{"id":39441,"date":"2016-03-16T12:36:41","date_gmt":"2016-03-16T07:06:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=39441"},"modified":"2016-05-11T18:03:21","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T12:33:21","slug":"lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Lok Aayog&#8217;s role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0 <\/strong>The Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has categorically held that the role of the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog under the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog Adhiniyam, 2002 is only advisory and recommendatory in character and concededly not an authority empowered to issue and enforce any order by itself except submitting a report to the competent authority for appropriate action. The Lok Aayog being a recommendatory body is not an authority empowered to pass an order and recommendation must be seen in contradistinction to direction or mandate as held by the Supreme Court in <em>Manohar <\/em>v. <em>State of Maharashtra<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2012_13_SCC_14\">(2012) 13 SCC 14<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that as per Section 11(1) of the Adhiniyam, 2002, upon receipt of a complaint and after enquiry, if the Lok Aayog is of the opinion that the complainant has been able to establish the complaint, the Lok Aayog by a report in writing, has to communicate its findings and recommendations along with relevant documents and evidence to the competent authority as defined in Section 2(b). It is appropriate to notice that what is required to be reported by the Lok Aayog is its finding and recommendation. The Explanation to Section 11(1) states that \u201c<em>Opinion of Lok Aayog<\/em> in relation to any complaint, including a decision, report, finding or conclusion thereon, means the opinion of the majority of its members.\u201d Thus clearly the Lok Aayog has to communicate its opinion to the competent authority over the conduct of the delinquent public servant after its investigation and in no case it can be the mandate or order of the Lok Aayog to the competent authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that in the instant case, the Lok Aayog had failed to communicate its recommendation in the shape of report to the competent authority, rather it had communicated its order in the shape of mandate and thereby transgressed the advisory jurisdiction envisaged under Section 11(1) of the Adhiniyam, 2002 to report its recommendation which is ex facie without jurisdiction and without authority of law. The duty and function of the Lok Aayog after enquiry of any action in respect of the complaint received and investigated by him is recommendatory, precatory, advisory or directory in nature as it has to advise, counsel or suggest with certain course to be pursued or deposition made.\u00a0[<em>S.P.R. Sharma<\/em> v. <em>State of Chhattisgarh<\/em>, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Chh_466\">2016 SCC OnLine Chh 466<\/a><\/b>, decided on February 26, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0 The Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has categorically held that the role of the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Lok Aayog&#039;s role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lok Aayog&#039;s role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0 The Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has categorically held that the role of the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-16T07:06:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T12:33:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/\",\"name\":\"Lok Aayog's role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-16T07:06:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T12:33:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lok Aayog&#8217;s role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lok Aayog's role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lok Aayog's role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0 The Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has categorically held that the role of the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-03-16T07:06:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T12:33:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/","name":"Lok Aayog's role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-16T07:06:41+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T12:33:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/16\/lok-aayogs-role-held-to-be-purely-advisoryrecommendatory-not-empowered-to-issueenforce-any-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lok Aayog&#8217;s role held to be purely advisory\/recommendatory, not empowered to issue\/enforce any order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/13\/nature-of-niti-aayogs-directions-scope-of-engagement-of-civil-society-organizations-in-times-of-crisis-patna-hc-discusses\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":0},"title":"Nature of NITI Aayog&#8217;s directions &#038; Scope of engagement of Civil Society Organizations in times of crisis: Patna HC discusses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court:\u00a0A Division bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and S. Kumar, J., addressed two crucial issues revolving around the COVID-19 Pandemic. Issues raised for consideration: Whether guidelines of the NITI Aayog to the Chief Secretaries of the State governments are in nature of advisory communication or did it make\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/11\/litigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Litigation in the Court is not a \u201cgame of chess\u201d; Court dismisses appeal stating serious suppression of facts","author":"Editor","date":"March 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Shailendra Shukla, JJ., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging the order passed by the specified authority under M.P. Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam, 1974. The petitioners categorically averred that said Adhiniyam was not applicable to the agricultural land of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/20\/1st-mnlua-national-youth-parliament-2023\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":2},"title":"1st MNLUA National Youth Parliament, 2023","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"MNLUA is organizing its \u201c1st National Youth Parliament, 2023\u201d on the\u00a08th and 9th of April, 2023 comprising of three major committees \u2014NITI Aayog, Lok Sabha and National Security Council. Details of Maharashtra National Law University, Aurangabad The State of Maharashtra realising the importance of quality legal education and the need\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law School News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-805.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-805.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-805.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-805.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/04\/human-rights-commission\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":3},"title":"Chh HC | Can Human Rights Commission pass an order directing payment of compensation? HC answers in light of instant facts","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal, J., dismissed the petition and sets aside the impugned order. The petitioner in the instant petition challenges the legality and validity of the order dated 26.10.2009 passed by respondent 3 who have directed the petitioner to make a payment of Rs. 10,000\/on account of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sc-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam-1990-doesnt-prohibit-adm-from-passing-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":4},"title":"SC| Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 doesn\u2019t prohibit ADM from passing orders","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where it was being contended that the Additional District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to pass order under the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, the bench of Ashok Bhushan and KM Joseph, JJ held that in the Statutory Scheme of the Adhiniyam, 1990, there is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6264,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/09\/15\/permanent-lok-adalats-can-adjudicate-disputes-in-case-of-no-settlement-is-reached-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":39441,"position":5},"title":"Permanent Lok Adalats can adjudicate disputes in case no settlement is reached between the parties","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 15, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding an issue related to the validity of the award and jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat, the Court observed that the working of the Permanent Lok Adalats differ from the Lok Adalats constituted by the State\/ District Legal Services Authority as the Permanent Lok\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}