.02\u201d, the respondent was guilty of passing off and therefore should be restrained by issuing a permanent injunction. The Appellant had claimed that it was operating Online Internet Radio Station using the mark \u201cPEHLA NASHA\u201d since the year 2014 and it had gained immense popularity. By launching \u201cRADIO NASHA\u201d, HT Media was infringing its right in the trademark \u201cNASHA\u201d for which its application for registration was pending before the Registrar of Trademarks. Hence, the Appellant had filed an application for an ad-interim injunction against HT media from using the word\/trademark \u201cRADIO NASHA\u201d or any other trademark\/trade name which was deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s mark \u201cPEHLA NASHA\u201d. To the contrary, the respondent company represented by A.M. Singhvi rebutted saying that the test to be applied in the present case was whether there were users of the trademark \u201cNASHA\u201d even prior to the plaintiff’s user and the respondent had successfully demonstrated the prior users of this mark. He further claimed that HT Media was also a prior user of the mark \u201cNASHA\u201d to a certain extent given that it applied for registration of domain names www.nasha.fm.in<\/a> and www.radionasha.com<\/a> prior to Entertainment Network.<\/p>\n

Refusing to look into the merits of the case, without letting the respondents have an opportunity to file their pleadings, the Court declined to grant an injunction citing the lack of a strong prima-facie case as advanced by the appellants. The Court also noted the judgment of the Supreme Court in Wander Ltd. v. Antox India (P) Ltd. <\/em>1990 (Supp) SCC 727<\/a>, where it had cautioned the Division Bench noting that the Appellate Court will not interfere with the exercise of discretion of the Court of first instance and substitute its own discretion except where the discretion has been shown to have been exercised arbitrarily or capriciously or perversely. [Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. HT Media Ltd <\/em>2016 SCC OnLine Del 1915<\/a><\/b>\u00a0decided on 21\/03\/2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: In a case relating to trademark passing-off between two media companies involved in the business of running online radio <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nNo interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: In a case relating to trademark passing-off between two media companies involved in the business of running online radio\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-28T06:49:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T11:16:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/\",\"name\":\"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-28T06:49:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T11:16:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found","og_description":"Delhi High Court: In a case relating to trademark passing-off between two media companies involved in the business of running online radio","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-03-28T06:49:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T11:16:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/","name":"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-28T06:49:11+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T11:16:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/28\/no-interference-with-the-discretion-of-the-court-of-first-instance-unless-arbitrary-action-found\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No interference with the discretion of the Court of first instance unless arbitrary action found"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":226491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/04\/in-rajya-sabha-re-introduction-of-cotpa-bill\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":0},"title":"In Rajya Sabha | Re-Introduction of COTPA Bill","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The target envisaged in National Health Policy, 2017 for a relative reduction in prevalence of current tobacco use is 30% by 2025. The National Health Policy 2017 of the Government of India identifies coordinated action on \u2018Addressing tobacco, alcohol and substance abuse\u2019 as one of the seven priority areas as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/bombay-hc-upholds-rejection-of-interim-injunction-in-mahalaxmi-trademark-dispute-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC upholds rejection of interim injunction in ‘Mahalaxmi’ trademark dispute case; imposes \u20b910,000\/- cost","author":"Ritu","date":"December 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that a party seeking interim injunction in a passing-off action must produce concrete evidence of use, goodwill, and business turnover.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"'Mahalaxmi' trademark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mahalaxmi-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mahalaxmi-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mahalaxmi-trademark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Mahalaxmi-trademark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/15\/injunction-against-the-use-of-trademark-vacated-in-light-of-bona-fide-use-of-surname\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":2},"title":"Injunction against the use of trademark vacated in light of bona fide use of surname","author":"Saba","date":"May 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of L. Narayana Swamy, J. dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal while vacating the injunction passed against the respondent prohibiting him from using the trademark \u2018PATIL FRAGRANCES\u2019. The appellant filed a suit against the respondent for infringement and passing off its trademark and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/21\/covishield\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | “Serum Institute coined the term ‘Covishield’, took substantial steps towards development and manufacture”: Court finds no merit in Cutis Biotech’s passing off action","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Nitin Jamdar and C.V Bhadang, JJ., upheld the order of the District Court refusing to pass injunction against the use of the name \"Covishield\" by Serum Institute of India for its COVID-19 vaccine. What is the subject matter of the instant appeal? Instant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/20\/trademark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":4},"title":"[Trademark Dispute] Kar HC | A case of deceptively similar trademarks; Quintessential \u2018Common man\u2019 is neither blessed with the wisdom of Solomon nor the trained eyes of Sherlock Holmes","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P. Krishna Bhat J., set aside the impugned order with a direction to the Court to hear and dispose of the applications afresh by giving an opportunity to both sides and in accordance with the law. The facts of the case are such that the respondent\/plaintiff in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/karnataka-high-court-blinkit-vs-blinkhit-trademark-dispute-rules-in-favour-set-aside-injunction-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":40653,"position":5},"title":"[Blinkit v. Blinkhit Trademark Infringement] | Karnataka HC sets aside temporary restraining injunction against Blinkit","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the Trial Court made an error in allowing Blinkhit's application for temporary injunction, without properly appreciating the available materials on record vis-\u00e0-vis the trademark's usage and nature of the business carried out by the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}