{"id":392731,"date":"2026-08-07T16:30:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T11:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=392731"},"modified":"2026-08-07T15:50:36","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T10:20:36","slug":"quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/","title":{"rendered":"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803752\" target=\"_blank\">64(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803777\" target=\"_blank\">87<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803475\" target=\"_blank\">137(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNS) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550527\" target=\"_blank\">5(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">j<\/span>)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ii<\/span>)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO), the Division Bench of Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, JJ., allowed the petition, holding that the peculiar facts of the case, including the prosecutrix carrying the petitioner&#8217;s child, the compromise between the parties, the complainant&#8217;s unwillingness to pursue the prosecution, and the parties living together with the intention to solemnise their marriage upon the prosecutrix attaining majority, warranted quashment of the FIR to secure the ends of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/bhc-denies-to-interfere-with-sentence-of-man-convicted-for-impregnating-minor-daughter-on-basis-of-dna-evidence-in-pocso-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO | Betrayed Her Trust, Destroyed Her Life, Degraded Her Very Soul: Bombay HC Upholds Life Sentence of Man Convicted of Impregnating 12-Year-Old daughter<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner and the prosecutrix were in a consensual relationship, during which the prosecutrix, who was a minor at the relevant time, became pregnant and was carrying a five-month pregnancy. The complainant, being the prosecutrix&#8217;s mother, accepted the relationship, expressed her unwillingness to pursue the criminal proceedings, and agreed to solemnise the marriage of the prosecutrix with the petitioner after she attained majority. A compromise was also executed between the parties. The State, based on the ultrasound report, verified the prosecutrix&#8217;s pregnancy. In these circumstances, the petitioner approached the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/04\/ker-hc-chest-breast-distinction-pocso-sexual-assault\/\" target=\"_blank\">Grabbing Child&#8217;s Chest with Sexual Intent Amounts to Sexual Assault Under POCSO: Kerala HC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, taking note of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harmeet Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of NGCT Delhi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KrDlCoPb\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC Online Del 1707<\/a>, observed that although the relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix was consensual, the prosecutrix was a minor when physical relations were established. The Court further noted that the prosecutrix was carrying a five-month pregnancy, the parties had entered into a compromise, the complainant and prosecutrix had agreed not to pursue the FIR, the petitioner had undertaken to solemnise the marriage with the prosecutrix upon her attaining majority, and the parties were presently living together as husband and wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harmeet Singh<\/span>, the Delhi High Court had laid down a structured framework requiring courts to satisfy themselves, before quashing a POCSO case on the basis of a victim&#8217;s consent to closure, that the victim is acting on her own genuine free will and has not been misled or pressured; that she has consistently sought closure since the inception of proceedings; that the arrangement underlying the settlement is not a ruse to evade conviction; whether the parties have lived together as a family and whether children have been born of the relationship; whether the accused has been violent or coercive towards the victim; and the respective ages of the parties and the implications of any age gap. The Court also held that these considerations require it to personally interact with the parties before reaching a decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that quashing the FIR would serve the ends of justice and that no fruitful purpose would be served by permitting the charge-sheet to proceed or consequential orders to be passed by the trial court. Accordingly, the Court directed the supervisory authority not to proceed further with the charge-sheet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Allowing the writ petition, the Court quashed the impugned FIR registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803752\" target=\"_blank\">64(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803777\" target=\"_blank\">87<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803475\" target=\"_blank\">137(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">BNS<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550527\" target=\"_blank\">5(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">j<\/span>)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ii<\/span>)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO<\/a>. The Court further directed the supervisory authority not to proceed with the charge-sheet and clarified that, even if the charge-sheet had already been forwarded to the trial court, no cognizance should be taken, and no further proceedings should be conducted. The Court also directed the petitioner to properly look after the prosecutrix and provide her with all necessary care and comfort during her pregnancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pritesh Khare<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, CRLP No. 5888 of 2026, decided on 6-7-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Aviral Raj Singh, Aditya Vikram Singh, Mohd. Yasir, Mohd.Altaf Mansoor<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> G.A.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Allahabad High Court quashed FIR under the POCSO Act, holding that continuation of the criminal proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose in the peculiar facts of the case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":392732,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2510,70594,70389,21754,2711,42026,9091,62250,32255,58562,111782,111781,23524,2644,13981,21114,111783],"class_list":["post-392731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023","tag-bns","tag-charge-sheet","tag-compromise","tag-consensual-relationship","tag-criminal-proceedings","tag-criminal-writ-petition","tag-ends-of-justice","tag-fir-quashed","tag-harmeet-singh-v-state-nct-of-delhi","tag-minor-prosecutrix","tag-pocso-act","tag-pregnancy","tag-protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act","tag-quashing-of-fir","tag-social-marriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Quashment of POCSO FIR amid compromise and pregnancy: Allahabad HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":705,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023\",\"BNS\",\"charge-sheet\",\"compromise\",\"Consensual Relationship\",\"criminal proceedings\",\"criminal writ petition\",\"Ends of Justice\",\"FIR quashed\",\"Harmeet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)\",\"minor prosecutrix\",\"POCSO Act\",\"pregnancy\",\"Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act\",\"quashing of FIR\",\"Social marriage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/\",\"name\":\"Quashment of POCSO FIR amid compromise and pregnancy: Allahabad HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"POCSO FIR quashed after compromise\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/07\\\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quashment of POCSO FIR amid compromise and pregnancy: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR","og_description":"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR","datePublished":"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/"},"wordCount":705,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp","keywords":["Allahabad High Court","Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023","BNS","charge-sheet","compromise","Consensual Relationship","criminal proceedings","criminal writ petition","Ends of Justice","FIR quashed","Harmeet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)","minor prosecutrix","POCSO Act","pregnancy","Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act","quashing of FIR","Social marriage"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/","name":"Quashment of POCSO FIR amid compromise and pregnancy: Allahabad HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-07T11:00:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad HC quashes POCSO FIR involving a pregnant minor prosecutrix, observing that continuation of proceedings would not serve the ends of justice.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"POCSO FIR quashed after compromise"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/08\/07\/quashment-of-pocso-fir-amid-compromise-and-pregnancy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When Justice Demands Closure, Criminal Proceedings Need Not Continue; Allahabad HC Quashes POCSO FIR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/POCSO-FIR-quashed-after-compromise.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=392731"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":392735,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392731\/revisions\/392735"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/392732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=392731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=392731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=392731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}