{"id":382606,"date":"2026-04-28T16:00:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=382606"},"modified":"2026-04-28T15:58:07","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T10:28:07","slug":"ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9003170989\" target=\"_blank\">Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026<\/a> (Amending Act), that provided for the continuation of the existing Labour Tribunals till the Tribunals and authorities under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000630029\" target=\"_blank\">Industrial Relations Code, 2020<\/a> (IR Code) become functional, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gopinath P.<\/span>, J., while dismissing the petition, upheld the Amending Act observing that the amended Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000629778\" target=\"_blank\">104(1-A)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000630029\" target=\"_blank\">IR Code<\/a> does not violate Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> or Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/17\/government-notified-industrial-relations-code-amendment-2026-explained\/\" target=\"_blank\">Industrial Relations Code Amendment 2026 Explained<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the provisions of the Amending Act, whereby Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000629778\" target=\"_blank\">104(1)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000630029\" target=\"_blank\">IR Code<\/a>, was amended by introducing sub-section (1-A). They contended that the provisions of the Amending Act were violative of Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The amendment provided that notwithstanding the repeal of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002756734\" target=\"_blank\">Industrial Disputes Act, 1947<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002814533\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Unions Act, 1926<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002810433\" target=\"_blank\">Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946<\/a>, the Tribunals and statutory authorities constituted under the repealed enactments would continue to function till the Tribunals and authorities under the IR Code become functional.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners submitted that they had earlier challenged a Notification dated 8 December 2025 issued by the Central Government allowing the continued functioning of such authorities till the constitution of Industrial Tribunals and National Industrial Tribunals under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000630029\" target=\"_blank\">IR Code<\/a>, and that this Court had already repelled the challenge in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.K. Suresh Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Z6qvWR26\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine Ker 2389<\/a>. However, it was urged that a writ appeal against the said decision was pending and that the present writ petition should be tagged along with the said appeal. On the other hand, the respondents submitted that considering the judgment in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.K. Suresh Kumar<\/span> (supra), the writ petition was liable to be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Also Read:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/23\/ker-hc-upholds-continuation-of-existing-labour-courts-and-tribunals\/\" target=\"_blank\">Ker HC upholds continuation of existing labour courts and tribunals<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the primary contention raised was that the amended provision was contrary to other provisions of the same enactment. The Court noted that such a contention cannot be a ground to challenge Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000629778\" target=\"_blank\">104(1-A)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000630029\" target=\"_blank\">IR Code<\/a> as the said provision starts with a non obstante clause, thereby enabling it to operate even if there is any contrary or inconsistent provision contained in the same statute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that no fundamental right of the petitioners was affected by the impugned amendment. The Court highlighted that the petitioners have no fundamental right to contend that the adjudication of disputes must only be before adjudicatory bodies constituted under the IR Code. The Court also noted that there was no pleading that Parliament lacked legislative competence or that the amendment violated the basic structure of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>While dealing with the plea of that the provisions are &#8220;manifestly arbitrary&#8221;, the Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shayara Bano<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/rLPetu3z\" target=\"_blank\">(2017) 9 SCC 1<\/a>, wherein the Court explained the expression &#8220;manifestly arbitrary&#8221; and observed that:<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;What is manifestly arbitrary is obviously unreasonable and being contrary to the rule of law, would violate Article 14. &#8230; The arbitrariness doctrine when applied to legislation obviously would not involve the latter challenge but would only involve a law being disproportionate, excessive or otherwise being manifestly unreasonable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that there was no reason to even hold that the provisions that have been challenged are arbitrary, much less manifestly arbitrary and no ground was made out to grant the reliefs sought. The Court further observed that the issues raised in the pending writ appeal arising from the earlier judgment were entirely different and found no reason to adjourn the matter to be heard along with the said appeal. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition in limine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.K. Suresh Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, W.P. (C) No. 14179 of 2026, decided on 8-4-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> A. Abdul Nabeel, Anand B. Menon, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> P. Sreekumar (ASGI).<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court clarified that Section 104(1-A), IR Code starts with a non-obstante clause, thereby enabling it to operate even if there is any contrary or inconsistent provision contained in the same statute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":382609,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[59243,78032,103202,54006,94545,103200,43884,89815,2523,103204,103203,54324,103201,94544],"class_list":["post-382606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-14-constitution","tag-article-21-constitution","tag-continuation-of-labour-tribunals","tag-industrial-disputes-act-1947","tag-industrial-employment-standing-orders-act-1946","tag-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026","tag-industrial-relations-code-2020","tag-justice-gopinath-p","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-labour-law-amendment","tag-manifestly-arbitrary","tag-non-obstante-clause","tag-section-1041-a-ir-code","tag-trade-unions-act-1926"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Continuation of existing Labour Tribunals not arbitrary: Ker HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"headline\":\"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":664,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 14 Constitution\",\"Article 21 Constitution\",\"continuation of Labour Tribunals\",\"Industrial Disputes Act 1947\",\"Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946\",\"Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act 2026\",\"Industrial Relations Code 2020\",\"Justice Gopinath P.\",\"Kerala High Court\",\"labour law amendment\",\"manifestly arbitrary\",\"non-obstante clause\",\"Section 104(1-A) IR Code\",\"Trade Unions Act 1926\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/\",\"name\":\"Continuation of existing Labour Tribunals not arbitrary: Ker HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"continuation of existing labour tribunals\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/28\\\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sunaina\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Continuation of existing Labour Tribunals not arbitrary: Ker HC | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue","og_description":"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/"},"author":{"name":"Sunaina","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"headline":"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue","datePublished":"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/"},"wordCount":664,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp","keywords":["Article 14 Constitution","Article 21 Constitution","continuation of Labour Tribunals","Industrial Disputes Act 1947","Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946","Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act 2026","Industrial Relations Code 2020","Justice Gopinath P.","Kerala High Court","labour law amendment","manifestly arbitrary","non-obstante clause","Section 104(1-A) IR Code","Trade Unions Act 1926"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/","name":"Continuation of existing Labour Tribunals not arbitrary: Ker HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-28T10:30:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Kerala High Court upholds Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 allowing continuation of existing Labour Tribunals.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"continuation of existing labour tribunals"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/28\/ker-hc-industrial-relations-code-amendment-act-2026-upheld-continuation-of-labour-tribunals-not-arbitrary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explained | Why Kerala HC Upheld the 2026 Industrial Relations Code Amendment Allowing Existing Labour Tribunals to Continue"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/continuation-of-existing-labour-tribunals.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":375891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/17\/government-notified-industrial-relations-code-amendment-2026-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":0},"title":"Repealing Provisions Revised Under the Industrial Relations Code","author":"Shubhi","date":"February 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Govt has notified the Industrial Relations Code Amendment 2026 revising the repeal provisions and ensuring continuity of existing labour tribunals.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Industrial Relations Code","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Industrial-Relations-Code.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Industrial-Relations-Code.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Industrial-Relations-Code.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Industrial-Relations-Code.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/09\/industrial-relations-code-removal-of-difficulties-order-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":1},"title":"Industrial Relations Code (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2025 &#8211; Continuity of Adjudication for Pending Cases","author":"Kriti","date":"December 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Industrial Relations Code (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2025 ensures smooth transition by transferring pending cases under old labour laws to corresponding tribunals under the new Code while maintaining adjudication continuity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Industrial Relations Code Removal of Difficulties Order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Industrial-Relations-Code-Removal-of-Difficulties-Order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Industrial-Relations-Code-Removal-of-Difficulties-Order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Industrial-Relations-Code-Removal-of-Difficulties-Order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Industrial-Relations-Code-Removal-of-Difficulties-Order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/23\/ker-hc-upholds-continuation-of-existing-labour-courts-and-tribunals\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":2},"title":"Kerala HC upholds Centre\u2019s notification on continuation of existing Labour Courts and Tribunals until new Code Tribunals are constituted","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPermitting existing adjudicatory mechanisms and statutory authorities to continue till new mechanisms are put in place cannot be said to be sidestepping the provisions of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 or removing obstacles to get over statutory restrictions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"continuation of existing Labour Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/continuation-of-existing-Labour-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/continuation-of-existing-Labour-Courts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/continuation-of-existing-Labour-Courts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/continuation-of-existing-Labour-Courts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/22\/cabinet-approves-the-industrial-relations-code-bill-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":3},"title":"Cabinet approves the Industrial Relations Code Bill, 2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet has given its approval for the introduction of the Industrial Relations Code, 2019 in the Parliament. Benefits: Setting up of two-member tribunal (in place of one member) introducing a concept that some of the important cases will be adjudicated jointly and the rest by a single member\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cabinet Decisions&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cabinet Decisions","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/cabinet_decisions\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264690,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/29\/does-the-contract-labour-regulation-abolition-act-1970-eclipse-the-industrial-disputes-rajasthan-amendment-act-1958-sc-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":4},"title":"Does the Contract Labour (Regulation &#038; Abolition) Act, 1970 eclipse the Industrial Disputes (Rajasthan Amendment) Act, 1958? SC refuses to decide the issue as the first Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where it was argued before the Court that the Industrial Disputes (Rajasthan Amendment) Act, 1958 which received the President\u2019s assent on August 12, 1958 stands eclipsed after the enactment of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Does-the-Contract-Labour-Regulation-Abolition-Act-1970-eclipse-the-Industrial-Disputes-Rajasthan-Amendment-Act-1958-SC-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-Court.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Does-the-Contract-Labour-Regulation-Abolition-Act-1970-eclipse-the-Industrial-Disputes-Rajasthan-Amendment-Act-1958-SC-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-Court.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Does-the-Contract-Labour-Regulation-Abolition-Act-1970-eclipse-the-Industrial-Disputes-Rajasthan-Amendment-Act-1958-SC-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-Court.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Does-the-Contract-Labour-Regulation-Abolition-Act-1970-eclipse-the-Industrial-Disputes-Rajasthan-Amendment-Act-1958-SC-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-Court.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Does-the-Contract-Labour-Regulation-Abolition-Act-1970-eclipse-the-Industrial-Disputes-Rajasthan-Amendment-Act-1958-SC-refuses-to-decide-the-issue-as-the-first-Court.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/25\/decoding-the-industrial-relations-code-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":382606,"position":5},"title":"Decoding the Industrial Relations Code, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aditya Gaggar*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/industrial.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/industrial.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/industrial.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/industrial.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/industrial.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382606"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":382608,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382606\/revisions\/382608"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/382609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}