{"id":381165,"date":"2026-04-16T12:30:13","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T07:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=381165"},"modified":"2026-04-16T12:52:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T07:22:41","slug":"disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed challenging the order dated 6 July 2020 by which the petitioner&#8217;s candidature for the post of Junior Assistant was rejected, <span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">the Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karunesh Singh Pawar<\/span>, J.<\/span>, held that the rejection of candidature solely on the ground of pendency of a criminal case, which had been truthfully disclosed by the petitioner and arose out of a matrimonial dispute with general allegations, was unsustainable. Quashing the impugned order, the Court directed the authorities to issue the appointment letter to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The U.P. Subordinate Services Selection Commission advertised vacancies for the posts of Junior Assistant and Store Keeper. The petitioner applied for the post of Junior Assistant, qualified in the selection process, and was allotted the Department of Cane and Sugar Commissioner, U.P., through the online Department Allotment System. He was also referred for medical examination and was found medically fit. However, the petitioner was denied appointment after verification revealed the pendency of a criminal case under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546433\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the case arose from a matrimonial dispute between his elder brother and his wife and that he had already disclosed the pendency of the case in accordance with the relevant clauses of the advertisement.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that other than the pendency of the criminal case which was duly disclosed by the petitioner, there was no other adverse material against him, and the impugned order was passed solely on account of the pendency of the said criminal case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying on the principles laid in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Avtar Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T8sh6YeI\" target=\"_blank\">(2016) 8 SCC 471<\/a>, the Court noted that where a candidate truthfully discloses the pendency of a criminal case of trivial nature, the employer may, in appropriate circumstances, appoint the candidate subject to the outcome of the case. The Court further found that the FIR contained general and sweeping allegations against all family members without assigning any specific role to the petitioner and that the dispute arose out of a domestic matrimonial conflict and that the offences alleged were not sufficiently grave to render the petitioner unsuitable for public employment, particularly when the allegations had no bearing on the duties attached to the post.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also referred to the observations of the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Avtar Singh<\/span> (supra) while discussing <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Commr. of Police<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sandeep Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/TZ54oav8\" target=\"_blank\">(2011) 4 SCC 644<\/a>, where it was emphasised that youthful indiscretions and minor offences should not result in branding a person as a criminal for life and that the approach should be reformative rather than punitive. In that context, the Supreme Court had illustratively referred to the character &#8220;Jean Valjean&#8221; from Victor Hugo&#8217;s <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Les Mis&eacute;rables<\/span> to highlight that minor infractions, particularly those arising from personal or family circumstances, should not lead to lifelong adverse consequences.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Applying these principles, the Court held that the offences alleged do not constitute valid ground to render the petitioner unsuitable for public employment, and directed Respondent 2, to issue appointment letter to the petitioner, subject to the outcome of criminal appeal\/trial if any.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rakesh Kumar<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Verma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/o1ZU7LHQ\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine All 1238<\/a>, decided on 23-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Manish Chaudhary, Chandra Prakash Pal, Deepika Srivastava, Mamta Singh, Prashant Jaiswal, Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, Shivendra Pratap Singh<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> C.S.C.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The allegations, on the face of record, appear to be trivial in nature and arise out of a domestic dispute, having no bearing on the discharge of duties attached to the post in question.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":381170,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,52786,95599,67086,44139,102417,102416],"class_list":["post-381165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-dowry-prohibition-act-1961","tag-justice-karunesh-singh-pawar","tag-pending-criminal-case","tag-public-employment","tag-sections-498-a-323-504-506-of-the-indian-penal-code-1860","tag-trivial-allegations"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC: Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T07:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T07:22:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"All HC: Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T07:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-16T07:22:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC: Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment| SCC Times","description":"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC","og_description":"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-16T07:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-16T07:22:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/","name":"All HC: Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-16T07:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-16T07:22:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Allahabad High Court holds that truthful disclosure of Pending matrimonial case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Pending case involving trivial allegations cannot bar public employment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/16\/disclosure-of-pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employement-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Truthful Disclosure of Pending Matrimonial Case Involving Trivial Allegations Cannot Bar Public Employment: Allahabad HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Pending-case-involving-trivial-allegations-cannot-bar-public-employment.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/sc-collegium-28-additional-judges-of-allahabad-hc-to-be-permanent\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":0},"title":"SC Collegium | 28 Additional Judges of Allahabad HC to be Permanent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for appointment of following Additional Judges of Allahabad High Court as Permanent Judges of that High Court: Justice Prakash Padia, Justice Alok Mathur, Justice Pankaj Bhatia, Justice Saurabh Lavania, Justice Vivek Varma, Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh, Justice Piyush Agrawal, Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/president-appoints-28-additional-judges-as-judges-of-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":1},"title":"President appoints 28 Additional Judges as Judges of Allahabad High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"President of India in the exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, appointed Justices Prakash Padia, Alok Mathur, Pankaj Bhatia, Saurabh Lavania,\u00a0 Vivek Varma, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Piyush Agrawal, Shriaurabh Shyam Shamshery, Jaspreet Singh, Rajeev Singh, Manju Rani Chauhan, Karunesh Singh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/employer-to-exercise-discretion-in-matters-of-canceling-candidature-in-accordance-with-law-laid-down-by-the-apex-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":2},"title":"Employer to exercise discretion in matters of cancelling candidature in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. disposed of a petition where petitioner was selected for appointment to the post of Constable in U.P. Police in the recruitment exercise initiated in the year 2015. He had to be trained but his candidature was not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287958,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/allahabad-hc-declines-to-quash-23-year-old-criminal-case-against-indian-politician-and-congress-mp-randeep-singh-surjewala-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad HC declines to quash 23-year-old criminal case against Indian politician and congress MP Randeep Singh Surjewala","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that Randeep Singh had already been directed to be released on bail and he has got right of discharge under Section 239, 245 or 227 CrPC. through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/23\/bombay-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-candidature-to-bhabha-atomic-research-center-for-suppressing-criminal-antecedents-in-declaration-form\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court upholds rejection of candidature to Bhabha Atomic Research Center for suppressing criminal antecedents in declaration form","author":"Editor","date":"September 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case filed by Swapnil Prakash Parab (\u2018petitioner\u2019) challenging rejection to the representation made before Bhabha Atomic Research Centre\/BARC (\u2018Respondent 2\u2019) on the orders of the Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/allahabad-high-court-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-as-slp-is-pending-in-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":381165,"position":5},"title":"Allahabad High Court stays criminal proceedings against Delhi&#8217;s CM Arvind Kejriwal as SLP is pending in Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Criminal proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal in Sultanpur Court have been stayed by Allahabad High Court, considering that special leave to appeal is still pending in Supreme Court and if it is allowed, then the entire proceedings would be a futile exercise.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381165"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381165\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381172,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381165\/revisions\/381172"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/381170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}