{"id":393719,"date":"2026-08-19T16:00:25","date_gmt":"2026-08-19T10:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=393719"},"modified":"2026-08-21T17:07:11","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T11:37:11","slug":"jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court:<\/span> In a petition seeking quashment of an FIR, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.A. Chowdhary<\/span>, J., considered whether a Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic that two positive cases had been detected in a locality could attract criminal liability under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC). The Court observed that the allegations did not disclose the essential ingredients of the offence, as there was no allegation or material showing any intent or likelihood to create enmity, hatred or ill-will between different groups, and consequently quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/08\/ph-hc-quashes-fir-bank-manager-dog-dressed-lord-krishna\/\" target=\"_blank\">P&amp;H HC quashes FIR against bank manager for dressing her dog as Lord Krishna<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804270\" target=\"_blank\">528<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNSS), seeking quashment of an FIR registered for the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The allegation in the FIR was that on 28 March 2020, the petitioner circulated a message in a WhatsApp group stating that two positive cases of Covid-19 had been found in the locality thereby creating panic in society.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the allegations did not disclose the commission of any offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. It was argued that neither the FIR nor the investigation suggested that the message had been circulated with the intent or likelihood contemplated under the provision. It was further submitted that the alleged rumour had not even been demonstrated to be false and that no evidence had been collected to establish the existence of the ingredients of the offence. On the other hand, the respondents submitted that the power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804270\" target=\"_blank\">528<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a> [corresponding to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC)] can be resorted to if the same is justified by the tests laid down in the section itself, however, the instant case is not covered under the sweep of the said section.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/09\/s-482-crpc-4step-process-to-check-veracity-of-quashment-prayer-by-accused-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">S. 482 CrPC: SC&#8217;s 4 step process to check veracity of quashment prayer by accused<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that, despite the passage of several years from registration of the FIR, the investigation had not culminated in filing of a final report and even the latest status report merely stated that the investigation was almost complete and that the challan would be presented shortly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and observed that the provision is attracted only where a person makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report with intent to create, or which is likely to create or promote, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different groups on grounds such as religion, race, caste, community, language or other similar grounds.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that a plain reading of the FIR did not disclose any of those essential ingredients. The allegation was limited to circulation of information regarding detection of Covid-19 cases in a locality. There was no assertion that the message was intended to create, or was likely to create, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between any groups on the grounds contemplated by Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court highlighted that creation of panic or fear by itself does not satisfy the requirements of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that even after investigation spanning almost 5 years, no material had been placed on record demonstrating the requisite intention on the part of the petitioner or indicating that the message was likely to promote hatred or enmity between different groups. The Court observed that the status report did not disclose collection of any evidence establishing the foundational ingredients of the offence. It was also not shown that the information allegedly circulated by the petitioner was false or fabricated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated the settled position that where the allegations contained in an FIR, even if accepted in their entirety, do not constitute the offence alleged, continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of the process of law and justify exercise of the Court&#8217;s inherent jurisdiction to secure the ends of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also considered the issue of limitation and noted that the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is punishable with imprisonment extending up to three years and that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519775\" target=\"_blank\">468<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> prescribes a limitation period of 3 years for taking cognizance of such an offence. The Court observed that no final report had been filed even after more than 5 years and the respondents had failed to furnish any satisfactory explanation for such extraordinary delay. The Court emphasised that permitting the investigation to continue indefinitely despite absence of material disclosing commission of the alleged offence would itself amount to abuse of the process of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/\" target=\"_blank\">Quashment of POCSO FIR amid compromise and pregnancy: Allahabad HC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, while allowing the petition, held that the allegations contained in the FIR did not disclose commission of an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\">505(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and that continuation of criminal proceedings beyond the statutory period of 3 years would serve no useful purpose and would result in miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, the Court quashed the FIR along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sandeep Kumar Bhat<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (UT of J&amp;K)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gFY8E8cV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine J&#038;K 611<\/a>, decided on 7-8-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner:<\/span> Ayushman Kotwal, Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> Shazia Asaf, Advocate vice P.D. Singh, Deputy AG.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">J&amp;K and Ladakh High Court held that fear or panic alone does not satisfy the provision unless the statement is intended, or likely, to promote enmity, hatred or ill-will between different groups.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":393722,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[112632,55664,73637,112633,21114,34037,112631,77387,41333],"class_list":["post-393719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-covid-19-rumour","tag-jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court","tag-justice-m-a-chowdhary","tag-panic-in-society","tag-quashing-of-fir","tag-section-468-crpc","tag-section-5052-ipc","tag-section-528-bnss","tag-whatsapp-message"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour isn&#039;t S. 505(2) IPC Offence: J&amp;K HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn&#039;t an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"J&amp;K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn&#039;t an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"headline\":\"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":885,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Covid-19 rumour\",\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court\",\"Justice M.A. Chowdhary\",\"panic in society\",\"quashing of FIR\",\"Section 468 CrPC\",\"Section 505(2) IPC\",\"Section 528 BNSS\",\"Whatsapp Message\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour isn't S. 505(2) IPC Offence: J&K HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn't an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/19\\\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sunaina\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour isn't S. 505(2) IPC Offence: J&K HC | SCC Times","description":"J&K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn't an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&K and Ladakh HC","og_description":"J&K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn't an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/"},"author":{"name":"Sunaina","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"headline":"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","datePublished":"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/"},"wordCount":885,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp","keywords":["Covid-19 rumour","Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","Justice M.A. Chowdhary","panic in society","quashing of FIR","Section 468 CrPC","Section 505(2) IPC","Section 528 BNSS","Whatsapp Message"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/","name":"Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour isn't S. 505(2) IPC Offence: J&K HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-19T10:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-21T11:37:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"J&K and Ladakh HC quashes FIR, holding a Covid WhatsApp message creating panic isn't an offence under S. 505(2) IPC absent intent to promote enmity.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/19\/jk-hc-covid-whatsapp-rumour-creating-panic-not-offence-section-505-2-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere Covid-19 WhatsApp rumour creating panic does not constitute offence under S. 505(2) IPC: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Covid-19-WhatsApp-rumour-creating-panic.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/393719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=393719"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/393719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":393947,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/393719\/revisions\/393947"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/393722"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=393719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=393719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=393719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}