{"id":381410,"date":"2026-04-18T09:30:46","date_gmt":"2026-04-18T04:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=381410"},"modified":"2026-04-17T19:45:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T14:15:57","slug":"order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Save Missed Written Statement Deadline in Commercial Suits\" width=\"563\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/JI8lgSpdiEE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":381411,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90923],"tags":[34237,2543,102559,22434,61880,102558],"class_list":["post-381410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-watch-now-2","tag-commercial-suits","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-mandatory-timelines","tag-order-vii-rule-11-cpc","tag-procedural-law","tag-written-statement-deadline"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC: Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Extend Written Statement Deadline<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-18T04:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC: Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Extend Written Statement Deadline\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-18T04:00:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC written statement deadline\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC: Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Extend Written Statement Deadline","description":"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies","og_description":"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-18T04:00:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/","name":"Delhi HC: Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Extend Written Statement Deadline","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-18T04:00:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Delhi High Court in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain holds that filing an Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application cannot revive a lapsed written statement deadline in commercial suits. Timelines remain mandatory.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC written statement deadline"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/18\/order-7-rule-11-cpc-written-statement-deadline-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Revive Lapsed Written Statement Deadline: Delhi High Court Clarifies"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC-written-statement-deadline.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/16\/del-hc-plea-taken-by-defendant-in-written-statement-is-wholly-irrelevant-the-stage-of-deciding-or-7-r-11-cpc-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Plea taken by defendant in written statement is wholly irrelevant at the stage of deciding Or. 7 R. 11 CPC application","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order passed by\u00a0Civil Judge whereby defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The plaintiff filed a recovery suit against the defendant (petitioner) on account of selling them wooden furniture. The suit was instituted in Delhi as the plaintiff was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225066,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/03\/del-hc-permission-to-amend-written-statement-after-plaintiffs-evidence-denied-in-view-of-proviso-to-order-6-rule-17-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Permission to amend written statement after plaintiff&#8217;s evidence denied in view of proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J., dismissed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby it had rejected the petitioner-defendant's application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC (amendment of pleadings)\u00a0seeking amendment in their written statement. The instant suit which was filed for specific performance in 2005 had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/court-free-to-invoke-provisions-of-order-8-rule-10-cpc-if-defendant-fails-to-file-ws-permanent-injunction-granted-against-use-of-trademark-cbn-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":2},"title":"Court free to invoke provisions of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC if defendant fails to file WS; permanent injunction granted against use of trademark CBN NEWS","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J. decreed a suit for permanent injunction by invoking the provisions of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. The plaintiff was involved in broadcasting activities such as news reporting, producing TV shows and other media content in various parts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-on-application-of-principle-of-res-judicata-and-other-cpc-provisions-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court judgment on application of principle of Res Judicata and other CPC provisions","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that before examining the defendants\u2019 ground of res judicata to oppose the eviction petition, several aspects may have to be looked into, like whether such an issue was substantively at issue in the previous suit and similar such other questions may crop up.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"latest judgement of supreme court on res judicata","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379683,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/30\/del-hc-order-7-rule-11-cpc-plea-does-not-revive-ws-filing-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":4},"title":"Del HC: Order 7 Rule 11 application filed after expiry of statutory time doesn\u2019t revive lapsed right to file Written Statement","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFiling of an application for rejection of plaint by Defendant 2 after lapse of statutory period for filing written statement, will not entitle Defendant 2 for grant of any extension of time for filing written statement on that ground.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Order 7 Rule 11 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Order-7-Rule-11-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/04\/powers-under-order-viii-rule-9-cpc-to-be-exercised-by-the-courts-only-in-cases-of-set-off-counter-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":381410,"position":5},"title":"Powers under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC to be exercised by the courts only in cases of set off\/counter claim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., partly allowed a writ petition filed against an order passed by the trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC had been rejected by the trial court. The main issue that arose before the Court was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381410"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381415,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381410\/revisions\/381415"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/381411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}