{"id":395538,"date":"2026-09-07T16:00:28","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T10:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=395538"},"modified":"2026-09-09T15:58:25","modified_gmt":"2026-09-09T10:28:25","slug":"article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a case concerning the maintainability of a writ appeal against an order passed in proceedings under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> challenging orders of Revenue Courts, a Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva, JJ.<\/span>, held that a writ petition filed under Article 226 could not be treated as one under Article 227 merely to deny the aggrieved party an appellate remedy. The Court reiterated that the extraordinary jurisdiction and powers of the High Courts under Article 226 cannot be scuttled or whittled down by legislation and that Revenue Courts exercising statutory quasi-judicial powers cannot be equated with judicial courts. Holding that the validity of orders passed by such Revenue Courts could be tested in exercise of the High Court&#8217;s writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 20 July 2023 and restored Writ Appeal No. 576 of 2023 to the file of the Madhya Pradesh High Court for consideration afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant, challenged the order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur, whereby he was non-suited in his writ appeal on the ground that although the respondents had filed the writ petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>, it ought to be treated as one under Article 227 and, consequently, no appeal would lie against such an order. The respondents relied upon the earlier Division Bench judgment in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dangalia<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deshraj<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000928547\" target=\"_blank\">1973 SCC OnLine MP 42<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. (1977) MP series 739\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> support the said view.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dangalia<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deshraj<\/span>, the Division Bench had specifically observed that reversal of orders passed by the Revenue Courts could as well be sought in writ proceedings under Article 226, apart from Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court reiterated that the extraordinary jurisdiction and powers of the High Courts under Article 226 cannot be scuttled or whittled down by any legislation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It further held that Revenue Courts exercising statutory quasi-judicial powers cannot be equated with or treated on par with judicial courts, and the validity of orders passed by such Revenue Courts can be tested before the High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Therefore, the understanding that a petition filed under Article 226 could be treated as one under Article 227 so as to deny the appellant an appellate remedy could not be sustained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court set aside the impugned order dated 20 July 2023 and restored Writ Appeal No. 576 of 2023 to the file of the High Court for consideration afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law. All issues were left open. The appeal was accordingly allowed and pending application(s), if any, were disposed of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #ee0000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span><\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/07\/supervisory-jurisdiction-of-the-high-court-of-delhi-over-the-national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supervisory Jurisdiction of the High Court of Delhi Over the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission | SCC Times<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vrindavan Chaturvedi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pushpa Devi Khemka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uHN7BZkO\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 1787<\/a>, decided on 2-9-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Parminder Singh Bhullar, AOR, Uday Gupta, Sr. Adv., Shivani Lal, Madan Singh Thakur, Sourabh Singh Thakur, Hiren Dasan, Ajay Sharma, Unmukt Gera, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Deepanshu Rana, Priyaranjan Singh, Aaryan Bansal, Abhi Garg, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Siddharth R. Gupta, Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR, Mehul Agarwal, Shantanu Sharma, Uddaish Palya, Vishala Dwivedi, Yerradoddi Charvi Reddy, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> (1977) MP series 739<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy. Revenue Court orders can be challenged under Article 226.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67541,"featured_media":395541,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[107029,12141,14471,57697,70629,57950,5363,43374],"class_list":["post-395538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-appellate-remedy","tag-article-226","tag-article-227","tag-justice-sanjay-kumar","tag-justice-sanjeev-sachdeva","tag-revenue-court","tag-supreme-court","tag-writ-appeal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court on Article 226 vs Article 227 distinction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Malika Bhola\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":552,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"appellate remedy\",\"Article 226\",\"Article 227\",\"Justice Sanjay Kumar\",\"Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva\",\"Revenue Court\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Writ Appeal\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court on Article 226 vs Article 227 distinction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\"},\"description\":\"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Article 226 vs Article 227 Supreme Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/07\\\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\",\"name\":\"Malika Bhola\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Malika Bhola\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/malika-bhola\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court on Article 226 vs Article 227 distinction | SCC Times","description":"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal","og_description":"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Malika Bhola","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Malika Bhola","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/"},"author":{"name":"Malika Bhola","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1"},"headline":"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal","datePublished":"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/"},"wordCount":552,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp","keywords":["appellate remedy","Article 226","Article 227","Justice Sanjay Kumar","Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva","Revenue Court","Supreme Court","Writ Appeal"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/","name":"Supreme Court on Article 226 vs Article 227 distinction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-07T10:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-09T10:28:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1"},"description":"Article 226 vs Article 227: Supreme Court holds that a writ petition under Article 226 cannot be treated as one under Article 227 to deny an appellate remedy.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Article 226 vs Article 227 Supreme Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/09\/07\/article-226-vs-article-227-supreme-court-writ-appeal-revenue-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court: Article 226 Writ Petition cannot be treated as Article 227 to deny right of appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1","name":"Malika Bhola","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Malika Bhola"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/malika-bhola\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Article-226-vs-Article-227-Supreme-Court.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67541"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=395538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395538\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/395541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=395538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=395538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=395538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}