{"id":386766,"date":"2026-06-10T17:30:24","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T12:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=386766"},"modified":"2026-06-10T17:46:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T12:16:41","slug":"makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by MakeMyTrip (India) (P) Ltd. seeking protection of its registered trade mark &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221; against the use of the allegedly infringing marks &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221; and its logo in relation to identical travel and tourism services, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jyoti Singh, J.<\/span>, granted an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the impugned marks, trade name, logo and domain name &#8220;www.makemyindiatrip.com&#8221;, or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s well-known &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221;\/<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"65\"\/> trade marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case of trade mark infringement and passing off, that the balance of convenience lay in its favour, and that continued use of the impugned marks was likely to cause consumer confusion, dilute the plaintiff&#8217;s goodwill and reputation, and result in irreparable harm to its business interests.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff instituted a suit seeking permanent injunction against infringement of its registered trade mark &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221;, passing off, dilution and allied reliefs. The plaintiff asserted that it is one of India&#8217;s leading online travel companies and has been continuously using the coined and distinctive mark &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221;\/ <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"65\" \/> since 2000 in relation to a wide range of travel and tourism services, including flight, hotel, rail and bus bookings, holiday packages, visa assistance and travel-related services. It was contended that over more than 2 decades, the plaintiff had acquired extensive goodwill and reputation through substantial business operations, worldwide trade mark registrations, extensive advertising campaigns, strategic collaborations, celebrity endorsements, sponsorships and a significant online and social media presence. The plaintiff claimed statutory as well as common law rights in the &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221; marks and logos <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"521\" height=\"69\"\/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"604\" height=\"64\"\/>, which have become exclusively associated with its business. In March 2026, the plaintiff discovered that the defendant was using the marks &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221; and its logo, along with the domain name &#8220;www.makemyindiatrip.com&#8221;, for identical travel and tourism services. According to the plaintiff, the impugned marks were visually, structurally and conceptually similar to its registered marks, and the mere addition of the word &#8220;India&#8221; did not distinguish them. It was alleged that the defendant had adopted the impugned marks, trade name, website and social media presence in a manner calculated to ride upon the plaintiff&#8217;s goodwill, create an impression of association with the plaintiff and cause confusion among consumers, thereby constituting infringement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563671\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> and passing off.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for grant of an ex parte ad interim injunction, with the balance of convenience lying in its favour and a likelihood of irreparable harm if protection was denied. The Court noted that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the trade mark &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221; and found the impugned marks &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221; and its logo <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-5.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"153\" height=\"42\"\/> to be deceptively similar. It held that the addition of the word &#8220;India&#8221; was insufficient to distinguish the rival marks, particularly when the parties were providing identical travel-related services to a common consumer base. The Court further observed that confusion among consumers, including initial interest confusion, point-of-sale confusion and post-sale confusion, could not be ruled out in view of the plaintiff&#8217;s extensive goodwill and reputation. Prima facie, the defendant&#8217;s adoption of the impugned marks appeared to be in bad faith and intended to create a false affiliation or nexus with the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Holding that the continued use of the impugned marks would dilute and erode the plaintiff&#8217;s goodwill and constituted infringement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563671\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>, the Court restrained the defendant, till the next date of hearing, from using the marks &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221;\/ <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/17-30_MMT-6.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"153\" height=\"42\"\/> and its logo, the trade name &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221;, the domain name <a href=\"http:\/\/www.makemyindiatrip.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">www.makemyindiatrip.com<\/a>, and any other mark deceptively similar to &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221;. The plaintiff was directed to comply with the requirements of Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523439\" target=\"_blank\">39 Rule 3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) within 2 weeks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #ee0000;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/19\/australia-hc-verdict-in-katy-perry-trade-mark-dispute\/\" target=\"_blank\">Australia HC ruling in Katy Perry trade mark dispute| SCC Times<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #ee0000;\">Also Read:<\/span><\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/13\/delhi-hc-toyotas-alphard-declared-well-known-trade-mark\/\" target=\"_blank\">Toyota&#8217;s &#8220;ALPHARD&#8221; declared well-known trade mark | SCC Times<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">MakeMyTrip (India) (P) Ltd<\/span>. v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">MakeMyIndiaTrip<\/span>, CS(COMM) 650 of 2026, decided on 29-5-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Mohit Goel, Siddhant Goel, Deepankar Mishra and Soumya Khandelwal, Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Delhi High Court restrained the use of &#8220;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#8221;, holding that the addition of the word &#8220;India&#8221; did not sufficiently distinguish the mark from &#8220;MakeMyTrip&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67541,"featured_media":386783,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[106780,2543,25414,71166,39770,106779,27404,3221,106781],"class_list":["post-386766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deceptively-similar-marks","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-interim-relief","tag-justice-jyoti-singh","tag-makemytrip","tag-o-39-r-3-cpc","tag-passing-off-action","tag-Trademark","tag-trademark-infringement-under-s-29-trade-marks-act-1999"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains use of &#039;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#039;; addition of &#039;India&#039; insufficient to distinguish from &#039;MakeMyTrip&#039; trademark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains use of &#039;MakeMyIndiaTrip&#039;; addition of &#039;India&#039; insufficient to distinguish from &#039;MakeMyTrip&#039; trademark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Malika Bhola\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":703,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"deceptively similar marks\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"interim relief\",\"Justice Jyoti Singh\",\"MakeMytrip\",\"O. 39 r. 3 CPC\",\"passing off action\",\"Trademark\",\"trademark infringement under S. 29 Trade Marks Act 1999\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/\",\"name\":\"MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court restrains use of 'MakeMyIndiaTrip'; addition of 'India' insufficient to distinguish from 'MakeMyTrip' trademark\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/10\\\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\",\"name\":\"Malika Bhola\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Malika Bhola\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/malika-bhola\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement case | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court restrains use of 'MakeMyIndiaTrip'; addition of 'India' insufficient to distinguish from 'MakeMyTrip' trademark","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks","og_description":"Delhi High Court restrains use of 'MakeMyIndiaTrip'; addition of 'India' insufficient to distinguish from 'MakeMyTrip' trademark","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Malika Bhola","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Malika Bhola","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/"},"author":{"name":"Malika Bhola","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1"},"headline":"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks","datePublished":"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/"},"wordCount":703,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp","keywords":["deceptively similar marks","Delhi High Court","interim relief","Justice Jyoti Singh","MakeMytrip","O. 39 r. 3 CPC","passing off action","Trademark","trademark infringement under S. 29 Trade Marks Act 1999"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/","name":"MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-10T12:00:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T12:16:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1"},"description":"Delhi High Court restrains use of 'MakeMyIndiaTrip'; addition of 'India' insufficient to distinguish from 'MakeMyTrip' trademark","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"MakeMyTrip Trademark infringement"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/10\/makemytrip-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC protects MakeMyTrip trade mark; restrains use of deceptively similar \u201cMakeMyIndiaTrip\u201d marks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1","name":"Malika Bhola","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Malika Bhola"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/malika-bhola\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/MakeMyTrip-Trademark-infringement.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67541"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=386766"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":386786,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386766\/revisions\/386786"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/386783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=386766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=386766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=386766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}