{"id":390846,"date":"2026-07-20T13:00:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-20T07:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=390846"},"modified":"2026-07-20T15:52:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-20T10:22:27","slug":"computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court:<\/span> In a first appeal under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569576\" target=\"_blank\">173(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\">Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> (MV Act), against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Division Bench of Jayant Banerji and Tara Vitasta Ganju, JJ., partly allowed the appeal and held that all dependents of the deceased are required to be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act, irrespective of their strict legal status. Observing that the deceased&#8217;s second wife and minor daughter were also dependent on his income, the Court enhanced the compensation from &#8377;15.10 lakhs to &#8377;30.12 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/03\/motor-accident-claim-annual-income-assessment-using-itr-sc\/\">How ITRs can be used to assess annual income of deceased persons in Motor Accident Claims? Supreme Court lays down the method<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appeal arose from the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal granting compensation of &#8377;15,10,000 to the appellants for the death of a 34-year-old man in a motor vehicle accident. The claim petition had been instituted by the deceased&#8217;s first wife and mother, while the deceased&#8217;s alleged second wife and minor daughter were impleaded as respondents, claiming to be his dependents. Although the Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the disputed marital status between the 2 women, the Tribunal treated all 4 claimants as dependents for the purpose of computing loss of dependency. However, the Tribunal declined to apportion the compensation and assessed the deceased&#8217;s notional monthly income at &#8377;10,000, awarding compensation with interest at 9 per cent per annum. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation, the appellants preferred the present appeal, contending that the Tribunal ought to have adopted the notional income of &#8377;14,000 for the year 2019 in terms of the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority guidelines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Issue<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether Respondents 3 and 4 could be considered dependents for determining loss of dependency and whether the Tribunal had correctly awarded compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/29\/karnataka-hc-enhances-compensation-coolie-motor-accident-claim\/\">&#8220;Income of No Person Can Remain Static&#8221;: Karnataka HC Enhances Compensation Awarded to Coolie in Motor Accident Claim<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that while the appellants were the deceased&#8217;s wife and mother, it was undisputed that the deceased was also survived by his second wife and minor daughter, who were dependent on him. The Tribunal had, therefore, treated all 4 persons as dependents for computing the loss of dependency.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the issue regarding <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">who can be treated as a dependent under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\">MV Act<\/a> is no longer res integra<\/span>. Referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gujarat SRTC<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramanbhai Prabhatbhai<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/I3kh1a94\">(1987) 3 SCC 234<\/a>, the Court reiterated that the expression &#8220;legal representative&#8221; under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\">MV Act<\/a> is of wider meaning and is not confined to the spouse, parents or children of the deceased. Every person representing the estate of the deceased and suffering on account of the death in a motor vehicle accident is entitled to seek compensation. Referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">N. Jayasree<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ae4YK2tm\">(2022) 14 SCC 712<\/a>, the Court found that, for maintaining a claim under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569568\" target=\"_blank\">166<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\">MV Act<\/a>, it is sufficient to establish loss of dependency, and that the deduction towards personal expenses depends on the facts of each case rather than the claimant&#8217;s relationship with the deceased. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The Court reiterated that dependency, and not strict legal status or heirship, is the determinative factor for awarding compensation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the notional income of the deceased for the year 2019 was &#8377;14,000 per month, and that the age of the deceased was 34, the applicable multiplier was 16, and 40 per cent was liable to be added towards future prospects. Applying the settled principles of law, the Court observed that since Respondents 3 and 4 were also dependents of the deceased, they were required to be included while computing the loss of dependency.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Allowing the appeal in part, the Court modified the Tribunal&#8217;s award by enhancing the compensation by &#8377;15,02,400, thereby increasing the total compensation to &#8377; 30,12,400, together with interest at 9 per cent per annum from the date of the claim petition till realisation. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with interest within 8 weeks, while the remaining portions of the Tribunal&#8217;s award were left undisturbed. The Court further directed that, upon deposit, the enhanced amount be released to the claimants in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramakrishna S. Ghatge<\/span>, MFA No. 4119 of 2021, decided on 16-7-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the appellants:<\/span> G.J. Sunkapur, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> H.S. Lingaraj, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court Enhanced the Motor Accident Compensation from &#8377;15 Lakhs to &#8377;30 Lakhs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67543,"featured_media":390847,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31699,72030,34102,42258,3354,78660,32663,28334,38630,35968,36705,35969,44709,19791,33549,110257,31152,21954],"class_list":["post-390846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-31699","tag-compensation-enhancement","tag-dependents","tag-future-prospects","tag-heirs","tag-insurance-liability","tag-just-compensation","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-legal-representative","tag-loss-of-dependency","tag-minor-daughter","tag-motor-accident-claims-tribunal-mact","tag-motor-accident-compensation","tag-motor-vehicles-act","tag-notional-income","tag-personal-expenses-deduction","tag-second-wife","tag-section-166"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.0 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka HC holds all dependents must be considered for computing loss of dependency under MV Act| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ankita Kumari\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ankita Kumari\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ankita Kumari\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770\"},\"headline\":\"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":767,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"1988\",\"compensation enhancement\",\"dependents\",\"future prospects\",\"heirs\",\"Insurance Liability\",\"just compensation\",\"Karnataka High Court\",\"Legal Representative\",\"loss of dependency\",\"Minor Daughter\",\"Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)\",\"motor accident compensation\",\"Motor Vehicles Act\",\"Notional Income\",\"Personal Expenses Deduction\",\"second wife\",\"Section 166\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC holds all dependents must be considered for computing loss of dependency under MV Act| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Computation of loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/20\\\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770\",\"name\":\"Ankita Kumari\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ankita Kumari\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/ankita-kumari\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC holds all dependents must be considered for computing loss of dependency under MV Act| SCC Times","description":"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC","og_description":"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ankita Kumari","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ankita Kumari","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/"},"author":{"name":"Ankita Kumari","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770"},"headline":"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC","datePublished":"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/"},"wordCount":767,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp","keywords":["1988","compensation enhancement","dependents","future prospects","heirs","Insurance Liability","just compensation","Karnataka High Court","Legal Representative","loss of dependency","Minor Daughter","Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)","motor accident compensation","Motor Vehicles Act","Notional Income","Personal Expenses Deduction","second wife","Section 166"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/","name":"Karnataka HC holds all dependents must be considered for computing loss of dependency under MV Act| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-20T07:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T10:22:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770"},"description":"Karnataka HC holds all dependents, including a second wife and minor daughter, must be considered while computing loss of dependency under the Motor Vehicles Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Computation of loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/07\/20\/computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-motor-vehicles-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dependency, Not Legal Status, Governs Computation of Loss of Dependency; Second Wife and Minor Daughter Held Entitled to Compensation under MV Act: Karnataka HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a983c394088f73d0d35f9f6af3a4770","name":"Ankita Kumari","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/61287afbb38990ef798009235c546852c3eadc558bed9bb8c92b43d5aaea0bb8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ankita Kumari"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/ankita-kumari\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Computation-of-loss-of-dependency-under-Motor-Vehicles-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67543"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=390846"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390846\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":390888,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390846\/revisions\/390888"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/390847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=390846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=390846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=390846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}