{"id":382264,"date":"2026-04-24T16:30:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T11:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=382264"},"modified":"2026-04-24T16:39:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T11:09:41","slug":"sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/","title":{"rendered":"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In an appeal concerning with the validity of change in categorisation of certain land situated in District Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh, the subsequent grant of pattas in favour of the appellant by Sub-Divisional Officer and the authority of consolidation authorities to correct revenue records where such pattas were found void, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Prashant Kumar Mishra*<\/span> and N.V. Anjaria, JJ., upheld the High Court&#8217;s judgment holding that change in categorisation of land illegal and grant of pattas in favour of the appellant void ab initio. The Court held that land falling under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675130\" target=\"_blank\">132<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (1 of 1951)<\/a> (Zamindari Abolition Act), being a public utility land, cannot be converted or recategorised by subordinate revenue authorities, and any pattas granted on such invalid re-categorisation are void ab initio and confers no bhumidhari rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/14\/revenue-code-fully-applicable-areas-added-municipal-limits-after-july-7-1949-previously-governed-z-a-act-before-repeal-allahabad-hc\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Revenue Code fully applicable to areas added to municipal limits after July 7, 1949, previously governed by Z.A. Act before its repeal: Allahabad HC<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The subject land, prior to 31 October 1992, stood recorded in Category 6 in the khatauni in terms of Para A-124, U.P. Land Records Manual. Category 6 denotes barren or uncultivated land, including land covered with water, sites, roads, buildings and other non-agricultural uses. The area in question was governed by the provisions of the Zamindari Abolition Act. Category 5, on the other hand, represents cultivable land (Krishi Yogya Bhumi) with sub-classifications such as new fallow and old fallow land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant&#8217;s case was that a process was initiated to bring the land (Category 6) within the Category 5. On 5 April 1992, the Lekhpal submitted a report stating that the Land Management Committee (Gaon Sabha) had resolved to change the category of the subject land from Category 6 to Category 5. This recommendation was successively supported by the Revenue Inspector on 12 April 1992 and the Naib Tehsildar on 16 April 1992. Acting on these reports, the Tehsildar recommended reclassification of land on 31 October 1992, which was approved by the Sub-Divisional Officer on the same day. Consequent to this approval, pattas were granted in favour of the appellant and certain others, and their names came to be recorded in the revenue records.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, consolidation operations were introduced in the village under a notification issued under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001721869\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001722012\" target=\"_blank\">U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (5 of 1954)<\/a> (U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act). During these proceedings, the land settled in favour of the appellant was assigned valuation and corresponding chaks were carved out. The appellant&#8217;s name continued in the records under Section 23, and possession of the chaks was delivered on 1 July 2013. The appellant asserts continuous possession from the date of grant of pattas and thereafter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, certain individuals had initiated proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675216\" target=\"_blank\">198(4)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Zamindari Abolition Act<\/a> seeking cancellation of pattas granted to 68 persons including the appellant. The Additional Collector, Hardoi, by order dated 19 August 1994, rejected the proceedings, observing that there was no prima facie evidence to establish execution of the pattas. A revision against this order was dismissed by the Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Division, by order dated 4 August 1999.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During consolidation proceedings, however, a report dated 8 February 2016 submitted by the Consolidator indicated that the land had been recorded in 1379 Fasli as public utility land, including khalihan and pasture land, referable to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675130\" target=\"_blank\">132<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Zamindari Abolition Act<\/a>, and that pattas could not legally be granted in respect thereof. Acting on this report, and upon reference made by the District Collector, the Consolidation Officer by order dated 12 February 2019 expunged the name of the appellant and directed restoration of the land to its original category. This order was upheld by the High Court, leading to the present appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue for Consideration<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to change the categorisation of the land and, consequently, whether the pattas granted in favour of the appellant were void ab initio?<\/p>\n<h3>Statutory Framework<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court examined the statutory framework in detail and noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675123\" target=\"_blank\">129<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Zamindari Abolition Act<\/a> enumerated the classes of tenure holders, including bhumidhars and asamis. Section 195 provided for admission to land by the Land Management Committee, subject to the condition that the land must not fall within the categories specified in Section 132. Section 117 dealt with vesting of land in the Gaon Sabha, while Section 132 expressly prohibited accrual of bhumidhari rights in respect of certain lands, including pasture land and land set apart for public purposes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675130\" target=\"_blank\">132<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Zamindari Abolition Act<\/a> was of crucial significance, as it created a clear bar against conferral of bhumidhari rights in respect of specified categories of land, particularly those meant for community and public utility purposes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/utt-hc-special-provisions-created-in-favour-of-sc-community-in-u-p-zamindari-abolition-act-to-be-kept-in-mind-while-deciding-applications-matter-remanded-back-to-consolidation-officer\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Utt HC | Special provisions created in favour of SC community in U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act to be kept in mind while deciding applications; Matter remanded back to Consolidation Officer<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Findings<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found that the land in question was admittedly recorded as Category 6 and was specifically described as khalihan and pasture land. Such land, being communal in nature, falls squarely within the prohibited ambit of Section 132. A conjoint reading of Para A-124, U.P. Land Records Manual and Section 132 made it evident that such land was excluded from settlement and could not be converted into land capable of conferring bhumidhari rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court asserted that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;once the land is referable to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001675130\" target=\"_blank\">132<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862342\" target=\"_blank\">Zamindari Abolition Act<\/a>, bhumidhari rights cannot accrue in respect thereof&#8221;.<\/span> Even if it were assumed that a patta had been granted, it could only have been in the nature of an Asami patta, which under Rule 176-A is limited to a period of five years. Thus, even on that assumption, the rights claimed by the appellant would stand expired upon completion of the said period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Addressing the contention regarding re-categorisation, the Court held that Para Ka-155-Ka, U.P. Land Records Manual merely prescribed for making entries affecting rights and titles of the khatedars by the competent authority and did not confer power to alter the category of land itself. Clause (9), relating to transfer from one category of khata to another, pertained to the tenure entries and not to land classification. The provision applied only to recorded tenure holders and had no application to change of land category. Thus, reliance on the said provision was held to be misconceived and untenable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court categorically held that the Zamindari Abolition Act did not empower the Sub-Divisional Officer to alter the category of land so as to take it out of the purview of Section 132. The only mechanism for conversion lies with the State Government under Section 117(6) read with Section 77(2), U.P. Land Revenue Code, subject to stringent safeguards. This restriction demonstrates that no subordinate authority possesses such power.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Invoking the well-settled principle that what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly (Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum), the Court asserted that accepting the appellant&#8217;s contention would enable subordinate officers to circumvent the statutory prohibition under Section 132 through re-categorisation, thereby defeating legislative intent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since the re-categorisation was held to be without jurisdiction, the Court concluded that the pattas granted in favour of the appellant were void ab initio. Thus, the land continued to retain its original character as public utility land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hinch Lal Tiwari<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kamala Devi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QCLsatUn\" target=\"_blank\">(2001) 6 SCC 496<\/a>, wherein it was held that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;the lands meant for public utility and community purposes must be zealously protected and cannot be diverted for public use&#8230; Such resources constitute material assets of the community and are essentially for maintaining ecological balance and public welfare&#8221;.<\/span> It reiterated that consolidation proceedings cannot be used as a device to circumvent statutory protections.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the issue of res judicata, the Court held that the earlier proceedings did not operate as a bar, since the application in 1994 had been dismissed on the ground that execution of pattas was not established, and not on merits. The issue of legality of pattas had never been directly and substantially in issue or finally decided. Therefore, the principle of res judicata had no application.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In view of the foregoing analysis, the Court found no infirmity in the High Court&#8217;s judgment. It held that the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to change the categorisation of the land, that the pattas granted were illegal and void ab initio, and that the appellant had no enforceable bhumidhari rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, appeal was dismissed as being devoid of merit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/19\/revenue-record-is-not-a-document-of-title-mere-mentioning-of-name-in-revenue-records-will-not-create-any-right-title-or-interest-over-forest-land-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8220;Revenue record is not a document of title&#8221;; Mere mentioning of name in revenue records will not create any right, title or interest over forest land: SC<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Babu Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Consolidation Officer<\/span>, Civil Appeal No. 4633 of 2026, decided on 21-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/know-thy-judge-justice-prashant-kumar-mishra-supreme-court-legal-news-3\/\" target=\"_blank\">Prashant Kumar Mishra<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Section 132, Zamindari Abolition Act, expressly prohibits the conferment of bhumidhari rights in respect of public utility lands, including pasture lands and khalihan.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":382268,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[74653,90557,34505,102979,102978,5363,102980,67062],"class_list":["post-382264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bhumidhari-rights","tag-justice-n-v-anjaria","tag-justice-prashant-kumar-mishra","tag-land-reclassification","tag-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land","tag-supreme-court","tag-u-p-land-records-manual","tag-u-p-zamindari-abolition-and-land-reforms-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SC: Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1457,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bhumidhari rights\",\"Justice N.V. Anjaria\",\"Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra\",\"Land Reclassification\",\"Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land\",\"Supreme Court\",\"U.P. Land Records Manual\",\"U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC: Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/24\\\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC: Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court","datePublished":"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/"},"wordCount":1457,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp","keywords":["Bhumidhari rights","Justice N.V. Anjaria","Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra","Land Reclassification","Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land","Supreme Court","U.P. Land Records Manual","U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/","name":"SC: Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-24T11:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-24T11:09:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Supreme Court holds that unauthorized re-categorisation of public utility land renders pattas void ab initio and incapable of conferring bhumidhari rights.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Unauthorized Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/24\/sc-unauthorized-re-categorisation-of-public-utility-land-pattas-void\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Unauthorised Re-Categorisation of Public Utility Land Renders Pattas Void Ab Initio and Incapable of Conferring Bhumidhari Rights: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Unauthorized-Re-Categorisation-of-Public-Utility-Land.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":0},"title":"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State&#8217;s use of land for water tank and RCC centre","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhenever even a very small part of an area, reserved for a public purpose, is used for other public purpose, the Gram Sabha concerned, and officials of State will take endeavour to make out a larger consensus amongst the villagers so that they may not approach this Court to oppose\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213143,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/03\/raj-hc-court-to-take-into-account-reasons-while-determining-revision-filed-after-significant-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Court to take into account reasons while determining revision filed after significant delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., allowed the writ petition filed to challenge the order passed by the District Collector whereby revision petition was allowed and the valid pattas issued to the petitioner were cancelled. The facts of the case were that the petitioners were in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/29\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-prashant-kumar-mishra-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge- Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, started his legal career from the District Courts and High Courts of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh and was later appointed as the Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice prashant kumar mishra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-prashant-kumar-mishra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-prashant-kumar-mishra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-prashant-kumar-mishra.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-prashant-kumar-mishra.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/15\/know-thy-new-judge-justice-nv-anjaria-supreme-court-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge: Justice N.V. Anjaria","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Nilay Vipinchandra Anjaria was serving as the 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court prior to being appointed as Judge of Supreme Court in May 2025.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/23\/know-thy-judge-justice-nv-anjaria-supreme-court-of-india-profile\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":4},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice N.V. Anjaria\u2019s versatile career and notable judgments","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Nilay Vipinchandra Anjaria was serving as the 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court prior to being appointed as Judge of Supreme Court in May 2025.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314434,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/17\/centre-appoints-justice-nv-anjaria-chief-justice-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":382264,"position":5},"title":"Centre appoints Justice N.V Anjaria as 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Anjaria will succeed Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar who will demit office on 24-02-2024.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice NV Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382264"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":382270,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382264\/revisions\/382270"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/382268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}