{"id":397661,"date":"2026-10-01T13:00:01","date_gmt":"2026-10-01T07:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=397661"},"modified":"2026-10-01T13:15:20","modified_gmt":"2026-10-01T07:45:20","slug":"ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court:<\/span> While considering a civil revision challenging dismissal of an application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\">7 Rule 11<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), a Single Judge Bench of Lapita Banerji, J., held that the reliefs sought in the civil suit extended beyond the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement, and that the arbitrator would not be able to consider the interests of other parties entitled in equity and law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court upheld the impugned order and dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">Also read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/16\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-rejection-of-plaint-meaningful-reading-benami-bar\/\" target=\"_blank\">Clever Drafting Cannot Save a Benami Claim: Supreme Court on Meaningful Reading of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the petitioner and his 2 brothers had entered into an arbitration agreement dated 5 July 1999 concerning division of the assets and properties of their father. The parties were initially referred to arbitration, but the proceedings could not be concluded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544910\" target=\"_blank\">11<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> was thereafter filed before the High Court, and a sole arbitrator was appointed in 2017. However, the arbitral proceedings were terminated on 6 January 2018 as the arbitrator&#8217;s fees had not been paid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After termination of the arbitral proceedings, the respondents instituted a civil suit in 2018 seeking, inter alia, partition and separate possession of properties and rendition of accounts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner subsequently approached the High Court for appointment of a sole arbitrator. By order dated 27 April 2023, the coordinate Bench granted liberty to the parties to avail themselves of remedies in accordance with law. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the previously appointed arbitrator, who recalled the order terminating the proceedings and continued with the arbitration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, the petitioner had filed an application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523624\" target=\"_blank\">7 Rule 11<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>, contending that the civil suit was liable to be rejected because the disputes were subject to arbitration. The said application was dismissed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), aggrieved by which the petitioner approached the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined the reliefs claimed in both the arbitration proceedings and the civil suit and opined that not only division of assets was prayed for but also a preliminary decree for possession by way of partition was sought.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in passing a preliminary decree, it would not only look into the interests of the parties to the arbitration agreement but also the interests of other parties entitled in equity and law, which the learned arbitrator would not be able to do.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that rendition of accounts of M\/s T.G. Aggarwal &amp; Co. had also been prayed for in the civil suit, as it was alleged that the petitioner was managing the affairs of the firm and was in joint possession of the firm but was not accounting for the profits. The Court observed that the said claim was not the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also considered the reasoning in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jayesh H. Pandya<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/JqjGQHXN\" target=\"_blank\">(2003) 5 SCC 531<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Booz Allen &amp; Hamilton Inc.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SBI Home Finance Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/90F38h43\" target=\"_blank\">(2011) 5 SCC 532<\/a> and further found no impropriety or mala fides in the conduct of the respondents in pursuing the civil suit, as the civil suit had been filed in 2018 immediately after the learned arbitrator terminated the arbitral proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also noted that the arbitral proceedings were subsequently revived in 2023 but were still pending despite the expiry of the mandate stipulated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544931\" target=\"_blank\">29-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>, which had neither been extended by consent of the parties nor by orders of a competent court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court found no perversity in the impugned order, thus, dismissed the civil revision at hand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court clarified that the petitioner would not be precluded from raising all the issues in his defence before the learned trial court in his written statement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vijay Kumar Aggarwal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shubham Aggarwal<\/span>, CR No. 4293 of 2025 (O&amp;M), decided on 14-9-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Naveen Kumar and Ashima Mor, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Gurpreet Singh, Sr. Advocate, Karanvir Kathuria, Gunjan Nahata, and M.S. Kohli, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court examined whether a civil suit seeking partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts could proceed where an arbitration agreement covered division of the family properties.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":397671,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10111,40741,116087,54311,72922,48002,31554,60371,5622,2551,22424,52146,116088,60840],"class_list":["post-397661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration-agreement","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-bifurcation-of-suit","tag-civil-revision","tag-justice-lapita-banerji","tag-multiplicity-of-proceedings","tag-order-7-rule-11-cpc","tag-partition-of-property","tag-partition-suit","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-rejection-of-plaint","tag-rendition-of-accounts","tag-section-29-a-arbitration-act","tag-separate-possession"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC on Partition Suit and Arbitration Agreement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"headline\":\"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":723,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"arbitration agreement\",\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996\",\"bifurcation of suit\",\"Civil revision\",\"Justice Lapita Banerji\",\"Multiplicity of proceedings\",\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC\",\"Partition of Property\",\"partition suit\",\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\",\"Rejection of plaint\",\"rendition of accounts\",\"Section 29-A Arbitration Act\",\"separate possession\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC on Partition Suit and Arbitration Agreement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"Punjab & Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"partition suit arbitration agreement\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/01\\\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/shriyasingh\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC on Partition Suit and Arbitration Agreement | SCC Times","description":"Punjab & Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&H HC answers","og_description":"Punjab & Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/"},"author":{"name":"Shriya Singh","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"headline":"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers","datePublished":"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/"},"wordCount":723,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp","keywords":["arbitration agreement","Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996","bifurcation of suit","Civil revision","Justice Lapita Banerji","Multiplicity of proceedings","Order 7 Rule 11 CPC","Partition of Property","partition suit","Punjab and Haryana High Court","Rejection of plaint","rendition of accounts","Section 29-A Arbitration Act","separate possession"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/","name":"P&H HC on Partition Suit and Arbitration Agreement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-01T07:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-01T07:45:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"Punjab & Haryana High Court examines whether a partition suit seeking separate possession and rendition of accounts can proceed when property division is covered by an arbitration agreement","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"partition suit arbitration agreement"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/10\/01\/ph-hc-partition-suit-arbitration-agreement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can a civil suit for partition, separate possession and rendition of accounts continue when division of property is covered by an arbitration agreement? P&amp;H HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/partition-suit-arbitration-agreement.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397661"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397661\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":397663,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397661\/revisions\/397663"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/397671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}