{"id":381759,"date":"2026-04-21T12:00:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T06:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=381759"},"modified":"2026-04-21T11:52:55","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T06:22:55","slug":"reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In an application filed by the petitioner challenging model answers of competitive examination for senior teacher for which she had appeared, a Single Judge Bench of Ashok Kumar Jain, J., held that though the petitioner established that three questions from Paper 1 were wrongly assessed and expert advice lacked a concrete basis, no relief could be granted as it would have wide repercussions on all candidates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the petition and stated that reference relied upon by Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) should be non-controversial, particularly looking to the age of artificial intelligence where fake and false information is readily available on all the sources of internet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">Read more: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/05\/education-law-rights-of-teachers-judgements-laws-india-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">Empowering Educators: Unpacking Laws, Landmark Judgements, and Rights of Teachers<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the petitioner filed an application for post of senior teacher (Sanskrit) pursuant to an advertisement issued by Respondent 2- RPSC. As per scheme and syllabus of competitive examination for Senior Teacher, the selection was based on written examination carrying 500 marks. There were two papers &#8212; Paper 1 of 200 marks and Paper 2 of 300 marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After the papers were conducted, the model answer key was released inviting objections to which the petitioner did not submit any but after final answer key, she approached the Court challenging the final answer key in respect of Question Nos. 3, 26, 30, 90, and 95 of Paper 1 and Question No. 84 of Paper 2.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 3 of Paper 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the question concerned, pertaining to Nagnechi Mata Mandir, was deleted by RPSC on the ground that the temple in the question concerned was situated in Jodhpur fort, and there was a village in Barmer District, therefore two answers were correct. The Court further stated that due to ambiguity, the experts recommended its deletion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering petitioner&#8217;s argument that Hindi book published by Rajasthan Hindi Granth Academy Ministry of Education, Government of India, titled as &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajasthan Ka Itihas, Sanskriti, Parampara and Virasat<\/span>&#8221; mentioned that the said temple was established at Nagana Village, which is in Barmer District, the Court stated that the experts relied upon internet content titled as Mission Kuldevi (Indian castes and their Gods) which mentioned that Nagnechi temple is also situated in Jodhpur fort.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that there was no substance in the recommendation of the expert and that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">it was not only against the history of Rajasthan, but also contrary to the material published and recognised by the government<\/span>. The Court observed that the deletion was illegal and illogical.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 26 of Paper 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the question, concerning 18th National Jamboree, was deleted in the final answer sheet, but in the model answer key, the correct option was given.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the petitioner relied upon the Jamboree history published on the website of Rajasthan Scouts and Guides and contended that the given option was incorrect, as Rajasthan had already hosted the National Jamboree in 1956 at Jaipur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that the RPSC acted on the opinion of experts, who found the question to be ambiguous and capable of multiple interpretations as while one source suggested that Rajasthan got the opportunity to host the Jamboree after 67 years, the official publication of the Government of Rajasthan mentioned that the opportunity arose after 66 years, referring to the event held from 4 January 2023 to 10 January 2023 at Rohat, Pali.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the question suffered from ambiguity<\/span>, thus, the deletion of the question by RPSC was held to be justified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 30 of Paper 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the question pertained to the approximate percentage of the world&#8217;s population living in the Northern Hemisphere, for which the experts of RPSC treated option (4), that is, 90 per cent, as correct based on newspaper articles.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner relied upon the Class 12th Geography book published by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, which is an authenticated and prescribed study material in schools, wherein it is stated that approximately 85 per cent of the world&#8217;s population resides in the Northern Hemisphere, while 15 per cent resides in the Southern Hemisphere.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further found that the experts had based their opinion on online newspaper articles without proper verification, instead of relying on standard academic sources. The Court stated that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">such reliance raised doubts regarding the competency and approach of the experts in selecting appropriate references<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that none of the given options were correct, and the question ought to have been deleted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 90 of Paper 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the question concerned was regarding the Ahar culture and was deleted by RPSC, however, in the model answer key, option (3), that is, red &amp; black urn, was indicated as correct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the experts and RPSC relied upon the book <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Rajasthan Ka Itihas&#8221;<\/span>. However, on perusal of the same book, the Court found that it clearly mentioned that the Ahar culture is associated with red and black ware (urn).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">recommendation of the experts was contrary to the very material relied upon by them<\/span>. The Court stated that the deletion was unwarranted and a serious error.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 95 of Paper 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the question pertained to the work of Amir Khusro in which the invasion of Chittor by Alauddin Khilji was described.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the experts relied upon the book published by Rajasthan Hindi Granth Academy, wherein it was mentioned that Amir Khusro, who accompanied Alauddin Khilji during the attack on Chittor, described the invasion in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tarikh-i-Alai (Khazain-ul-Futuh)<\/span>. This indicated that both option (1) and option (2) referred to the same work, thereby making both answers correct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the petitioner also relied upon the same source, which corroborated that the invasion was described in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tarikh-i-Alai (Khazain-ul-Futuh)<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the question had multiple correct answers<\/span>, and the deletion was justified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous;\">Question No. 84 of Paper 2<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner challenged the question concerned on the ground that it was out of the syllabus. However, the Court observed that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">petitioner had not raised any objection immediately after the examination or upon publication of the model answer key<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that several candidates had raised objections to the answer key, out of which 34 objections specifically alleged that the question was out of syllabus. These objections were duly considered by experts. Upon examination, the experts referred to relevant academic sources and concluded that the topic formed part of the prescribed course at the university level, and the material concerned was included in books recommended for graduation studies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that it could not be said that said question was out of the syllabus.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the issue involved in the case at hand was <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">whether the petitioner was entitled to seek relief<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">the power of judicial review is a basic feature of the Constitution, and it enables the Constitutional Court to examine the legality, procedural fairness, and reasonableness of administrative actions. However, the principle is subject to certain limitations particularly when its involvement of expertise of the subject or the domain expert and requires technical expertise, wherein the doctrine of restraint is applicable.<\/span>&#8221; The Court further stated that in such circumstances and as a writ court, the Court must be careful and cautious when reviewing administrative decisions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">it is expected from the RPSC to ensure that the subject experts are persons having good academic record with excellent academic expertise. Moreover, the reference relied upon by them is non-controversial, particularly looking to the age of artificial intelligence where fake and false information is readily available on all the sources of internet.<\/span>&#8221; Further, the Court deprecated the practice of the experts relying upon newspaper articles like &#8220;Washington Post&#8221; or &#8220;Hindustan Times&#8221; in arriving at a conclusion of a question as well as the practice of the expert to answer and reject the objections in one line and that too without assigning a convincing reason.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">the petitioner has not filed any objection after publication of model answer key, therefore, she has no right to challenge the questions which she has attempted and few of them were changed after publication of model answer key.<\/span>&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that though petitioner was able to establish that three questions of Paper 1 were wrongly assessed by the RPSC and that the expert advice was not based upon a concrete material, but despite all <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the petitioner was not entitled for any relief on any of the ground as the exercise would involve a large-scale repercussion on all candidates<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court dismissed the petition at hand.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Poonam Garg<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9572 of 2024, decided on 27-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Arihant Samdaria, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Devansh Sharma, Dy. G.C. and Shreyansh Jain, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It is expected from the RPSC to ensure that the subject experts are persons having good academic record with excellent academic expertise. We strongly deprecate the practice of the experts relying upon newspaper articles like &#8220;Washington Post&#8221; or &#8220;Hindustan Times&#8221; in arriving at a conclusion of a question. We also deprecate the practice of the expert to answer and reject the objections in one line and that too without assigning a convincing reason.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":381762,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[102732,30528,102733,70237,102736,2575,48883,102737,102734,102735],"class_list":["post-381759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-academic-expertise","tag-answer-key","tag-good-academic-record","tag-justice-ashok-kumar-jain","tag-model-answers","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-rajasthan-public-service-commission","tag-reference-book","tag-senior-teacher-sanskrit","tag-subject-experts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Reliance on non-controversial sources by RPSC essential in AI age: Raj HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-21T06:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Reliance on non-controversial sources by RPSC essential in AI age: Raj HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T06:30:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"RPSC use non-controversial sources\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reliance on non-controversial sources by RPSC essential in AI age: Raj HC| SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-21T06:30:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/","name":"Reliance on non-controversial sources by RPSC essential in AI age: Raj HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-21T06:30:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that reference relied upon by RPSC should be non-controversial, particularly in the age of artificial intelligence; denies relief to senior teacher applicant over potential repercussions on all candidates.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"RPSC use non-controversial sources"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/21\/reliance-on-non-controversial-sources-by-rpsc-essential-in-ai-age-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan HC Stresses Need for Reliance on Non-controversial Sources by RPSC in AI Age, but Denies Relief Citing Potential Repercussions on All Candidates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/RPSC-use-non-controversial-sources.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282016,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/rajasthan-high-court-to-get-9-new-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":0},"title":"Rajasthan High Court to get 9 new Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The President has appointed the following as the Judges of Rajasthan High Court in that order of seniority, with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices. Shri Ganesh Ram Meena; Shri Anil Kumar Upman; Dr. Nupur Bhati; Shri Rajendra Prakash Soni; Shri Ashok Kumar Jain; Shri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":278713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/28\/sc-collegium-approves-8-elevations-to-rajasthan-high-court-transfer-of-7-high-court-judges-2-permanent-judges-to-chattisgarh-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":1},"title":"SC Collegium approves 8 elevations to Rajasthan High Court; transfer of 7 High Court judges; 2 Permanent Judges to Chattisgarh High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 On 23-11-2022, the Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Additional Judges as Permanent Judges in the Chhattisgarh High Court: Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, and Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi. On 23-11-2022, the Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image29.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":279144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/06\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-against-government-school-teacher-accused-of-molestin-student-third-party-files-pil-supreme-court-to-hear-as-slp-legal-research-non-compundable-offence-updates-law-new\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":2},"title":"Third party files PIL against Rajasthan HC&#8217;s order quashing FIR accusing Govt school teacher of molesting his student. SC agrees to hear matter but under Article 136","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioners have told the Court that though they are not directly affected by Rajasthan High Court's order, they had approached the Court as the State, which is the Guardian of the interests of the persons living in the State, has chosen not to appeal and if the accused teacher\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"molestation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-400.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":345168,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/raj-hc-quashes-censure-order-against-chemistry-teacher-for-students-poor-result-in-12th-board-exam-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes censure order against Chemistry teacher for student\u2019s poor result in 12th Board Exam","author":"Ritu","date":"April 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPerusal of the impugned orders indicates that it is apparently a non-speaking and unreasoned order and it nowhere mentions as to how the petitioner was responsible for the result being lower than the standard norms fixed by the respondents.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325134,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/raj-hc-issues-notice-to-nta-and-union-of-india-seeking-reply-on-neet-ug-2024-exams-cancellation-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court issues notice to NTA and Union of India seeking reply on NEET-UG 2024 exam\u2019s cancellation","author":"Ritu","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court adjourned and scheduled the matter on 10-07-2024, thereby allowing the respondents time to file their replies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213085,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/rajasthan-hc-elevation-of-advocates-as-judges-sc-collegium-appoints-2-judicial-officers-of-rajasthan-hc-as-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":381759,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan HC | Elevation of Judicial Officers as Judges: SC Collegium appoints 2 Judicial Officers of Rajasthan HC as Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for appointment of following eleven Judicial Officers as Judges of the Rajasthan High Court: Shri Abhay Chaturvedi Shri Devendra Kachhawaha Shri Satish Kumar Sharma Ms. Prabha Sharma Shri Manoj Kumar Vyas Shri Rameshwar Vyas Shri Devendra Joshi Shri Chandra Kumar Songara Shri Anoop Kumar Saxena Shri Narendra Singh Dhaddha\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381759"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381759\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381761,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381759\/revisions\/381761"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/381762"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}