{"id":387513,"date":"2026-06-18T11:00:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T05:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=387513"},"modified":"2026-06-18T10:51:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T05:21:41","slug":"bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 14.0pt;\">MP High Court:<\/span> <span style=\"\">In a writ petition filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, where multiple writ petitions and appeals were decided through a common order due to common issues raised and similar reliefs sought, a <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Division Bench<\/span> of<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Vijay Kumar Shukla<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">*<\/span><\/span> and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Alok Awasthi, JJ.<\/span>, declared the &#8220;disputed area&#8221; of Bhojshala complex to be a &#8220;protected monument&#8221; under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958<\/a> and the disputed site was held to be Bhojshala Temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and centre of Sanskrit learning, associated with Raja Bhoj of Paramar dynasty. The Court quashed the impugned order passed by Archaeological Survey of India in 2003, restricting right of Hindus to worship within Bhojshala Temple and permitting namaz by Muslim community. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that:<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;Government has the constitutional obligation to ensure preservation and protection of not only the ancient monuments and structures including temples of archaeological and historical importance, but also of sanctum sanctorum as well as the deity of spiritual importance. There is a constitutional duty even to sanction funds for providing basic amenities to pilgrims, proper arrangements for shelter places, maintenance of law and order and the preservation of purity and pristine character of the deity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The writ petitions filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and a writ appeal filed under Section 2(1), Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, raised common issues related to the claim of prayer by Hindus\/namaz by Muslims\/prayer by Jain samaj in &#8220;disputed area&#8221; of Bhojshala and Kamal Maula Mosque situated at Dhar. A challenge was made to the order dated 7 April 2003 passed by Archaeological Survey of India to the extent restricting the right of Hindus to worship in Bhojshala Complex on a particular day and timing and the order permitting the Muslim community to offer namaz on Friday. Different reliefs were claimed in relation to the same disputed area.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The impugned order, passed by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), in exercise of the powers under Rule 4, Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959, and partially notifying order dated 5 February 1998 making provisions for the entry into the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque at Dhar, allowed the Muslim community to access the premises for Friday namaz between 1.00 to 3.00 p.m. and Hindus were permitted to hold traditional ceremonies on the occasion of Basant Panchami every year, access on every Tuesday from sunrise to sunset and the visitor could take a flower or 2 and a few granules of rice. Hence the order was challenged in the petitions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, several writ petitions and appeals were disposed of by this common order.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Apart from the preliminary issues, the primary issue on merits dealt with by the Court was &#8212;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the disputed area is a &#8220;protected monument&#8221; and what was its character as on 15th day of August 1947?<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Pursuant to dealing with the preliminary issues in the matter, which were the objections raised by the respondents, the Court adjudicated the matter on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was the observation of the Court that the provisions of Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951, create a deeming fiction, giving retrospective effect, treating such monuments as protected under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840982\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904<\/a> and the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, continues this protection vesting control and management with ASI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Legislative History<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">and its Discussion<\/span> &#8212;<\/span> The Court reviewed the dispute&#8217;s legal history, considering all petitions, appeals, and related proceedings filed in connection with the matter since 1962. Further, the Court examined the legislative and administrative history of the disputed area, including the various notifications issued by ASI from time to time, notification issued under <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840982\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904<\/a><\/span>, declaring the site as <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;protected monument&#8221;<\/span>, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951<\/span> and the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that all these Acts were passed for preservation and protection of ancient monuments and objects of archaeological, historical and artistic interest. Several provisions were considered by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court went on to examine the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958<\/a> (1958 Act) such as Sections 16, 21 and 39 and stated that there can be no iota of doubt that statutory duty of ASI exists to ascertain the nature, character and original form of the place of worship. The ASI did not discharge this statutory duty and notified the property as Bhojshala or Kamal Maula Mosque.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Historical Literature and Archaeological Features<\/span> &#8212;<\/span> A fresh survey was conducted by ASI after the application being filed in 2024. The ASI report and the videography conducted by them during the survey was also examined. Moreover, the Court considered and examined the historical literature and archaeological features produced by the parties along with historical references, published journals, inscriptions, etc. and held that the disputed property is a Hindu temple and place of learning of Sanskrit language.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that ASI relied on Sanskrit inscriptions, sculptural elements and temple style pillars and slabs for their report which indicate that materials from a pre-existing Hindu structure were used. The report established Dhar as the capital of Hindu rulers (Parmars) and that later Islamic rulers constructed mosques using materials from earlier Hindu temples, including the disputed site. The Court addressed the provisions of Acts and how the disputed site came to be protected under the 1958 Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Protected Monument &#8212;<\/span> On the point of reliance on the 1935 Notification to determine the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">religious character of the site<\/span>, the Court held that the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000313498\" target=\"_blank\">Government of India Act, 1935<\/a> regarding federation and authority were not fully operational in relation to Princely States like Dhar, thus the reliance was legally questionable. And since <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Section 4, Places of Worship Act, 1991<\/span>, excludes the monuments governed by 1958, therefore,<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> the Places of Worship Act, 1991 is not applicable to this monument and cannot be used to claim fixed religious status<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that no material was placed before them regarding any survey by ASI treating the disputed site to be Bhojshala and Kamal Maula Mosque, thus, the Court held that by virtue of Section 39(2), 1958 Act, the disputed area was a <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;protected monument&#8221;<\/span> since 1904 as the property was being managed by ASI under the Acts of 1951 and 1958.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The Statutory duty of ASI exists under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543026\" target=\"_blank\">16<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958<\/a> to ascertain the nature, true character and original form of the place of worship, followed by exercise of excavation under Section 21, 1958 Act, if the Archaeological Officer has reason to believe that the area contains ruins or relics of historical or archaeological importance.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Ruling on Merit &#8212;<\/span> Pursuant to examining the report on multidisciplinary scientific survey conducted by ASI, ASI notifications, archaeological and historical facts and the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ayodhya case<\/span>, the Court held that the earlier structure was a center of learning and religious activity associated with Saraswati worship (Sharda Sadan), which was modified, damaged and reused, leading to destruction of idols and its conversion into a Mosque. And the present structure was built over a pre-existing temple of the Paramar period. The historical literature placed establishes that the character of the disputed area was Bhojshala as a centre of Sanskrit learning, associated with Raja Bhoj of Paramar dynasty. The literature and architectural references, connected with the period of Raja Bhoj, indicate the existence of temple dedicated to the Goddess Saraswati at Dhar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hindu Front for Justice<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9003482563\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine MP 11410<\/a>, decided on 15-5-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored By: Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioners:<\/span> Vishnu Shankar Jain, Vinay Joshi, Varsha Parashar, Harishankar Jain, Parth Yadav, Saurabh Singh, Mani Munjal Yadav, Utkarsh Dubey, Devendra Nagar, Vagish Parashar, Rohit Shukla, Shalini Joshi, Shivangee Parmar, Satyanarayan Dubey, Priyanka Sharma, Bhuvnesh Gupta, Lalit Namdev, Pradhumna Malpani, Arpit Singh Parihar, Rajesh Joshi, Pooja Verma<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> Salman Khurshid, Noor Ahmed Sheikh, Zishan Khan, Lubna Naaz, Azra Rehman, Tausif Warsi, Arshad Mansuri, Shobha Menon, Mohd. Ikram Ansari, Rahul Choubey, Sunil Kumar Jain, Aviral Vikas Khare, Rishi Bhargava, Ayushi Agrawal, Nandini Sharma, Kushagra Jain, Bhoomika Mev, Jyoti Sencha, Sachin Patel, Ayush Agrawal, Vishwajit Joshi, Ms. Nena Mishra, Shreesh Dubey, Surbhi Bahal, Syed Ashhar Ali Warsi, Poorvi Asati, Manan Sharma, Mohd. Hashim, Priyal Agrawal, Prashant Singh, Nilesh Yadav, Rahul Sethi, Dhirendra S. Parmar, Ashish Yadav, Sonal Gupta, Sudeep Bhargava, Shrey Raj Saxena, Swapnil Ganguly, Abhijeet Awasthy, Surendra Kumar Gupta, Viraj Godha, Sahil Sonkusale, Viraj S. Jha<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The religious character of the &#8220;disputed area&#8221; of Bhojshala Complex and Kamal Maula Mosque was held to be a Temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) in the light of provisions of Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":387514,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[107419,107356,107388,71762,107384,107385,32521,107389,107425,107391,107413,56578,107386,107428,107430,12141,85624,96763,107426,107427,107371,107382,107403,107365,61227,107357,67058,56581,107387,8131,107408,107409,107369,107422,33247,62886,107412,107363,107373,107362,34313,72699,107406,54197,107376,107414,107375,107378,107417,107416,107402,107420,107366,107401,107395,49434,107390,107392,107429,107415,107393,67301,107361,107411,67309,107367,14781,107404,107359,53967,42114,83272,38169,107379,107400,75780,107381,107360,107399,107380,51652,107374,36960,59627,2832,107358,107405,45509,107410,107407,5353,42874,107368,107397,107396,107418,107383,107370,107394,107372,107398,107364,38066,107423,42561,102861,64535,54044,107421,42827,107377,107424],"class_list":["post-387513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ailan","tag-alok-awasthi","tag-ancient-and-historical-monuments-and-archaeological-sites-and-remains-declaration-of-national-importance-act-1951","tag-ancient-monuments","tag-ancient-monuments-and-archaeological-sites-and-remains-act-1958","tag-ancient-monuments-preservation-act-1904","tag-antecedents","tag-archaeological-artefacts","tag-archaeological-evidence","tag-archaeological-features","tag-archaeological-material","tag-archaeological-survey-of-india","tag-archeological-sites-and-remains-rules-1959","tag-article-13-constitution","tag-article-130-constitution","tag-article-226","tag-article-25-constitution","tag-article-26-constitution","tag-article-365-constitution","tag-article-372-constitution","tag-ashwini-kumar-upadhyaya-case","tag-asi-survey-report","tag-ayodhya-judgment","tag-basant-panchami","tag-belief","tag-bhojshala-complex","tag-bhojshala-temple","tag-carbon-dating","tag-character-of-religious-place","tag-civil-suit","tag-conduct-of-worshipper","tag-consistence-of-religious-belief","tag-constructive","tag-dating-methods","tag-deity","tag-delay-and-latches","tag-destruction-of-idol","tag-dhar","tag-disclosing-public-standing","tag-disputed-area","tag-documentary-evidence","tag-endowment","tag-evidence-of-faith","tag-excavation","tag-for-any-other-purpose","tag-forceful-demolition","tag-fundamental-right-to-worship","tag-gazetteers","tag-goddess-saraswati","tag-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati","tag-government-of-india-cat-1935-notification","tag-hazrat-maulana-kamaluddin-chishti","tag-hindu-front-for-justice","tag-hindu-rulers","tag-hindu-temple","tag-historians","tag-historical-literature","tag-historical-references","tag-inconsistent-with-fundamental-rights","tag-indian-archaeological-review-1972","tag-inscriptions","tag-j","tag-jain-samaj","tag-juristic-personality","tag-kamal-maula-mosque","tag-kuldeep-tiwari","tag-locus-standi","tag-m-siddiq-v-suresh-das","tag-m-p-uchcha-nyayalaya-khand-nyaypeeth-ko-appeal-adhiniyam-2005","tag-mp-high-court","tag-muslims","tag-namaz","tag-oral-evidence","tag-orders-by-erstwhile-rulers","tag-parmar-dynasty","tag-places-of-worship-act-1991","tag-post-independence-law","tag-prayer-by-hindus","tag-pre-existing-hindu-structure","tag-pre-independence-legislation","tag-preponderance-of-probability","tag-professional-status","tag-proprietary-rights","tag-protected-monument","tag-public_interest_litigation","tag-raja-bhoj","tag-ram-janmabhoomi-temple","tag-religious-character","tag-religious-charitable-institution","tag-religious-use","tag-res-judicata","tag-right-to-worship","tag-salek-chand-jain","tag-sanskrit-inscriptions","tag-sanskrit-language","tag-saraswati-worship","tag-section-16-ancient-monuments-and-archaeological-sites-and-remains-act-1958","tag-section-4-places-of-worship-act-1991","tag-statues","tag-sub-judice-matter","tag-temple-style-pillars","tag-the-ancient-monument-and-archaeological-sites-and-remains-rules-1959","tag-title-of-property","tag-typological-stylistic-analysis","tag-videography","tag-vijay-kumar-shukla","tag-waqf-act","tag-waqf-property","tag-waqif","tag-worship","tag-writers","tag-xrf-spot-analysis"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MP HC Holds Bhojshala Complex Is Temple of Goddess Vagdevi, a Protected Monument | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a &quot;protected monument&quot; under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC Examines Bhojshala\u2019s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A \u201cProtected Monument\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a &quot;protected monument&quot; under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1425,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"ailan\",\"Alok Awasthi\",\"Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act 1951\",\"Ancient Monuments\",\"Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958\",\"Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1904\",\"Antecedents\",\"archaeological artefacts\",\"archaeological evidence\",\"archaeological features\",\"archaeological material\",\"Archaeological Survey of India\",\"Archeological Sites and Remains Rules 1959\",\"Article 13 Constitution\",\"Article 130 Constitution\",\"Article 226\",\"Article 25 Constitution\",\"Article 26 Constitution\",\"Article 365 Constitution\",\"Article 372 Constitution\",\"Ashwini Kumar Upadhyaya case\",\"ASI survey report\",\"Ayodhya judgment\",\"basant Panchami\",\"belief\",\"Bhojshala complex\",\"Bhojshala Temple\",\"Carbon Dating\",\"Character of religious place\",\"civil suit\",\"conduct of worshipper\",\"consistence of religious belief\",\"constructive\",\"dating methods\",\"Deity\",\"delay and latches\",\"destruction of idol\",\"dhar\",\"disclosing public standing\",\"disputed area\",\"Documentary Evidence\",\"endowment\",\"evidence of faith\",\"excavation\",\"for any other purpose\",\"forceful demolition\",\"fundamental right to worship\",\"gazetteers\",\"Goddess Saraswati\",\"Goddess vagdevi saraswati\",\"Government of India Cat 1935 notification\",\"Hazrat Maulana Kamaluddin Chishti\",\"Hindu Front for Justice\",\"Hindu rulers\",\"Hindu Temple\",\"Historians\",\"historical literature\",\"historical references\",\"inconsistent with fundamental rights\",\"Indian Archaeological Review 1972\",\"inscriptions\",\"J.\",\"Jain samaj\",\"juristic personality\",\"Kamal Maula Mosque\",\"Kuldeep Tiwari\",\"Locus Standi\",\"M Siddiq v. Suresh Das\",\"M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam 2005\",\"MP High Court\",\"Muslims\",\"Namaz\",\"Oral Evidence\",\"orders by erstwhile rulers\",\"Parmar dynasty\",\"Places of Worship Act 1991\",\"post-independence law\",\"prayer by hindus\",\"pre-existing hindu structure\",\"pre-independence legislation\",\"Preponderance of probability\",\"professional status\",\"Proprietary Rights\",\"protected monument\",\"public interest litigation\",\"Raja Bhoj\",\"Ram Janmabhoomi Temple\",\"Religious Character\",\"religious charitable institution\",\"religious use\",\"res judicata\",\"right to worship\",\"Salek Chand Jain\",\"Sanskrit inscriptions\",\"Sanskrit language\",\"Saraswati worship\",\"Section 16 Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958\",\"Section 4 Places of worship Act 1991\",\"statues\",\"sub judice matter\",\"temple style pillars\",\"The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules 1959\",\"Title of Property\",\"typological stylistic analysis\",\"videography\",\"Vijay Kumar Shukla\",\"Waqf Act\",\"Waqf property\",\"waqif\",\"Worship\",\"writers\",\"XRF spot analysis\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC Holds Bhojshala Complex Is Temple of Goddess Vagdevi, a Protected Monument | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a \\\"protected monument\\\" under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Bhojshala complex temple goddess Vagdevi protected monument\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC Holds Bhojshala Complex Is Temple of Goddess Vagdevi, a Protected Monument | SCC Times","description":"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a \"protected monument\" under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC Examines Bhojshala\u2019s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A \u201cProtected Monument\u201d","og_description":"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a \"protected monument\" under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;","datePublished":"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/"},"wordCount":1425,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp","keywords":["ailan","Alok Awasthi","Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act 1951","Ancient Monuments","Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958","Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1904","Antecedents","archaeological artefacts","archaeological evidence","archaeological features","archaeological material","Archaeological Survey of India","Archeological Sites and Remains Rules 1959","Article 13 Constitution","Article 130 Constitution","Article 226","Article 25 Constitution","Article 26 Constitution","Article 365 Constitution","Article 372 Constitution","Ashwini Kumar Upadhyaya case","ASI survey report","Ayodhya judgment","basant Panchami","belief","Bhojshala complex","Bhojshala Temple","Carbon Dating","Character of religious place","civil suit","conduct of worshipper","consistence of religious belief","constructive","dating methods","Deity","delay and latches","destruction of idol","dhar","disclosing public standing","disputed area","Documentary Evidence","endowment","evidence of faith","excavation","for any other purpose","forceful demolition","fundamental right to worship","gazetteers","Goddess Saraswati","Goddess vagdevi saraswati","Government of India Cat 1935 notification","Hazrat Maulana Kamaluddin Chishti","Hindu Front for Justice","Hindu rulers","Hindu Temple","Historians","historical literature","historical references","inconsistent with fundamental rights","Indian Archaeological Review 1972","inscriptions","J.","Jain samaj","juristic personality","Kamal Maula Mosque","Kuldeep Tiwari","Locus Standi","M Siddiq v. Suresh Das","M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam 2005","MP High Court","Muslims","Namaz","Oral Evidence","orders by erstwhile rulers","Parmar dynasty","Places of Worship Act 1991","post-independence law","prayer by hindus","pre-existing hindu structure","pre-independence legislation","Preponderance of probability","professional status","Proprietary Rights","protected monument","public interest litigation","Raja Bhoj","Ram Janmabhoomi Temple","Religious Character","religious charitable institution","religious use","res judicata","right to worship","Salek Chand Jain","Sanskrit inscriptions","Sanskrit language","Saraswati worship","Section 16 Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958","Section 4 Places of worship Act 1991","statues","sub judice matter","temple style pillars","The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules 1959","Title of Property","typological stylistic analysis","videography","Vijay Kumar Shukla","Waqf Act","Waqf property","waqif","Worship","writers","XRF spot analysis"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/","name":"MP HC Holds Bhojshala Complex Is Temple of Goddess Vagdevi, a Protected Monument | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-18T05:30:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The MP High Court has held that the Bhojshala Complex is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and a \"protected monument\" under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Bhojshala complex temple goddess Vagdevi protected monument"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/bhojshala-complex-a-temple-of-goddess-vagdevi-saraswati-protected-monument-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC Examines Bhojshala&#8217;s Religious Character As On 15 August 1947 To Be A Temple Of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati); Holds It A &#8220;Protected Monument&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Bhojshala-complex-temple-goddess-Vagdevi-protected-monument.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=387513"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387517,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387513\/revisions\/387517"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/387514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=387513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=387513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=387513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}