{"id":387463,"date":"2026-06-18T09:00:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T03:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=387463"},"modified":"2026-06-17T18:57:48","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T13:27:48","slug":"pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/","title":{"rendered":"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a batch of writ petitions concerning denial and inadequate medical reimbursement to State employees and pensioners, involving issues such as treatment in non-empanelled hospitals, reimbursement restricted to Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh (PGI) rates, and outdated policy conditions, the Single Judge Bench of Sandeep Moudgil, J., held that medical reimbursement policies, being instruments of social welfare and an extension of the right to health under Article 21 must be interpreted in a humane and purposive manner and not in a way that defeats genuine claims on technical grounds. Noting that the State was revisiting the policy framework, the Court directed the Competent Committee to reconsider each petitioner&#8217;s claim independently and pass a reasoned decision within 4 weeks, with any amount found payable carrying interest at 6 per cent per annum.<\/p>\n<p>The Court observed that,<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In such circumstances, to reject reimbursement solely on the ground of non-empanelment would amount to placing policy procedure above human survival.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners challenged various aspects of the State&#8217;s medical reimbursement policy, including denial of reimbursement for treatment obtained from non-empanelled private hospitals, restriction of reimbursement to PGI rates despite policy provisions permitting higher reimbursement in certain cases, the condition disentitling dependants earning more than Rs 3500 per month from medical benefits, and the continued application of outdated package rates and treatment modules despite rising healthcare costs and advancements in medical science.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/02\/disability-pension-army-personnel-medical-opinion-kerala-high-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Disability Pension to Army Personnel Cannot be Denied on Medical Opinion Unsupported by Adequate Reasons: Kerala High Court<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the very threshold the Court observed that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the right to health and medical care is firmly recognised as an integral facet of the right to life guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a><\/span> as recognised in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Punjab<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohinder Singh Chawla<\/span>, (1997) 1 SCT 716. The Court noted that<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Public health and hospitals&#8221;<\/span> being a State subject in the State List <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575380\" target=\"_blank\">(Entry 6, List II) under VII<\/a> Schedule of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, the State bears the paramount obligation of safeguarding the<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">health and well-being of its citizens and more particularly those who have spent the prime years of their lives serving the State machinery itself, as a welfare entity governed by constitutional morality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that medical reimbursement policies are intended to give effect to the constitutional promise of dignity and social security and to ensure that employees are not reduced to financial distress due to illness. The Court noted that while the State&#8217;s reimbursement framework is largely based on PGI rates, constitutional adjudication cannot proceed divorced from live realities, particularly in medical emergencies where factors such as overcrowding, long waiting periods, lack of beds, and urgency of treatment often compel patients to seek care at the nearest available hospital. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;In such circumstances, to reject reimbursement solely on the ground of non-empanelment would amount to placing policy procedure above human survival.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that medical reimbursement policies must be interpreted through a humane and welfare-oriented lens, consistent with the country&#8217;s foundational values, and should be applied in a manner that furthers human welfare rather than allowing genuine claims to be defeated on technical grounds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The constitutional promise of a welfare state draws strength from the enduring civilisational ethos of this country, encapsulated in the ancient Sanskrit principle of &#8220;\u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947 \u092d\u0935\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0941 \u0938\u0941\u0916\u093f\u0928\u0903, \u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947 \u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0941 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092f\u093e\u0903&#8221;&#8212; may all be happy; may all be free from illness.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the health and dignity of individuals are integral to societal well-being and form a core principle of governance. Medical reimbursement schemes, being social welfare measures, should be interpreted in a humane and purposive manner consistent with the constitutional vision of a just and caring society.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/25\/ncdrc-wrong-kidney-removal-medical-negligence-2-crore-compensation\/\" target=\"_blank\">NCDRC Holds Surgeon Liable for Gross Medical Negligence in Wrongful Removal of Healthy Kidney, Awards &#8377;2 Crore<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disposing all the writ petitions, the Court directed the respondents to consider each petitioner&#8217;s claim independently and sympathetically in light of the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shiva Kant Jha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9Oo52rTc\" target=\"_blank\">(2018) 16 SCC 187<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.P. Ojha<\/span>, (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/60ZbW8ln\" target=\"_blank\">1998) 2 SCC 554<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rama Kant Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, CWP-257-2019 amongst others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting the State&#8217;s submission that a committee comprising the Additional Director Health Services, the Deputy Director (Medical Reimbursement Branch), and the Nodal Officer (Empanelled Hospitals) had been constituted, the Court directed the Committee to examine each case individually and pass a conscious and well-reasoned decision within 4 weeks from receipt of the certified copy of the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that any amount found payable to the petitioners upon reconsideration of their claims shall carry interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date it became due till its actual realisation. Accordingly, the batch of writ petitions and all pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Swati Yadav<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Nx7J19wl\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 13335<\/a>, decided on 29-5-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate, Viren Nehra, Ms. Poorvi Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Chaman Deep, Ivneet Singh Pabla, P.R. Yadav, Vikas Singh Chawra, Parvinder Moar, Tejas Ahlawat, P.K. Chugh, Suryaveer Singh Surjewala, Diwan S. Adlakha, Saurav Verma, Anshul Pareek, Deepak Sonak, Riya Kangra, Sandeep Thakan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For State:<\/span> Deepak Balyan<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In medical emergencies where overcrowding, waiting periods and urgency compel patients to the nearest hospital regardless of empanelment status, a blanket rejection on procedural grounds violates the constitutional promise under Article 21, the Court directed independent reconsideration of each claim within four weeks with 6% interest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":387471,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13681,107347,29878,31437,107346,29876,3518,6071,29194,67313,66065,15891],"class_list":["post-387463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21","tag-healthcare-benefits","tag-medical-claims","tag-medical-reimbursement","tag-non-empanelled-hospitals","tag-pensioners","tag-public_health","tag-punjab-haryana-high-court","tag-right-to-health","tag-social-welfare-schemes","tag-state-employees","tag-welfare-state"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Medical Reimbursement Cannot Be Denied for Non-Empanelment: P&amp;H HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees&#039; claims\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees&#039; claims\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":925,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 21\",\"Healthcare Benefits\",\"Medical Claims\",\"Medical Reimbursement\",\"Non-empanelled hospitals\",\"Pensioners\",\"public health\",\"Punjab &amp;Haryana High Court\",\"Right to health\",\"social welfare schemes\",\"State employees\",\"Welfare state\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/\",\"name\":\"Medical Reimbursement Cannot Be Denied for Non-Empanelment: P&H HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees' claims\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/18\\\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Medical Reimbursement Cannot Be Denied for Non-Empanelment: P&H HC | SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees' claims","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab & Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees' claims","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims","datePublished":"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/"},"wordCount":925,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp","keywords":["Article 21","Healthcare Benefits","Medical Claims","Medical Reimbursement","Non-empanelled hospitals","Pensioners","public health","Punjab &amp;Haryana High Court","Right to health","social welfare schemes","State employees","Welfare state"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/","name":"Medical Reimbursement Cannot Be Denied for Non-Empanelment: P&H HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-18T03:30:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals cannot be denied due to procedural requirements and directed reconsideration of employees' claims","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Medical reimbursement for non-empanelled hospitals"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/18\/pnh-hc-medical-reimbursement-non-empanelled-hospitals-article-21-state-employees\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rejecting Reimbursement Solely Due to Non-Empanelment, Places Procedure Above Human Survival: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC Calls for Reconsideration of Medical Reimbursement Claims"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Medical-reimbursement-for-non-empanelled-hospitals.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=387463"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387473,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387463\/revisions\/387473"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/387471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=387463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=387463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=387463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}