{"id":388425,"date":"2026-06-24T17:00:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T11:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=388425"},"modified":"2026-06-24T16:40:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T11:10:20","slug":"ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/","title":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-family: ED Garamond;\">Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act<\/p>"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Central Consumer Protection Authority:<\/span> Taking suo moto cognizance of sale of non BIS certified toys on an E-commerce platform by Stallion Trading Company (Opposite Party), the Bench comprising Nidhi Khare, Chief Commissioner and Anupam Mishra, Commissioner, held that the sale of uncertified toys contravened the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001083855\" target=\"_blank\">Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020<\/a>, posed a serious risk to consumer safety, and constituted an unfair trade practice &#8212; thereby warranting regulatory action against the seller.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">The CCPA (Central Consumer Protection Authority) took <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">suo motu cognizance<\/span> of the sale of toys on Snapdeal (an e-commerce platform) that did not conform to BIS Standards, as mandated under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001083855\" target=\"_blank\">Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020<\/a> [QCO,2020] which prohibits sale of such toys that can be dangerous, hazardous or likely to cause injury or harm to consumers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">Under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214222\" target=\"_blank\">18(2)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214223\" target=\"_blank\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>, the CCPA conducted a preliminary inquiry against Stallion Trading Company and found that despite the QCO, 2020 coming into force on <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1-1-2021<\/span>, the Opposite Party had failed to ensure compliance and continued to sell non-BIS certified toys through the platform.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">Consequently a show cause notice dated <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">12-6-2023<\/span> was issued to the Opposite Party, which responded on the same day, stating that it had ceased selling such toys upon becoming aware of BIS requirements.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">Thereafter, a detailed investigation was undertaken on <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">13-6-2023<\/span>, which revealed that the Opposite Party had indulged in limited sales of non-compliant toys on Snapdeal during 2022 and 2023. Based on the investigation The CCPA continued to conduct its investigation, inquiry and adjudication.<\/p>\n<h3>Issues<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: ED Garamond;\">1. Whether the sale of non-BIS certified toys through an e-commerce platform violates the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001083855\" target=\"_blank\">Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020<\/a><\/span> and provisions of the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">BIS Act, 2016.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: ED Garamond;\">2. Whether such sale of non-compliant toys amounts to a <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">defect in goods under<\/span> Section 2(10)<\/span> and an <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">unfair trade practice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214224\" target=\"_blank\">2(47)<\/a><\/span> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: ED Garamond; margin-bottom: 3%;\">3. Whether the Opposite Party failed to ensure <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">mandatory statutory compliance and due diligence<\/span> in listing and selling toys on the platform.<\/p>\n<h3>CCPA&#8217;s Assessment and Findings<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">The CCPA observed that, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001083855\" target=\"_blank\">Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020<\/a>, which came into force on 1-1-2021 mandates BIS certification for all toys and any sale in contravention thereof amounts to breach of statutory safety standards under the BIS Act, 2016.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">The Authority further noted that the Opposite Party had failed to exercise due diligence and had permitted the sale of non-BIS certified toys on the e-commerce platform in violation of mandatory compliance requirements.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">The Authority emphasised that toys are a sensitive product category intended for children, and non-compliance is a potential risk to consumer safety and therefore deserves strict regulatory scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">It further held that such conduct is a &#8220;defect&#8221; as defined under Section 2(10) and an unfair trade practice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214224\" target=\"_blank\">2(47)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">In doing so, the Authority reasserted the principle of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">caveat venditor i.e.<\/span> &#8220;let the seller beware&#8221;, reaffirming that the burden of ensuring product safety, quality, and transparency rests squarely on the shoulders of seller and the facilitating platform. Hence, the onus is on the platform and the seller to ensure that every listed product meets the safety and quality standards such as BIS certification for toys and it remains vicariously liable for any deficiency in service or defect in goods that each the consumer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">Accordingly, the CCPA concluded that the Opposite Party had failed to ensure statutory compliance, resulting in the sale of defective goods and unfair trade practice affecting consumer safety.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">Consequently, the CCPA held that Stallion Trading Company had engaged in unfair trade practice, false and misleading advertisement as envisaged under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000214317\" target=\"_blank\">Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a> and imposed a penalty of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rs 1,000 (one thousand)<\/span> along with directions to ensure strict compliance with mandatory BIS standards in future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-family: ED Garamond;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the matter of Stallion Trading Company with regard to sale of non-compliant BIS Standard Toys<\/span>, Case No: CCPA-2\/11\/2023-CCPA (Part 1), decided on 23-4-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"font-family: ED Garamond;\">Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; font-family: ED Garamond;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Stallion Trading Company:<\/span> Memon Hamza, Proprietor<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Central Consumer Protection Authority in exercise of its powers under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, took suo motu cognizance against Stallion Trading Company for sale of Toys on Snapdeal (an E-Commerce platform) which allegedly do not conform to BIS standards as made mandatory under Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":388428,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43394,108090,42625,108094,108089,108088,108095,108092,44652,108091,108093],"class_list":["post-388425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-43394","tag-bis-non-compliance-case","tag-central-consumer-protection-authority","tag-consumer-protection-enforcement-action","tag-mr-anupam-mishra","tag-ms-nidhi-khare","tag-sale-of-non-certified-toys","tag-snapdeal-seller-violation","tag-suo-moto-cognizance","tag-toys-quality-control-order","tag-unfair-trade-practice-proceedings"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>CCPA Acts Against Snapdeal for Sale of Non-BIS-Certified Toys | Consumer Protection<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"&lt;p style=&quot;font-family: ED Garamond;&quot;&gt;Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act&lt;\/p&gt;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":667,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"2020\",\"BIS non-compliance case\",\"Central Consumer Protection Authority\",\"Consumer protection enforcement action\",\"Mr Anupam Mishra\",\"Ms Nidhi Khare\",\"Sale of non-certified toys\",\"Snapdeal seller violation\",\"Suo Moto Cognizance\",\"Toys (Quality Control) Order\",\"Unfair trade practice proceedings\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Tribunals\\\/Commissions\\\/Regulatory Bodies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/\",\"name\":\"CCPA Acts Against Snapdeal for Sale of Non-BIS-Certified Toys | Consumer Protection\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"CCPA action against Snapdeal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/24\\\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCPA Acts Against Snapdeal for Sale of Non-BIS-Certified Toys | Consumer Protection","description":"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act","og_description":"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"<p style=\"font-family: ED Garamond;\">Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act<\/p>","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act","datePublished":"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/"},"wordCount":667,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp","keywords":["2020","BIS non-compliance case","Central Consumer Protection Authority","Consumer protection enforcement action","Mr Anupam Mishra","Ms Nidhi Khare","Sale of non-certified toys","Snapdeal seller violation","Suo Moto Cognizance","Toys (Quality Control) Order","Unfair trade practice proceedings"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/","name":"CCPA Acts Against Snapdeal for Sale of Non-BIS-Certified Toys | Consumer Protection","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-24T11:30:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The CCPA took suo motu cognizance against Snapdeal for selling non-BIS-certified toys in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, holding it an unfair trade practice endangering child safety.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"CCPA action against Snapdeal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/24\/ccpa-action-snapdeal-non-bis-certified-toys\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sale of Non-BIS Certified Toys on Snapdeal an Unfair Trade Practice; CCPA Penalises Stallion Trading Company under Consumer Protection Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/CCPA-action-against-Snapdeal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=388425"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388425\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":388432,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/388425\/revisions\/388432"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/388428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=388425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=388425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=388425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}