{"id":382854,"date":"2026-04-30T16:30:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T11:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=382854"},"modified":"2026-04-30T18:18:54","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T12:48:54","slug":"del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> The instant appeal preferred by the State under Section 378(1)(b<\/span>)<\/a>, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), challenging trial court’s judgment of acquittal dated 29 January 2015, whereby the respondent\/accused had been tried for offences under Sections 354-A<\/a> and 354-D<\/a>, Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and Section 12<\/a>, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO Act), in connection with an incident of catching hold of the minor’s hand without consent with sexual intent by the accused, a stranger. The Single Judge Bench of Chandrasekharan Sudha*, J.<\/span>, although held that a stranger grabbing minor’s hand at night held to constitute criminal force under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> but upheld the trial court’s order of acquittal. The Court reasoned its decision on following grounds:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    The ingredients for the offences charged, Sections 354-A<\/a>, 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>, were not made out.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Although the facts may disclose an offence under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a>, absence of charge and inapplicability of Section 222<\/a> CrPC<\/a> prevented conviction.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Also Read: Rubbing penis against child’s private part not “Penetrative Sexual Assault” under POCSO Act; Delhi HC modifies sentence<\/a><\/p>\n

    Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n

    The prosecution case is that on 20 March 2013 at about 10.00 p.m., PW 2, a minor aged about 17 years, was returning from a common bathroom to her room situated on the fourth floor of a building in Naraina Village.<\/p>\n

    At that time, the accused, a stranger, came from behind and caught hold of her hand. PW 2 managed to free herself, ran into her room, bolted the door from inside, and raised alarm. The accused followed her, banged on the door, and shouted abuses. Upon hearing the commotion, other residents gathered, apprehended the accused, and informed the police.<\/p>\n

    The police reached the spot, recorded her statement, and arrested the accused. An FIR was registered at Naraina Police Station on the basis of the complaint of PW 2. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed. The trial court framed charges under Sections 354-A<\/a> and 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.<\/p>\n

    The Additional Sessions Judge, by order dated 29 January 2015, acquitted the accused acquitted of offences under Sections 354-A<\/a>, 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>. The State preferred the present appeal under Section 378(1)(b<\/span>)<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, challenging the impugned order of acquittal.<\/p>\n

    Also Read: Making minor touch private parts with sexual intent constitutes Aggravated Sexual Assault under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court<\/a><\/p>\n

    Issues for Determination<\/h3>\n

    Whether the impugned order of acquittal suffers from any infirmity warranting interference by the appellate court?<\/p>\n

    Analysis<\/h3>\n

    Scope of Appellate Interference<\/p>\n

    At the outset, the Court observed that under Section 386<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, the appellate court possesses full power to review, reappreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which the order of acquittal is founded. CrPC<\/a> does not impose any limitation or restriction on the exercise of such power, and the appellate court may reach its own conclusion both on questions of fact and law. At the same time, the Court emphasised that expressions such as “substantial and compelling reasons”, “strong circumstances” or “glaring mistakes” are not intended to curtail this power but merely underscore the reluctance of an appellate court to interfere with an acquittal. However, it was further underscored that in cases of acquittal, a double presumption of innocence operates in favour of the accused: (i<\/span>) the presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence; and (ii<\/span>) such presumption stands reinforced by the acquittal recorded by the trial court. Consequently, if two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the evidence on record, the appellate court ought not to disturb the finding of acquittal. [See Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar<\/span> v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2024) 8 SCC 149<\/a>; Rajesh Prasad<\/span> v. State of Bihar<\/span>, (2022) 3 SCC 471<\/a>; and Chandrappa<\/span> v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2007) 4 SCC 415<\/a>].<\/p>\n

    Relying on Ram Kumar<\/span> v. State of Haryana<\/span>, 1995 Supp (1) SCC 248<\/a>, the Court noted that due weight must be given to the trial court’s advantage of observing the demeanour of witnesses. It reiterated the settle principle of law that “if the main grounds on which the court below has based its order acquitting the accused, are reasonable and plausible, and the same cannot entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished, the High Court should not disturb the order of acquittal”.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Determination of Charges<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that although the charge-sheet alleged offences under Sections 354<\/a>, 354-A<\/a>, 354-D<\/a> and 509<\/a> IPC<\/a> along with Section 10<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>, the trial court had framed charges only under Sections 354-A<\/a>, 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>. Therefore, the enquiry was confined to whether the evidence on record established the ingredients of these specific offences.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that Section 354-A<\/a> IPC<\/a> contemplates sexual harassment and requires the presence of unwelcome and explicit sexual conduct coupled with sexual intent with fulfilling following essential ingredients:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. \n

      the victim must be a woman;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    2. \n

      there must be unwelcome and explicit sexual conduct; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    3. \n

      conduct may include physical contact and advances involving sexual intent, a demand or request for sexual favours, showing pornography against her will, or making sexually coloured remarks.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Section 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> deals with stalking and the essential ingredients are:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. \n

        the accused must follow or contact a woman repeatedly;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      2. \n

        such contact must be despite a clear indication of disinterest by the woman; or<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      3. \n

        the accused monitors her use of the internet or electronic communication.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a> prescribes punishment for sexual harassment of a child, essential ingredients are:<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. \n

          the victim must be a child below 18 years of age;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        2. \n

          the accused must engage in sexual harassment without physical contact; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        3. \n

          such conduct may include making sexual remarks, gestures, showing pornography, or repeatedly communicating with sexual intent.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Also Read: “POCSO Act is gender neutral”; Karnataka High Court refuses to quash sexual assault case against Woman<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

          Evaluation of Evidence vis-à-vis Charged Offences<\/p>\n

          Upon examining the materials on record, the Court found that the alleged overt acts of the accused did not satisfy the statutory ingredients of Section 354-A<\/a> or Section 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> or Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>. The conduct attributed to the accused, though improper, did not amount to sexual harassment in the manner contemplated under Section 354-A, nor did it constitute repeated following or stalking within the meaning of Section 354-D. Similarly, the requirements of Section 12<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>, which presuppose non-contact sexual harassment through gestures or communication, were not fulfilled.<\/p>\n

          The Court examined Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a>, statutory definitions of “force” under Section 349<\/a> IPC<\/a>, “criminal force” under Section 350<\/a> IPC<\/a>, and “assault” under Section 351<\/a> IPC<\/a>, to decide whether the proved facts would constitute an offence under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a>, which penalises assault or use of criminal force to outrage the modesty of a woman.<\/p>\n

          Applying these definitions to the facts of the case, the Court observed that the conduct of the accused, being a stranger, approaching the victim at night while she was returning from a common washroom, and catching hold of her hand without her consent, would certainly amount to use of criminal force. The reaction of the victim, who became frightened, ran into her room and bolted the door, further corroborated the nature of the act. The Court noted that such conduct, by its very nature, was “sexually coloured” and clearly indicative of an intention to outrage the modesty of the victim. The absence of any prior relationship and the suddenness of the act reinforced this inference.<\/p>\n

          The Court thus recorded a clear finding that even if the ingredients of Section 354-A<\/a> IPC<\/a> were not made out, the facts established on record would squarely constitute an offence under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

          Also Read: Commenting about dress of girls, touching them inappropriately on their back, cheek and neck constitute an offence under Section 7 of POCSO Act: HP HC refuses to quash FIR<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

          Applicability of Section 222<\/a> CrPC<\/a><\/p>\n

          The Court further considered whether the accused could be convicted under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> despite the absence of a specific charge. For this purpose, reliance was placed on Section 222<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, which permits conviction for a “minor offence” even if no charge has been framed for such offence.<\/p>\n

          The Court referred to the decision in Shamnsaheb M. Multtani v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2001) 2 SCC 577<\/a>, wherein it was held that the concept of “minor offence” is not determined merely by the lesser punishment but by the nature of the ingredients, but “only if the two offences are cognate offences, wherein the main ingredients are common, the one punishable among them with a lesser sentence can be regarded as a minor offence, vis-a-vis the other offence”.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Upon comparing Sections 354<\/a> and 354-A<\/a> IPC<\/a>, the Court found that the ingredients of the two provisions are distinct. While Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> requires use of criminal force with intent to outrage modesty, Section 354-A<\/a> IPC<\/a> pertains to specific acts of sexual harassment. Despite the punishment under certain sub-clauses of Section 354-A being lesser, the offences cannot be regarded as cognate or interchangeable. Consequently, Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> cannot be treated as a “minor offence” vis-à-vis Section 354-A<\/a> IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

          In view of this distinction, the Court held that neither Section 222(1) nor Section 222(2)<\/a> CrPC<\/a> could be invoked to convict the accused under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> in the absence of a charge.<\/p>\n

          Decision<\/h3>\n

          The Court held that although the evidence on record disclosed conduct amounting to an offence under Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a>, the legal constraints arising from the absence of a charge and the inapplicability of Section 222<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, provided no ground for interference. Therefore, the appeal sans merit is dismissed and the acquittal was upheld. <\/p>\n

          Also Read: Delhi High Court sets aside charge under Section 21 POCSO Act against mother for delay in reporting sexual assault of her child by father<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

          [State<\/span> v. Nitu Singh<\/span>, CRL.A. 265\/2018, decided on 28-4-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

          *Judgment by Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

          Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

          Mr. Utkarsh, APP, Counsel for the Appellant\/State<\/span><\/p>\n

          Mr. Ravinder Mehandra, Adv., Counsel for the Respondent<\/span><\/p>\n

          Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

          \"protection<\/a><\/p>\n

          Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

          \"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          The Court observed that the conduct of the accused, being a stranger, approaching the victim at night while she was returning from a common washroom, and catching hold of her hand without her consent, would certainly amount to use of criminal force.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":382893,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29454,103352,39870,2543,91513,103351,74781,29587,91227,103350,32964,2850],"class_list":["post-382854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal-against-acquittal","tag-appeal-from-acquittal","tag-criminal-force","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-chandrasekharan-sudha","tag-minor-offence-doctrine","tag-outraging-modesty-of-women","tag-presumption-of-innocence","tag-section-12-pocso-act","tag-section-222-crpc","tag-section-354-ipc","tag-sexual_harassment"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC: Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand is Criminal Force | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1643,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/BLOG-76-15.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"appeal against acquittal\",\"Appeal from Acquittal\",\"Criminal Force\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha\",\"Minor offence doctrine\",\"outraging modesty of women\",\"presumption of innocence\",\"Section 12 POCSO Act\",\"Section 222 CrPC\",\"Section 354 IPC\",\"sexual harassment\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC: Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand is Criminal Force | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/BLOG-76-15.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/BLOG-76-15.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/BLOG-76-15.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC: Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand is Criminal Force | SCC Times","description":"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","og_description":"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","datePublished":"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/"},"wordCount":1643,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.webp","keywords":["appeal against acquittal","Appeal from Acquittal","Criminal Force","Delhi High Court","Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha","Minor offence doctrine","outraging modesty of women","presumption of innocence","Section 12 POCSO Act","Section 222 CrPC","Section 354 IPC","sexual harassment"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/","name":"Del HC: Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand is Criminal Force | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-30T11:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-30T12:48:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Explore why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor's Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Stranger grabbing Minor's Hand"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/30\/del-hc-stranger-grabbing-minors-hand-criminal-force-section-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explained | Why Delhi HC Upheld Acquittal Despite Holding Stranger Grabbing Minor\u2019s Hand at Night Constitute Criminal Force Under Section 354 IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BLOG-76-15.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/26\/bom-hc-victims-right-to-appeal-against-acquittal-of-accused-upheld-in-light-of-amendment-to-s-372-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Victim’s right to appeal against acquittal of accused upheld in light of amendment to S. 372 CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0M.G. Giratkar, J. quashed an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge wherein the victim's (applicant's) appeal against the acquittal of the accused was dismissed as not maintainable. The accused was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 354-D, 323 and 506 IPC. He was, however, acquitted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/28\/pocso-eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-bombay-sessions-court-convicts-man-for-1-5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":1},"title":"[POCSO] Eve teasing and roadside romeos need to be dealt with heavy hand; Bombay Sessions Court convicts man for 1.5 years for calling a minor girl an \u201citem\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Sessions Court, Borivali Division, Mumbai: In a case filed by a minor girl against the accused for offences under Sections 354, 354-D, 504 and 506 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under Section 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (POCSO), S. J. Ansari, J., convicted the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Eve-teasing-and-roadside-romeos-need-to-be-dealt-with-heavy-hand-Bombay-Sessions-Court-convicts-man-for-1.5-years-for-calling-a-minor-girl-an-item-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, as not maintainable. The application by the State sought leave to appeal against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/del-hc-s-372-crpc-does-not-entitle-the-victim-to-file-an-appeal-against-inadequate-sentence-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | S. 372 CrPC does not entitle the victim to file an appeal against inadequate sentence restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ., held that the appeal filed by the complainant (father of the deceased victim) against the judgment of the trial court, challenging the inadequacy of sentence awarded to the convict, was not maintainable. The convict was sentenced to life\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/29\/can-non-resistance-by-rape-survivors-be-the-ground-for-acquittal-for-the-accused-patna-high-court-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":4},"title":"Can non-resistance by rape survivors be the ground for acquittal for the accused? Patna High Court decides","author":"Editor","date":"June 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: While dealing with a case of rape, A M Badar, J. observed that mere non-offering of physical resistance by a rape survivor cannot amount to the consent given by a woman for sexual activity under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (\u2018IPC'). An appeal was filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","url_meta":{"origin":382854,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC’s ruling","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal Code 1860 from Section 377 IPC. The instant appeal was filed against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant. Trial Court found the appellant not guilty for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382854"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382854\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":382858,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382854\/revisions\/382858"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/382893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}