{"id":385955,"date":"2026-06-03T10:00:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T04:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=385955"},"modified":"2026-06-03T09:14:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T03:44:10","slug":"due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/","title":{"rendered":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Can an arbitral award be challenged simply because a party disagrees with how the tribunal conducted the proceedings? Or does court intervention require something more fundamental? These questions lie at the heart of the distinction between due process review and public policy review, a distinction that was explored in depth at LIDW 2026 and has increasingly shaped the approach of Indian courts to arbitral award challenges.<\/p>\n

Due process concerns the fairness of the arbitral process, namely whether parties were given a proper opportunity to present their case, respond to evidence and participate meaningfully in the proceedings. Public policy, by contrast, concerns the legitimacy of the award itself and asks whether enforcement would offend the most fundamental legal principles of the forum state. Indian arbitration law reflects a similar distinction. Due process challenges are generally raised under Section 34(2)(a)(iii)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (Arbitration and Conciliation Act), which permits a court to set aside an award where a party was not given proper notice of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present its case.<\/p>\n

Also Read: Supreme Court explains impact of undue and unexplained delay on validity of arbitral awards<\/a><\/p>\n

Courts have consistently held that this ground is directed at genuine procedural unfairness and not mere dissatisfaction with a tribunal’s case-management decisions. Judicial review is therefore not available simply because a party believes that additional evidence should have been admitted, further hearings should have been granted, or a different procedural course ought to have been followed. As several panellists observed at LIDW26, the relevant inquiry is not whether every procedural request was granted, but whether the party had a fair opportunity to be heard.<\/p>\n

Public policy challenges are treated differently. Section 34(2)(b)(ii)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act<\/a> permits a court to set aside an award if it is in conflict with the public policy of India. Over the last decade, Indian courts have progressively narrowed the scope of this ground and repeatedly emphasised that courts are not sitting in appeal over arbitral awards. The modern approach recognises that an award cannot be challenged merely because a court might have reached a different conclusion on the facts or the law. Intervention is generally confined to cases involving the fundamental policy of Indian law or the most basic notions of morality and justice.<\/p>\n

Also Read:<\/span> Can Arbitral Awards Be Modified in Setting Aside Proceedings? — A Brief on the Supreme Court’s Reinterpretation of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a><\/p>\n

In this respect, the Indian position mirrors the distinction discussed at LIDW26. Due process review protects the integrity of the arbitral procedure, while public policy review safeguards the legal system from awards that undermine its most fundamental values.<\/p>\n

Also Read:<\/span> Is Arbitration Getting Worse or Are Courts Getting More Activist? LIDW26 Panel Takes On Due Process, Public Policy and AI Risks<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The distinction drawn at LIDW26 between due process challenges and public policy review finds a close parallel in Indian arbitration jurisprudence, where courts examine procedural fairness and public policy concerns through separate legal lenses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":385956,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[97664],"tags":[105965,40741,105838,105822,67088,105967,42856,95223,30032,105966,101994,2805,105964,54422,105968,105839,65941,84117],"class_list":["post-385955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-events-collaborations","tag-arbitral-procedure","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-due-process-challenges","tag-due-process-paranoia","tag-enforcement-of-arbitral-awards","tag-fundamental-policy-of-indian-law","tag-indian-arbitration","tag-indian-arbitration-jurisprudence","tag-international-arbitration","tag-judicial-review-of-arbitral-awards","tag-lidw26","tag-natural_justice","tag-opportunity-to-present-case","tag-procedural-fairness","tag-public-policy-challenge","tag-public-policy-review","tag-scc-times","tag-section-34-arbitration-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDue Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration \u2014 Lessons from LIDW 2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"headline\":\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":493,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Arbitral Procedure\",\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996\",\"Due Process Challenges\",\"Due Process Paranoia\",\"enforcement of arbitral awards\",\"Fundamental Policy of Indian Law\",\"Indian Arbitration\",\"Indian arbitration jurisprudence\",\"International arbitration\",\"Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards\",\"LIDW26\",\"natural justice\",\"Opportunity to Present Case\",\"procedural fairness\",\"Public Policy Challenge\",\"Public Policy Review\",\"SCC Times\",\"Section 34 Arbitration Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Events & Collaborations\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/\",\"name\":\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/03\\\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/soumya\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration | SCC Times","description":"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration \u2014 Lessons from LIDW 2026","og_description":"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/"},"author":{"name":"Soumya Yadav","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"headline":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026","datePublished":"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/"},"wordCount":493,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp","keywords":["Arbitral Procedure","Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996","Due Process Challenges","Due Process Paranoia","enforcement of arbitral awards","Fundamental Policy of Indian Law","Indian Arbitration","Indian arbitration jurisprudence","International arbitration","Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards","LIDW26","natural justice","Opportunity to Present Case","procedural fairness","Public Policy Challenge","Public Policy Review","SCC Times","Section 34 Arbitration Act"],"articleSection":["Events & Collaborations"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/","name":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-03T04:30:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"As discussed at LIDW26, due process review and public policy review serve distinct functions in arbitration, a distinction that has been increasingly recognised by Indian courts.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review in Indian Arbitration"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/06\/03\/due-process-challenges-and-public-policy-review-how-indian-courts-draw-the-line-in-arbitration\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Due Process Challenges and Public Policy Review: How Indian Courts Draw the Line in Arbitration — Lessons from LIDW 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Due-Process-Challenges-and-Public-Policy-Review-in-Indian-Arbitration.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=385955"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385955\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":385959,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/385955\/revisions\/385959"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/385956"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=385955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=385955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=385955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}