{"id":390980,"date":"2026-07-21T15:00:38","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T09:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=390980"},"modified":"2026-07-21T15:03:36","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T09:33:36","slug":"know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/","title":{"rendered":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The breakdown of social norms contributes to a deviant behaviour, especially when individuals lack clear moral guidance from their communities. Since law keeps changing from time to time, what is legal, may not necessarily be moral. Rapid social change, orchestrated by law, often creates conducive conditions for criminal behaviour&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; text-align: right;\">:Justice M.M. Sundresh<a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Shubha v. State of Karnataka, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1426\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Born on 21 July 1962, in the picturesque city of Erode, Justice M.M. Sundresh&#8217;s remarkable legal career, led to his appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 26 August 2021. His journey from a small town to the highest echelons of the Indian judiciary serves as an inspiration to many aspiring legal minds.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #c00000; color: #c00000;\">Early life and Education<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Sundresh was born in Erode to Mr. V. K. Muthusamy, who was a Senior Advocate at the High Court of Judicature at Madras.<a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Hon'ble Thiru. Justice M. M. Sundresh, Madras High Court.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a> His early life revolved around Erode, where he completed his school and pre-university education. Later, he pursued his higher studies at Loyola College in Chennai, where he completed his B.A. degree. His thirst for legal knowledge led him to Madras Law College, where he successfully acquired his LL. B degree.<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh, Supreme Court of India.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #c00000; color: #c00000;\">Career as an Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 1985, Justice Sundresh was enrolled as an Advocate in the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, marking the commencement of his legal practice.<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. Supra.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> Throughout his legal career, Justice Sundresh practiced in the High Court of Judicature at Madras, one of the most prestigious and influential high courts in India. He honed his skills in the chambers of eminent advocates such as S. Sivasubramaniam and his father, V. K. Muthusamy, a Senior Advocate, further enriching his legal acumen. His experience and proficiency in handling legal issues across Civil (Appellate), Criminal, and Writ Jurisdiction earned him a reputation as a competent and reliable lawyer.<a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\" title=\"5. Hon'ble Thiru. Justice M. M. Sundresh, Madras High Court.\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">His dedication and expertise in the field soon caught the attention of the Government of Tamil Nadu, which appointed him as the Counsel for the State Government. For a significant period, from 1991 to 1996, he served as the Government Advocate, representing the state in various legal matters. He also served as the Counsel for the Tamil Nadu Small Scale Industries Development Corporation.<a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\" title=\"6. Supra.\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As an advocate, Justice Sundresh was actively involved in various community initiatives. He was selected to be a Member of the Monitoring Committee, which oversaw the implementation of the Reverse Osmosis System in Thiruppur District, Karur District, and his hometown Erode.<a id=\"fnref7\" href=\"#fn7\" title=\"7. Supra.\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #c00000; color: #c00000;\">Career as a Judge<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In recognition of his exemplary legal career and dedication to the legal profession, Justice Sundresh&#8217;s elevation to the High Court of Judicature at Madras took place on 31 March 2009. His remarkable work on the bench led to his confirmation as a Permanent Judge on 29 March 2011.<a id=\"fnref8\" href=\"#fn8\" title=\"8. Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh, Supreme Court of India.\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After years of hard work, Justice M.M. Sundresh reached the pinnacle of his career when he was elevated as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 31 August 2021.<a id=\"fnref9\" href=\"#fn9\" title=\"9. Supra\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Did You Know?<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">During his 12-year stint as judge of Madras High Court, Justice Sundresh had disposed of 1,03,563 cases<\/span><\/span>.<a id=\"fnref10\" href=\"#fn10\" title=\"10. Never a verdict against my conscience: Justice M M Sundresh, The Times of India.\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #c00000; color: #c00000;\">Notable Judgements at Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Beyond Sabarimala: 9-Judge Bench Examines Validity of Parsi Excommunications Under Articles 25&#8212;26<\/p>\n<p>A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Court comprising of Surya Kant, CJ., B.V. Nagarathna, M.M Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Augustine George Masih, Prasanna B Varale, R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ., is hearing a seminal reference arising from the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Indian Young Lawyers Assn. (Sabarimala Temple-5J.)<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Kerala<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0yxYnLIV\" target=\"_blank\">(2019) 11 SCC 1<\/a>. The Bench has been considering foundational constitutional questions on the balance between individual religious freedom under Article 25 and denominational autonomy under Article 26, the permissibility of gender-based exclusions in matters of faith, and the extent to which courts may scrutinize excommunicatory practices, including those within the Parsi community.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/06\/supreme-court-sabrimala-reference\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Parvinder Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Enforcement Directorate<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vHMRmNCy\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 903<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ., held that the accused must be given an opportunity of hearing under the first proviso to Section 223(1), BNSS, even if the prosecution complaint itself had been filed prior to 1 July 2024. The Court clarified that failure to provide such hearing renders the cognizance order void ab initio.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Priyanka Sarkariya<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O6Zd9ClY\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 605<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a petition challenging preventive detention orders passed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001565790\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948292\" target=\"_blank\">Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974<\/a> (COFEPOSA) on the grounds of violation of constitutional and statutory safeguards governing preventive detention, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ., upheld the impugned detention orders, holding that the procedural safeguards mandated by the Constitution and COFEPOSA had been substantially complied with, the Detaining Authority had validly recorded subjective satisfaction, and no violation of the detenus&#8217; constitutional rights had been established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Syed Mohd. Ghouse Pasha Khadri<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Syed Mohd. Adil Pasha Khadri<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wTo8v18a\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 518<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a long-standing dispute related to the succession to the spiritual office of Sajjadanashin of the Hazarath Mardane-e-Gaib Dargah, (popularly known as the &#8220;Big Makan&#8221;) situated at Channapatna, Ramanagara District, where the Karnataka High Court by common judgment dated 16 December 2024 set aside concurrent findings of the trial court and First Appellate Court on the ground that civil courts lacked inherent jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes relating to the office of Sajjadanashin of a notified wakf institution as such jurisdiction was exclusively vested in the Wakf Board, the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and Vipul M. Pancholi, JJ., set aside the impugned judgment of High Court and restored the concurrent findings of the trial court and First Appellate Court, holding that civil court has jurisdiction to decide appointment of Sajjadanashin of Hazarath Mardane-e-Gaib Dargah.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The office of the mutawalli and Sajjadanashin cannot be said to be one and the same&#8230; Sajjadanashin is the spiritual head of Waqf and declaration of Sajjadanashin is a religious affair, however, role of Mutawalli of a Waqf only pertains to the administration and management of the Waqf.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/08\/sc-civil-court-has-jurisdiction-to-decide-appointment-of-sajjadanashin\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Satender Kumar Antil<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CBI<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/64lTbezC\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 162<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While considering this petition revolving around issues related to issuance of notices under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804072\" target=\"_blank\">35(3)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNSS) qua an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years; the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ., held that for effecting an arrest, regarding an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years, the mandate of Section 35(1)(b)(i) BNSS along with any one of the conditions mentioned in Section 35(1)(b)(ii) BNSS must be in existence. The Court emphasised that a notice under Section 35(3) BNSS to an accused or any individual concerned, qua offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years, is the rule.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/mandatory-issue-of-notice-under-s353-bnss-to-accused-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bunty Yadav<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Nx1MZAm5\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 166<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an application filed by the appellant seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 352 read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803655\" target=\"_blank\">3(5)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNS) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567304\" target=\"_blank\">25(1B)(a)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567305\" target=\"_blank\">26<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567306\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567315\" target=\"_blank\">35<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775593\" target=\"_blank\">Arms Act, 1959<\/a>, the Division Judge Bench of M.M Sundresh and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ., granted anticipatory bail to the appellant after considering the submissions and the fact that a cross case had already been previously registered by the appellant&#8217;s mother, in pursuance of a civil land dispute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/09\/sc-anticipatory-bail-granted-in-arms-act-case-amid-civil-dispute\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sushila Devi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cXx67Ic3\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2918<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a batch of petitions raising issues concerning dismissal of criminal appeals in Ajmer Sharif bomb blast case on the ground of delay and the slow progress of trial despite Court&#8217;s earlier directions, a Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ., directed the Rajasthan High Court to decide the impugned criminal appeals on merits notwithstanding delay and expedite the trial with day-to-day hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/sc-ajmer-sharif-blast-day-to-day-hearing-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Tuteja<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7g4AH9kp\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2110<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a batch of 13 special leave petitions (SLP) filed in connection with the Chhattisgarh liquor scam case, the division bench comprising M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. dismissed all the petitions. The SLPs challenged various FIRs registered in the States of Chhattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh, an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), as well as the rejection of bail applications, including one filed by IAS officer Anil Tuteja.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/sc-dismisses-13-slps-chhattisgarh-liquor-scam-anil-tuteja-bail\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M Jagan Moorthy<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Inspector of Police<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Bnvy4In9\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1393<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court: In a SLP filed by Tamil Nadu Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) &#8216;Poovai&#8217; M. Jagan Moorthy challenging the judgment of the Madras High Court&#8212;which had refused to grant him anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged abduction case involving a minor boy, a Division Bench of Manoj Misra and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ., while observing that the matter required consideration, granted anticipatory bail to Jagan Moorthy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/sc-anticipatory-bail-jagan-moorthy-abduction-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shubha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>,<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eeOkc2av\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1426<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While considering a criminal appeal challenging the imposition of life sentence imposed upon the accused who was charged for murdering her fianc&eacute;, by the High Court of Karnataka; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and Aravind Kumar, JJ., allowed the accused persons to seek pardon by filing appropriate petitions before the Governor of Karnataka.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The voice of a young ambitious girl, muffled by a forced family decision, created the fiercest of turmoil in her mind. This, backed by an unholy alliance of a mental rebellion and wild romanticism, led to the tragic murder of an innocent young man, while simultaneously destroying the lives of three others&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/23\/sc-permits-woman-convicted-for-fiancs-murder-to-seek-pardon\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye<\/span>, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/saxskYpT\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1193<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering a bunch of appeals concerning issues related to appointments and tenure in various consumer forums; the Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ., exercising the Court&#8217;s power under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574873\" target=\"_blank\">142<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, directed the Union of India to file an affidavit on the feasibility of a permanent adjudicatory forum for consumer disputes, either in the form of a Consumer Tribunal or a Consumer Court, within a period of 3 months, on the touchstone of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>al mandate.<\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that since the essence of consumerism is embedded within the Constitution, there is absolutely no reason to fill up the Consumer fora with tenure-based offices for the Staff, Members and Presidents. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">While we leave it to the wisdom of the Union of India to revamp the existing structure with holistic changes, we would only implore upon it, to appreciate the pressing need for a permanent structure<\/span>&#8221;. Consumer fora can be given permanency through permanent staff and officers, including Presidents and Members at different levels.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/23\/consider-feasibility-of-permanent-adjudicatory-forum-for-consumer-disputes-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Om Prakash<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j0duL48C\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 47<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While deliberating over the instant case wherein the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M Sundresh*<\/span> and Aravind Kumar, JJ., observed grave injustice that had been perpetrated on account of consistent failure on part of the judicial machinery to recognise and act upon the constitutional mandate vis-a-vis the plea of juvenility in the instant case and allowed the appeal and set aside the appellant&#8217;s sentence imposed in excess of the upper limit for commission of culpable homicide amounting to murder in 1994. In the instant case, the Court found that the appellant had undergone imprisonment for almost 25 years, during which time, the society has undergone significant transformation which the Appellant might be unaware of and find difficult to adjust with. Therefore, the Court directed the Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority to play a proactive role in identifying any welfare scheme of the State\/Central Government, facilitating the Appellant&#8217;s rehabilitation and smooth reintegration into the society upon his release, with particular emphasis on his right to livelihood, shelter and sustenance guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/14\/plea-of-juvenility-convict-25years-prison-release-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CBI<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Surendra Patwa<\/span><\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8omC55QR\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 934<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While considering the instant appeal wherein the issue pertained to the nature and scope of administrative actions initiated in pursuance of the Master Directions on Frauds &#8212; Classification and Reporting by commercial banks and select FIs, dated 1 July 2016 (Master Directions) vis-&agrave;-vis criminal proceedings initiated, against the respondents; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., clarified that there is an apparent distinction between the two. While the former (Master Directions) is within the domain of the RBI and the Complainant-Banks; the latter (criminal proceedings) is within the domain of the Appellant-CBI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/29\/administrative-action-violation-natural-justice-does-not-bar-administrative-action-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohd. Firoz Ahmad Khalid v. State of Manipur<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 875<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of <span style=\"color: #171617;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., considered whether<\/span> a Muslim Member of the Bar Council of the State or the Union territory, duly elected as a Member of the Waqf Board constituted under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560221\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835345\" target=\"_blank\">Wakf Act, 1995<\/a> (Wakf Act) can continue to hold the said position, even after the expiry of his tenure in the Bar Council. It was held that the State of Manipur deemed it fit to accept the membership of the appellant, who is admittedly serving as a Muslim Member of the Bar Council, to the Board. A Gazette notification had been issued by the Bar Council of Manipur, stating that the appellant had been elected as a Member of the Bar Council. Therefore, as such, a Member of the Bar Council was available, who was subsequently elected as a Member of the Board, in accordance with Section 14(1)(b)(iii) Wakf Act. Respondent No. 3, who is no longer holding the said post of a Muslim Member of the Bar Council, cannot be allowed to contend that even after he had ceased to be a Member of the Bar Council, he would be entitled to continue as a Member of the Board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001568781\" target=\"_blank\">6A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775594\" target=\"_blank\">Citizenship Act 1955<\/a>, In re<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7s30e6Yr\" target=\"_blank\">(2024) 16 SCC 105<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a writ petition concerning the constitutionality of Section 6-A, Citizenship Act, the 5-Judge Constitution Bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, CJI, Surya Kant*, MM Sundresh, JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ., upheld the validity of Section 6A in a 4:1 majority, with Justice Pardiwala giving the dissenting opinion. In this case, the Chief Justice authored the majority opinion, while Justice Surya Kant wrote a separate opinion that was joined by Justices M.M. Sundresh and Manoj Misra. Justice JB Pardiwala, on the other hand, gave a dissenting opinion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/22\/detailed-analysis-supreme-court-majority-verdict-section-6a-citizenship-act\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Saidul Sk.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B<\/span>.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VM0v75vf\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2734<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a criminal special leave petition against a decision of the Calcutta High Court, wherein the High Court, relying upon the witness of the injured person and giving credibility to her husband&#8217;s witness and herself, partially allowed the convicts&#8217; plea and refused to interfere with the sentence imposed on convict 1 and reduced the sentences of convicts 2 to 4 and upheld the conviction by the Trial Court for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561788\" target=\"_blank\">448<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561634\" target=\"_blank\">325<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), the Division Bench of MM Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, JJ. issued notice and exempted the convicts from surrendering.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/07\/sc-exempts-four-convicts-from-surrendering-before-trial-court-2013-assault-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/span> <\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">National Investigation Agency<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Owais Amin<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v48bOLLi\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 983<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While setting aside the impugned judgment insofar as it confirms the judgment of the Special Judge, NIA, in not taking cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 120-B, RPC, 1989, the division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M. M. Sundresh*<\/span> and S. V. N. Bhatti, JJ. held that while an investigation could continue after its initiation under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC, 1989<\/a>, by way of the application of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC, 1973<\/a>, it cannot be stated that even for a case where there was a clear non-compliance of the former, it can be ignored by the application of the latter.<\/p>\n<p>The Court said that while we are holding that the requirement of an authorization or an empowerment is mandatory for conveying a complaint, it being at the conclusion of investigation, would not preclude the investigating agency from complying with it thereafter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/20\/supreme-court-verdict-on-retrospective-applicability-of-crpc-in-jammu-kashmir\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Telangana<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohd. Abdul Qasim<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L9q4Wj5T\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 548<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the Telangana High Court judgment which set aside the concurrent judgments rendered by the Trial Court and the then High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh (1994 Judgment)., and held that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000642186\" target=\"_blank\">5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000644220\" target=\"_blank\">Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967<\/a> (A.P. Forest Act) which speaks about the bar of a suit can only be applied during the pendency of proceedings under the A.P. Forest Act and not thereafter, the division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh*<\/span> and SVN Bhatti, JJ., has set aside the impugned judgment and restored the judgement rendered in 1994. Further, it imposed a cost of Rs. 5,00,000\/- each on the State and respondents to be paid to the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) within a period of two months from the date of this judgment. Further, the Bench allowed the State to enquire into the lapses committed by the officers in filing collusive affidavits before the competent court and recover the same from those officers who are responsible for facilitating and filing incorrect affidavits in the ongoing proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Human beings indulge themselves in selective amnesia when it comes to fathom the significance of forests. It is the forests which give life to the Earth by replacing carbon dioxide with oxygen, thereby providing a hospitable environment for the steady growth of diverse life forms.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/22\/supreme-court-imposes-5-lakhs-cost-telangana-classic-case-officials-expected-protect-preserve-forests-abdicated-their-role\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harvinder Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of H.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1lJvp8hO\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1347<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an appeal challenging the conviction rendered for life imprisonment by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, by setting at naught the order of acquittal rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge (Presiding Officer), Fast Track Court, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is under challenge in these appeals, a division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and J.B. Pardiwala, JJ., set aside the conviction of a appellant for murder and held that Courts cannot assume that a witness has good reputation only because he is educated and God-fearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A court of law cannot declare the reputation of a person based upon its own opinion merely because a person is educated and said to be God-fearing, that by itself will not create a positive reputation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gurwinder Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0845b6hE\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(2024) 5 SCC 403<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an appeal challenging order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 24 April 2023 upholding the rejection of application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519740\" target=\"_blank\">439<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> for a matter involving offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561381\" target=\"_blank\">124-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\">153-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561417\" target=\"_blank\">153-B<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\">120-B<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561438\" target=\"_blank\">17<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561459\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561470\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808781\" target=\"_blank\">Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967<\/a> (UAPA) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567304\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> and 54, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775593\" target=\"_blank\">Arms Act, 1959<\/a>, the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, JJ. refused to grant bail while explaining the rule against bail delineating provisions under UAPA as against general rule under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/supreme-court-illuminates-bail-under-section-43d-5-of-uapa-against-crpc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sunder Lal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XP90wk9Y\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 112<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>While dealing with the question of whether a witness who had been shown on the prosecution list but not examined on behalf of the prosecution could be permitted for examination as a defense witness, Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ., clarified that there was no bar in law restricting such examination as defense witness and permitted the appellant to examine the prosecution witness as defense witness and kept it open for the prosecution to cross-examine the said witness.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Mere delay in trial pertaining to grave offences as one involved in the instant case cannot be used as a ground to grant bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/09\/no-bar-to-examine-discharged-prosecution-witness-as-defense-witness-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Debendra Paikar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/LgK4I2Xd\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 98<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an appeal against the High Court&#8217;s dismissal of appeal against Trial Court&#8217;s order of conviction for offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561687\" target=\"_blank\">366<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ. highlighted the discrepancy in the prosecution case and set aside the conviction. The Court held that both the Courts below <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;completely misread the material available on record&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/05\/know-what-led-supreme-court-set-aside-conviction-1996-rape-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arjun Gopal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oyNFzHWy\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1475<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an application seeking issuance of appropriate directions for the State of Rajasthan and particularly the District Administration of Udaipur to take immediate steps to prevent air pollution in Udaipur city, the Division Bench of A.S. Bopanna and M.M. Sundresh, JJ., clarified that the previous orders for mitigating air and noise pollution were applicable to all the States including the State of Rajasthan, not only restricted to the festive season but thereafter as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/10\/orders-steps-minimizing-air-noise-pollution-binding-all-states-after-festive-season-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Roopa Soni<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kamalnarayan Soni<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qoXn8w8r\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1127<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a civil appeal against the Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s judgment, affirming the Trial Court&#8217;s order, whereby a decree of divorce was declined to be granted to the appellant-wife, the Division Bench of Sanjiv Khanna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh,*<\/span> JJ., allowed the appeal and granted a decree of divorce and explained the scope of grant of divorce on grounds of &#8216;cruelty&#8217; under Hindu Marriage Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;What is cruelty for a woman, may not be cruelty for a man, and hence, a more elastic and broad approach is required when a wife seeks divorce.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/12\/sc-explains-grant-of-divorce-on-grounds-of-cruelty-under-hindu-marriage-act-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sharwan Kumar Kumawat<\/span>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5n7k9Y15\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 898<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>In batch of appeals filed to overturn the decision of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court declaring Rule 4(10) and Rule 7(3), Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 (&#8216;the Rules&#8217;) as unconstitutional, the division bench of A.S. Bopanna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh,*<\/span> JJ., said that the impugned Rules have been introduced in exercise of the power conferred under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001572407\" target=\"_blank\">15<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002845655\" target=\"_blank\">Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957<\/a> (&#8216;1957 Act&#8217;). There is neither a right nor does it get vested through an application made over a Government land. Further, it viewed that the High Court has totally misconstrued the issues ignoring the fact that there is a delegation of power to the State which was rightly exercised as conferred under Section 15, 1957 Act. Thus, the Court set aside the impugned judgments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/supreme-court-upholds-constitutionality-r-410-and-r-73-rajasthan-minor-mineral-concession-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Senthil Balaji<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6Isw9XF1\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(2024) 3 SCC 51<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a petition filed Tamil Nadu Electricity Minister Senthil Balaji and his wife, challenging the Madras High Court&#8217;s judgment, wherein the Court held that the Directorate of Enforcement (&#8216;ED&#8217;) was entitled to take Senthil Balaji into police custody, the division bench of AS Bopanna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh,*<\/span> JJ. has dismissed the said plea challenging ED custody in the money laundering case and allowed ED to have his custody till 12 August 2023 in connection with the cash-for-jobs scam. The Court held that the words &#8220;such custody&#8221; occurring in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519406\" target=\"_blank\">167(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> would include not only police custody but also that of other investigating agencies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/decoding-supreme-court-verdict-dismissing-v-senthil-balaji-plea-cash-for-job-scam-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nuruddin<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VE201zW9\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 52<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The division bench of Sanjiv Khanna and M.M. Sundresh J.J., exercising its power under the criminal appellate jurisdiction, set aside the impugned order passed by the Allahabad High Court granting bail to the respondent who had inflicted gunshot injuries on the appellant and subsequently also killed the elder brother of the appellant in broad day light.<\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that the Allahabad High Court erred in granting bail to the respondent, keeping in view the nature and gravity of the offence, the relationship between the parties and the prima facie evidence on record with reference to common intention as well as antecedents of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/24\/exercising-power-under-criminal-appellate-jurisdiction-set-aside-order-passed-by-allahabad-high-court-granting-bail-to-respondent-who-inflicted-gunshot-injuries-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sanjay<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g95r72O1\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 840<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a Special Leave Petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574865\" target=\"_blank\">136<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a> seeking interim relief against the order passed by Rajasthan High Court on 20 March 2023 refusing to grant interim bail for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570401\" target=\"_blank\">8<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570292\" target=\"_blank\">20<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570304\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985<\/a> after recovery of illegal Ganja of 173.05 Kg, the Division Bench of A.S. Bopanna and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. allowed interim bail of 6 weeks on medical grounds since the petitioner needed specialized treatment to treat spinal disorder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/ndps-act-supreme-court-grants-interim-bail-173-kg-ganja-recovery-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Career Institute Educational Society<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Om Shree Thakurji Educational Society<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/poHdfj24\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 586<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a special leave petition against the judgment and order passed by the Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court, the division bench of Sanjiv Khanna and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. while dismissing the petition, reiterated that it is not everything said by a Judge when giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge&#8217;s decision binding as a legal precedent is the principle upon which the case is decided and, for this reason, it is important to analyse a decision and isolate from it the obiter dicta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/06\/not-everything-said-in-a-judgment-constitutes-precedent-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Texco Marketing (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd<\/span>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Qof2j5U9\" target=\"_blank\">2023) 1 SCC 428<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an appeal against the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (&#8216;NCDRC&#8217;), wherein the commission having found a deficiency in service; placed reliance upon the exclusion clause in setting aside the decision of the State Commission while granting a sum of Rs. 7.5 lakhs to the appellant, division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and Surya Kant, JJ. held that non-compliance of Clauses (3) and (4), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Protection of Policy Holder&#8217;s Interests, Regulation 2002) Act (&#8216;IRDA Regulation, 2002&#8217;) preceded by unilateral inclusion, and thereafter followed by the execution of the contract, receiving benefits, and repudiation after knowing that it was entered into for the basement, would certainly be an act of unfair trade practice. Thus, the Court set aside the impugned order passed by NCDRC, except to the extent of declining a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs towards harassment and mental agony.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/supreme-court-exclusion-clause-destroying-the-contract-entered-with-knowledge-cannot-be-permitted-to-be-used-by-a-party-who-introduced-it-to-avoid-its-liability-legal-research-le\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Satender Kumar Antil<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CBI<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tg4hS0uO\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 10 SCC 51<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The division bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has asked the Government of India to consider the introduction of an Act specifically meant for granting of bail, as done in various other countries like the United Kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>The Court took note of the statistics that show that jails in India are flooded with undertrial prisoners with more than 2\/3rd of the inmates of the prisons constituting undertrial prisoners. Of this category of prisoners, majority may not even be required to be arrested despite registration of a cognizable offense, being charged with offenses punishable for seven years or less. They are not only poor and illiterate but also would include women. Statistics also show that more than 1000 children are living in prisons along with their mothers. Granting bail in such cases is not only in the interest of the accused, but also the children who are not expected to get exposed to the prisons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Criminal courts in general with the trial court in particular are the guardian angels of liberty. Liberty, as embedded in the Code, has to be preserved, protected, and enforced by the Criminal Courts. Any conscious failure by the Criminal Courts would constitute an affront to liberty. It is the pious duty of the Criminal Court to zealously guard and keep a consistent vision in safeguarding the constitutional values and ethos.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/24\/supreme-court-asks-centre-to-enact-bail-act-layes-down-guidelines-for-disposal-of-bail-applications-legal-news-updates-research-criminal-law\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CCI<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Mizoram<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l4GjQ7uX\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 7 SCC 73<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While adjudicating the dispute with regard to jurisdiction of CCI to inquire into allegations of bid rigging, collusive bidding, and cartelisation in the tender process for appointment of selling agents and distributors for lotteries organised in the State of Mizoram the Division Bench of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and M.M. Sundresh, JJ., concluded that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Lotteries may be a regulated commodity and may even be res extra commercium; that would not take away the aspect of something which is anti-competition in the context of the business related to lotteries.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/whether-lotteries-being-res-extra-commercium-takes-away-ccis-jurisdiction-to-entertain-anti-competition-activities-relating-to-lotteries-sc-decides\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Uttarakhand<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sudhir Budakoti<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O6Gkm3lG\" target=\"_blank\"> (2022) 13 SCC 256<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has held that when there is a reasonable basis for a classification adopted by taking note of the exigencies and diverse situations, the Court is not expected to insist on absolute equality by taking a rigid and pedantic view as against a pragmatic one.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/08\/mere-differential-treatment-cannot-on-its-own-be-termed-as-an-anathema-to-article-14-of-the-constitution-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manpreet Singh Poonam<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g7440U06\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 6 SCC 105<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has observed that a right to promotion and subsequent benefits and seniority would arise only with respect to the rules governing the said promotion, and not a different set of rules which might apply to a promoted post facilitating further promotion which is governed by a different set of rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;&#8230;a right to promotion and subsequent benefits and seniority would arise only with respect to the rules governing the said promotion, and not a different set of rules which might apply to a promoted post facilitating further promotion which is governed by a different set of rules.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/retrospective-promotion\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bank of Baroda<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">MBL Infrastructures Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8CmSIzz6\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 5 SCC 661<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a case were the Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ., was sought to provide judicial interpretation of Section 29A(h) IBC, as amended by the Act, 2018, the Bench held that ineligibility has to be seen from the point of view of the resolution process. It can never be said that there can be ineligibility qua one creditor as against others. Rather, the ineligibility is to the participation in the resolution process of the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n<p>The Bench remarked, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;&#8230;what is required to earn a disqualification under the said provision is a mere existence of a personal guarantee that stands invoked by a single creditor, notwithstanding the application being filed by any other creditor seeking initiation of insolvency resolution process subject to further compliance of invocation of the said personal guarantee by any other creditor.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/05\/ibc-amendment-2018-supreme-court-elaborates-conditions-for-disqualification-of-resolution-professional-under-s-29ah-of-ibc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">U.N. Bora<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Assam Roller Flour Mills Assn.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2E6WnoC5\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 1 SCC 101<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the case dealing with willful disobedience of the order passed by the Supreme Court in the year 2008 with respect to the levy made while upholding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001584442\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002879962\" target=\"_blank\">Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972<\/a>, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh*<\/span>,JJ has held that vicarious liability as a principle cannot be applied to a case of contempt and that the appellants cannot be implicated for alleged action of their subordinates.<\/p>\n<p>The Court noticed that in the present case, it was the specific case of the appellants that they did not violate the directives of the court. Also, there was no material to either establish their knowledge on the action of their subordinates, or that they acted in collusion with each other.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Merely because a subordinate official acted in disregard of an order passed by the Court, a liability cannot be fastened on a higher official in the absence of knowledge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/27\/vicarious-liability-in-a-contempt-case-contempt-jurisdiction-knows-no-such-concept-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jogi Ram<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suresh Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eyaS9NfD\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 4 SCC 274<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a half a century old case relating to a Will, the bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and MM Sundresh, JJ has held that the objective of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001548241\" target=\"_blank\">14(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002810434\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Succession Act, 1956<\/a> is to create an absolute interest in case of a limited interest of the wife. The objective cannot be that a Hindu male who owned self-acquired property is unable to execute a Will giving a limited estate to a wife if all other aspects including maintenance are taken care of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;If we were to hold so it would imply that if the wife is disinherited under the Will it would be sustainable but if a limited estate is given it would mature into an absolute interest irrespective of the intent of the testator.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/can-a-hindu-male-execute-a-will-giving-a-limited-estate-to-a-wife-if-all-other-aspects-including-maintenance-are-taken-care-of-sc-interprets-section-14-of-hindu-succession-act\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jasdeep Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Munhc8QH\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 2 SCC 545<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Drawing an interesting analogy to explain the scope of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has said that it is a team effort akin to a game of football involving several positions manned by many, such as defender, mid-fielder, striker, and a keeper.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A striker may hit the target, while a keeper may stop an attack. The consequence of the match, either a win or a loss, is borne by all the players, though they may have their distinct roles. A goal scored or saved may be the final act, but the result is what matters. As against the specific individuals who had impacted more, the result is shared between the players. The same logic is the foundation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> which creates shared liability on those who shared the common intention to commit the crime.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/a-team-effort-akin-to-a-game-of-football-supreme-courts-interesting-analogy-explaining-section-34-of-ipc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dalbir<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HU84fTJ9\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 1037<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Opining that the advancement of medical field over a period of time has been enormous, the Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ., directed the Railways to constitute a committee to revisit its decision disqualifying persons with history of lasik surgery for the post of constables (RPF).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/07\/is-railways-decision-to-disqualify-persons-with-history-of-lasik-surgery-for-the-post-of-constables-rpf-just-and-reasonable-sc-directs-constitution-of-experts-committee-to-answer\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7vuiB6OW\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 852<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a big development, the bench of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and MM Sundresh, JJ has directed that the infamous gangster\/terrorist Abu Salem be released after the completion of 25 years of his sentence in terms of the national commitment as well as the principle based on comity of courts. Salem was convicted on 12 October 2005.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/abu-salem-to-be-released-from-prison-after-completition-of-25-years-of-sentence-supreme-court-legal-updates-knowledge-research-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Nrtx6Wa8\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 12 SCC 619<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Reminding the Courts of the importance of hierarchy of Courts, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has held that the Appellate Court shall not expect the trial court to act in a particular way depending upon the sensitivity of the case. Rather it should be appreciated if a trial court decides a case on its own merit despite its sensitivity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Every case has its own journey towards the truth and it is the Court&#8217;s role undertake. Truth has to be found on the basis of evidence available before it. There is no room for subjectivity nor the nature of offence affects its performance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/14\/trial-courts-have-freedom-of-mind-to-decide-sensitive-cases-on-merit-appellate-courts-must-refrain-from-reversing-acquittal-just-for-the-sake-of-it-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karunesh Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ikIeDOx4\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine SC 1706<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ina case where, the State of Uttar Pradesh assailed the order of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court which stated that the literal interpretation of Rule 15, Uttar Pradesh Gram Panchayat Adhikari Service Rules, 1978 (1978 Rules) would facilitate consideration of those candidates who were not part of the list which was forwarded by the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission (&#8216;the Commission&#8217;), to be considered for vacancies for the post of Gram Panchayat Adhikari, Single Cadre, Group (C), pursuant to the selected candidates which were approved by the appointing authority not taking up on the offer, the division bench of M.R. Shah and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh,*<\/span> JJ., held that the Allahabad High Court did not take note of the grounds raised in the review petition, thus, set aside both the aforesaid orders and restored the order passed by the Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/service-law-recruitment-process-challenge-after-participating-in-interview-not-allowed-supreme-court-gram-panchayat-adhikari-uttar-pradesh-legal-updates-news-research\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Principal Abhay Nadan Inter College<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bmN9b0qn\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 15 SCC 600<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ., had set aside Allahabad High Court&#8217;s decision whereby the High Court had declared the Regulation 101 framed under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000734819\" target=\"_blank\">Intermediate Education Act, 1921<\/a> as unconstitutional. The Bench expressed, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;we have already noted the fact that &#8220;Outsourcing&#8221; as a matter of policy is being introduced throughout the State. It is one thing to say that it has to be given effect to with caution as recommended by the Seventh Central Pay Commission, and another to strike it down as unconstitutional.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/01\/supreme-court-sets-aside-allahabad-hcs-decision-declaring-regulation-101-framed-under-intermediate-education-act-unconstitutional\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Taijuddin<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Assam<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wd7AiK3O\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 1 SCC 395<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a case where an accused merely pointed to the house where the victim was hiding, thereby helping a fully armed &#8220;murderous mob&#8221; locate the victim, the bench of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and MM Sundresh, JJ has held that the mere fact that the accused was not brave enough to conceal where the victim was hiding did not make him a part of the unlawful assembly under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\">149<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/04\/does-pointing-towards-victims-hiding-place-make-one-a-part-of-a-murderous-unlawful-assembly-not-brave-enough-at-most-holds-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhupesh Rathod<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dayashankar Prasad Chaurasiya<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/232LeH15\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 2 SCC 355<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a case relating to dishonour of cheques where it was alleged that the complaint was filed by the managing director in his personal capacity and not on behalf of the Company, the bench of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and MM Sundresh, JJ has held that there could be a format where the Company&#8217;s name is described first, suing through the Managing Director but there cannot be a fundamental defect merely because the name of the Managing Director is stated first followed by the post held in the Company. It was further held that it would be too technical a view to take to defeat the complaint merely because the body of the complaint does not elaborate upon the authorisation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/section-138-ni-act-cant-defeat-the-complaint-merely-because-it-does-not-elaborate-upon-managing-directors-authorisation-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">U.N. Bora<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Assam Roller Flour Mills Assn.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Jhp140l1\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 1 SCC 101<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the case dealing with willful disobedience of the order passed by the Supreme Court in the year 2008 with respect to the levy made while upholding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001584442\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002879962\" target=\"_blank\">Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972<\/a>, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has held that vicarious liability as a principle cannot be applied to a case of contempt and that the appellants cannot be implicated for alleged action of their subordinates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/27\/vicarious-liability-in-a-contempt-case-contempt-jurisdiction-knows-no-such-concept-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Prabhakara<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Basavaraj K.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/E9VHgTzz\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 1 SCC 115<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Holding that a testamentary court is not a court of suspicion but that of conscience, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> MM Sundresh*<\/span>, JJ has set aside the High Court&#8217;s order in a suit for execution of Will wherein the Court had &#8220;unnecessarily created a suspicion when there is none&#8221;, merely because it thought that was no logic in the exclusion of the sister of the beneficiary of the Will. Neither the beneficiary nor his siblings had raised any issues regarding the validity of the Will.<\/p>\n<p>Asking the appellate Courts to consider the relevant materials instead of adopting an ethical reasoning, the Court explained,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A mere exclusion of either brother or sister per se would not create a suspicion unless it is surrounded by other circumstances creating an inference. In a case where a testatrix is accompanied by the sister of the beneficiary of the Will and the said document is attested by the brother, there is no room for any suspicion when both of them have not raised any issue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/appellate-courts-cant-unnecessarily-create-a-suspicion-in-absence-of-objection-to-validity-of-a-will-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;.<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suraz India Trust<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>,<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3B7XpQ62\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 20 SCC 718<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Coming down heavily upon a contemnor, the bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kishan Kaul*<\/span> and MM Sundresh, JJ has held that the power to punish for contempt is a constitutional power vested in this Court which cannot be abridged or taken away even by legislative enactment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Such litigants cannot be permitted to have their way only because they can plead and write anything they feel like and keep on approbating by sometimes apologising and then again bringing forth those allegations.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/01\/you-are-throwing-mud-at-all-and-sundry-but-we-refuse-to-back-off-supreme-court-holds-suraz-india-trust-chairman-guilty-of-contempt\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">B. Sailesh Saxena<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V9gWVl28\" target=\"_blank\">2021 SCC OnLine SC 3332<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. dismissed a writ petition filed by an advocate seeking to stall elevation of a judicial officer as a Judge of the Telangana High Court. The Supreme Court said that the petition was a gross abuse of the process of law and imposed costs of Rs 5 lakh on the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/advocate-trying-to-stall-elevation-of-judicial-officer-as-judge-of-telangana-hc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Notable Judgements at Madras High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M. Padmanabhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">District Collector<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y2uS5Rj3\" target=\"_blank\">2021 SCC OnLine Mad 698<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and S. Ananthi, JJ., held that temple shall not be a place for perpetuating communal separation leading to discrimination, on the other hand, it should facilitate all those persons having common faith to come and worship.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"> &#8220;The classification among men has got no place in the aboard of God.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/18\/communal-separation\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bharaneeswaran<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Government of Tamil Nadu<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NsLBR3F3\" target=\"_blank\">2020 SCC OnLine Mad 2301<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and R. Hemalatha, JJ., disposed of the petitions with regard to concerns arising due to online classes, stating that it hopes the above-laid guidelines are complied with and makes it clear that all the directions are applicable to the Schools functioning in the Tamil Nadu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A great nation is built on a character of its own citizens. It transforms into the character of the nation leading to its progress achieved through a value system.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/11\/online-classes-madras-hc-schools-can-allow-group-of-students-identified-by-them-requiring-special-attendance-in-view-of-difficulties-faced-in-online-digital-education-to-attend-physical-classes\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bader Sayeed<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/6c7R5mTp\" target=\"_blank\"> 2017 SCC OnLine Mad 74<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While examining the validity of certificates issued by the Kazis in the country in general and in Tamil Nadu in particular in respect of Talaq, the Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J., and M.M. Sundresh, J., held that for purposes of the courts and legal proceedings, the certificate in respect of Talaq issued by Chief Kazi is only an opinion and has no legal sanctity in view Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001530918\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002928166\" target=\"_blank\">Kazis Act, 1880<\/a> according to which the office of Kazi does not confer on the person any judicial or administrative power.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/19\/talaq-certificate-issued-by-the-chief-kazi-is-only-an-opinion-and-has-no-legal-sanctity\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">N. Selvathirumal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>,<span style=\"font-style: italic; color: #ff0000;\"><\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Mad_1624\" target=\"_blank\">2016 SCC OnLine Mad 1624<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Taking a landmark step, the Division Bench of the Court comprising of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> S.K. Kaul*<\/span>, C.J. and M.M. Sundresh, J., directed the schools affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and the private schools in the state of Tamil Nadu to make the singing of the National Anthem as an integral part of their curriculum.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/14\/cbse-affiliated-schools-and-private-schools-of-tamil-nadu-directed-to-include-singing-of-the-national-anthem-in-their-school-curriculum\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Vasanthakumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">H.C. Bhatia<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_Mad_300\" target=\"_blank\">2015 SCC OnLine Mad 300<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While dismissing a petition with regard to the setting up of National Court of Appeal as suggested by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bihar Legal Support Society<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chief Justice of India<\/span><\/span>, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/1986_4_SCC_767\" target=\"_blank\">(1986) 4 SCC 767 <\/a><\/span>, the Division Bench of S.K. Kaul, C.J. and M.M. Sundresh, J., stated that setting up of a National Court of Appeal is a matter of legislation and constitutional amendment, therefore, repeated agitations by the petitioner for reconsideration on the same by filing petitions is needless and thus not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/17\/petition-concerning-constitution-of-national-court-of-appeal-dismissed\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">C. Udayachandrika<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Secy., T.N. Legislative Assembly<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_Mad_194\" target=\"_blank\">2015 SCC OnLine Mad 194<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the instant case where the petitioner appearing in person praying to the Court to declare the notification issued by the Tamil Nadu Gazette, Extraordinary No.223 dated 8 November 2014 stating that former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Selvi J. The Court observed that such frivolous petitions are to be penalized by imposing exemplary costs but, since the petitioner committed this misadventure for the first time therefore, she was let off only with a caution so as to dissuade her to pursue any such frivolous petitions under the garb of a Public Interest Litigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/16\/nullification-of-tamil-nadu-gazette-notification-declaring-jayalalitha-s-constituency-to-be-vacant-from-the-date-of-her-conviction-denied\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Solaimalai<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tamil Nadu Forest Plantation Corp. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jPsRp2PR\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine Mad 3883<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Nature, unaware that this Nature he&#8217;s destroying is this God he&#8217;s worshiping.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: right;\">&#8211; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Hubert Reeves<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A Division Bench of Justices <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.M. Sundresh*<\/span> and N. Sathish Kumar had ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation probe into a series of elephant poaching incidents reported in the State. They also observed the network involved was cutting across boundaries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Wisdom requires that it should be left in the hands of man of knowledge in that field with the coordination of all the stake holders and this Court as well. Therefore, we are inclined to appoint a Committee consisting of Experts in various fields to address the larger issues such as banning the plastic in the forest zone, prohibiting the polluted vehicles to ply, employing the local population, increasing the strength of the staff, creating a strong seed bank, evolving measures to be adopted in removal and rehabilitation, priority of the area which requires immediate attention, areas requiring specific action, mapping of the entire area, possibility of using any other fund towards achievement of the task, utilising the removed plants and trees towards the object, creating a specific cell to be decided by the Government, disposal of the removed species and strengthening the indigenous species.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judge who has penned the judgment.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Shubha v. State of Karnataka, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002769089\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1426<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in\/mmsj.html\" target=\"_blank\">Hon&#8217;ble Thiru. Justice M. M. Sundresh<\/a>, Madras High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\">Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh<\/a>, Supreme Court of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> Supra.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in\/mmsj.html\" target=\"_blank\">Hon&#8217;ble Thiru. Justice M. M. Sundresh<\/a>, Madras High Court.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> Supra.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> Supra.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges\" target=\"_blank\">Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh<\/a>, Supreme Court of India.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> Supra<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/city\/chennai\/never-a-verdict-against-my-conscience-justice-m-m-sundresh\/articleshow\/85706327.cms\" target=\"_blank\">Never a verdict against my conscience: Justice M M Sundresh<\/a>, The Times of India.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Justice M.M. Sundresh&#8217;s journey from a small town to the highest echelons of the Indian judiciary serves as an inspiration to many aspiring legal minds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":390984,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38347],"tags":[50162,50169,45901,59560,2567,110379,34169,110378],"class_list":["post-390980","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judges-information","tag-abu-salem","tag-consumer-court","tag-environment-law","tag-justice-m-m-sundresh","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-pardon-sabarimala-verdict","tag-supreme-court-of-india","tag-v-senthil-balaji-money-laundering"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":7224,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Abu Salem\",\"consumer court\",\"Environment law\",\"Justice M.M. Sundresh\",\"Madras High Court\",\"pardon; Sabarimala verdict\",\"Supreme Court of India\",\"V Senthil Balaji. money laundering\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Know thy Judge\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/\",\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Justice M.M. Sundresh\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/21\\\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh | SCC Times","description":"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments","og_description":"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments","datePublished":"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/"},"wordCount":7224,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp","keywords":["Abu Salem","consumer court","Environment law","Justice M.M. Sundresh","Madras High Court","pardon; Sabarimala verdict","Supreme Court of India","V Senthil Balaji. money laundering"],"articleSection":["Know thy Judge"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/","name":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-21T09:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-21T09:33:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Explore the life,career and notable judgments of Justice M.M. Sundresh, Judge Supreme Court of India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Justice M.M. Sundresh"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/21\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-justice-m-m-sundresh\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice M.M. Sundresh\u2019s Inspiring Career and Notable Judgments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Justice-M.M.-Sundresh.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390980","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=390980"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390980\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":390982,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390980\/revisions\/390982"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/390984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=390980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=390980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=390980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}