{"id":383075,"date":"2026-05-02T14:30:21","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T09:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=383075"},"modified":"2026-05-02T14:58:21","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T09:28:21","slug":"raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> While considering a petition filed by the petitioner challenging the award passed by the Labour Court dated 30 August 2021 and to direct the respondent-Board to regularise the petitioner and pay salary and other benefits effective from 1 April 1983, a Single Judge Bench of Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., refused to grant relief.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Also read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/23\/ker-hc-upholds-continuation-of-existing-labour-courts-and-tribunals\/\" target=\"_blank\">Kerala HC upholds Centre&#8217;s notification on continuation of existing Labour Courts and Tribunals until new Code Tribunals are constituted<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent-Board contended that the petitioner had already been granted all the benefits of regularisation from the date he was actually entitled to such regularisation, that is, from 1 April 1989. If further argued that the Labour Court answered the reference in negative because the petitioner had failed to point out any patent illegality or error in the impugned award.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Taking into account that the matter pertained to 2004 and that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and also in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the Court dismissed that petition at hand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amar Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Labour Court<\/span>, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 471 of 2003, decided on 27-4-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Vikram Choudhary, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the present case, the petitioner sought regularisation and benefits from 1 April 1983, and the Board claimed that the date from which he was entitled was 1 April 1989.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":383092,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[103512,79706,9931,2575,3439,28954,103513],"class_list":["post-383075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-award-on-regularisation","tag-justice-pushpendra-singh-bhati","tag-labour-court","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-regularisation","tag-salary","tag-salary-and-benefits"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC rejects 2004 plea challenging Labour Court&#039;s award on regularisation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court&#039;s 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court&#039;s 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"headline\":\"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":213,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/award-on-regularisation.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"award on regularisation\",\"Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati\",\"Labour Court'\",\"Rajasthan High Court\",\"regularisation\",\"salary\",\"salary and benefits\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC rejects 2004 plea challenging Labour Court's award on regularisation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/award-on-regularisation.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court's 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/award-on-regularisation.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/award-on-regularisation.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"award on regularisation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/02\\\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/shriyasingh\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC rejects 2004 plea challenging Labour Court's award on regularisation | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court's 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation","og_description":"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court's 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/"},"author":{"name":"Shriya Singh","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"headline":"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation","datePublished":"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/"},"wordCount":213,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.webp","keywords":["award on regularisation","Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati","Labour Court'","Rajasthan High Court","regularisation","salary","salary and benefits"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/","name":"Raj HC rejects 2004 plea challenging Labour Court's award on regularisation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.webp","datePublished":"2026-05-02T09:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-02T09:28:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"Rajasthan HC dismisses 23-year-old writ petition challenging Labour Court's 2001 award on regularisation, holds petitioner correctly regularised from 1 April 1989.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"award on regularisation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/05\/02\/raj-hc-rejects-2004-plea-challenging-labour-courts-award-on-regularisation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court Dismisses 23 Year-Old Plea Challenging Labour Court\u2019s Award on Regularisation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/award-on-regularisation.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/delhi-high-court-denies-regularization-request-of-a-messenger-boy-of-a-bank-for-not-being-appointed-through-a-regular-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court denies regularisation request of a messenger boy of a Bank for not being appointed through a regular process","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court upheld the order of the Labour Court wherein it was held that since the messenger boy of a Bank was unable to establish that he moved an application for absorption in the service in pursuance of the Bipartite Settlement, therefore, he was not entitled to regularisation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":213034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/ker-hc-writ-court-not-a-proper-forum-for-ventilation-of-grievance-pertaining-to-regularisation-of-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Writ Court not a proper forum for ventilation of grievance pertaining to regularisation of service","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of V. Chitambaresh and A.M. Babu, JJ. dismissed an appeal challenging the learned Single Judge\u2019s order dismissing a petition filed for regularisation of service. Appellant herein had filed a claim for regularisation in service but the same was turned down in 2001. The writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/08\/larger-bench-to-decide-if-labour-and-industrial-courts-have-power-to-order-regularisation\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":2},"title":"Larger bench to decide if Labour and Industrial Courts have power to order regularisation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has called for the reconsideration of the division bench verdict in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v Petroleum Coal Labour Union, (2015) 6 SCC 494 \u00a0[PCLU] and has, hence, referred the matter to a larger bench. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223620,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed this Writ Petition by the petitioners for restraining the respondents to terminate their services that was on a contract basis for a very long time. On 03-09-2015, the petitioner applied for a post under the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojna (\u2018DAY-NULM\u2019). The above mentioned got\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/raj-hc-no-material-change-reflected-in-the-pleadings-thus-petitioner-barred-to-contend-re-framing-of-issues\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | No material change reflected in the pleadings, thus petitioner barred to contend re framing of issues","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., dismissed the petition filed for mainly amendment of the issues framed in the pleadings at a later stage. The facts of the case were that the respondent-landlord had filed an application under Section 18(2) of the Rajasthan Rent Control\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/11\/orissa-hc-upholds-odisha-administrative-tribunals-order-to-regularise-services-of-unior-clerks-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":383075,"position":5},"title":"Orissa HC upholds Odisha Administrative Tribunal&#8217;s order to regularise services of Junior clerks; directs State to implement order within 6 weeks","author":"Editor","date":"May 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that there was scope for promotion to the post of Junior Clerk by virtue of the Odisha Ministerial Service (Method of Recruitment to the Posts of Junior Clerks in the District Offices) Amendment Rules, 2001.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=383075"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":383095,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383075\/revisions\/383095"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/383092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=383075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=383075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=383075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}