{"id":381046,"date":"2026-04-15T13:00:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T07:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=381046"},"modified":"2026-04-18T09:35:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-18T04:05:41","slug":"maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

MP High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>, challenging the order passed by Principal, Government Tilak PG College, Katni (M.P.), which granted 6 months of maternity leave to the petitioner but without honorarium, a Single Judge Bench of Vishal Dhagat*, J<\/span>., set aside the impugned order and held that the bar of eighty working days in the preceding twelve months, in an establishment, as per Section 5<\/a>, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961<\/a>, does not apply to establishments under State Government.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

On 16 June 2023, an order was passed by Principal, Government Tilak PG College, Katni (M.P.), granting maternity leave to petitioner for the period of 6 months but without honorarium. It was passed in accordance with Circular of State Government and Section 5<\/a>, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961<\/a>, subsequently, to amend the previous one which granted maternity leave with honorarium. However, the petitioner challenged contending that the said order was bad in law and paid maternity leave should be granted to her as per the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.<\/p>\n

On the contrary, the respondents contended that since the petitioner was a guest faculty and engaged on contract basis, she did not fulfil the criteria of a government employee, which made the MP Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 inapplicable to her. Hence, the previous order granting leave with honorarium was modified and leave of 6 months was sanctioned without it.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/p>\n

The Court, while deciding upon the question as to whether the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 is applicable to petitioner or not, referred to the definition of “establishment” under Section 2(1)<\/a>, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961<\/a> and observed that the definition of establishment given in Section 2(1) is wide and covers any establishment belonging to government and where ten or more persons are employed on any day preceding twelve months. On such findings, the Court held that the Act is applicable to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the Act gives right to payment of maternity benefit to every woman upon having been employed in establishment not less than 80 days in a year preceding date of expected delivery, as per Section 5 of the Act. Further, the benefit of payment of wages for 26 weeks is to be granted to a woman and breakup of 26 weeks is 8 weeks before expected date of delivery and 18 weeks after delivery, permissible only if a woman has worked not less than 80 days in 12 months.<\/p>\n

Highlighting the directive principles of State policy, the Court referred to Articles 38<\/a> and 39<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>, which respectively state that the State shall strive to promote welfare of people and shall direct its policy towards securing health of workers, men, women and children of tender age. Mentioning the guidelines for the State Government to formulate its policy, the Court held that the bar of 80 working days in 12 months for availing benefit of grant of maternity leave, shall not be applicable over establishment of State Government and State is required to take welfare measures for its citizens.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/h3>\n

Therefore, the Court set aside the impugned order and granted maternity leave to the petitioner for 26 weeks, i.e., 8 weeks before expected date of delivery and 18 weeks after period of delivery, in accordance with Section 5(1)<\/a>, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961<\/a>. For rest of leave period, the Court directed that no honorarium to be paid to petitioner and the said period will be treated to be leave without pay.<\/p>\n

[Priti Saket<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span>, 2026 SCC OnLine MP 5246<\/a>, decided on 24-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Vishal Dhagat<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Appellants:<\/span> Hitendra Kumar Golhani, Ms. Kajal Vishwakarma<\/p>\n

For Respondents:<\/span> Kamal Singh Baghel<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The petitioner was granted the benefit of maternity leave without fulfilling the requirement of eighty working days at the ‘Establishment’ in the preceding twelve months by the MP High Court.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":381047,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[102322,37681,3402,102324,102318,102321,61779,102317,102319,53967,97620,102323,102320,102325],"class_list":["post-381046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-benefit-of-wages","tag-directive-principles-of-state-policy","tag-establishment","tag-grant-of-maternity-leave","tag-guestfaculty","tag-madhya-pradesh-civil-services-leave-rules","tag-maternity-benefit-act-1961","tag-maternitybenefitact","tag-maternityleave","tag-mp-high-court","tag-mphighcourt","tag-paid-maternity-leave","tag-stategovernmentestablishments","tag-vishal-dhagat-j"],"yoast_head":"\nMP High Court: Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-15T07:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-18T04:05:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"MP High Court: Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T07:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-18T04:05:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP High Court: Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty | SCC Times","description":"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments","og_description":"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-15T07:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-18T04:05:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/","name":"MP High Court: Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-15T07:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-18T04:05:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The MP High Court has held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to guest faculty, ruling that the eighty working days requirement is inapplicable to State Government establishments.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/maternity-benefit-act-applies-to-guest-faculty-mp-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maternity Benefit Act Applies to Guest Faculty: MP High Court Holds Eighty Working Days Bar Inapplicable to State Government Establishments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Maternity-Benefit-Act-Applies-to-Guest-Faculty.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":94271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/22\/maternity-leave-can-be-granted-to-women-government-servant-even-if-she-is-working-on-contractual-basis-ad-hoctenure-or-temporary-basis\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":0},"title":"Maternity leave can be granted to women government servant even if she is working on contractual basis, ad hoc\/tenure or temporary basis","author":"Saba","date":"December 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Uttaranchal: The Court while hearing a petition relating to the issue of maternity leave not been granted to the petitioner since she was a contractual employee working under the respondent, the Bench comprising of Rajiv Sharma and Alok Singh, JJ., observed that even though the petitioner is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":330638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/12\/all-women-employees-entitled-to-180-days-maternity-leave-irrespective-of-nature-of-employment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":1},"title":"All women employees entitled to 180 days Maternity Leave, irrespective of nature of employment: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMotherhood is one of the most profound and rewarding experiences in a woman\u2019s life. It is a blessing that transcends societal boundaries, cultural norms and professional roles.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348957,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/28\/population-control-maternity-leave-need-to-be-rationally-harmonised-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":2},"title":"Objectives of population control & providing maternity leave to working women not mutually exclusive & must be rationally harmonised: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant case, the appellant was denied maternity leave for a third child on account of her re-marriage. The Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to grant of maternity leave.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maternity leave","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/maternity-leave.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/maternity-leave.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255798,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/19\/a-woman-employee-cannot-be-discriminated-on-the-basis-of-mode-of-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | \u201cA woman employee cannot be discriminated on the basis of mode of appointment\u201d; HC holds a contractual employee is equally entitled to maternity benefits","author":"Editor","date":"October 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: S. N. Pathak, J., directed the State of Jharkhand to provide maternity benefits to a contractual employee whose demand for honorarium for the duration of maternity leave was not addressed by the authorities concerned. The Bench stated, \u201cA woman employee cannot be discriminated on the basis of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/allahabad-high-court-grants-relief-to-woman-highlighting-no-stipulation-regarding-the-time-difference-between-the-first-and-second-child-for-availing-maternity-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":4},"title":"Allahabad High Court grants relief to woman highlighting no stipulation regarding the time difference between the first and second child for availing maternity benefits","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: Alok Mathur, J. allowed a writ petition which was filed by the petitioner working as Lecturer (Hindi) in Rajkiya Balika Inter College, Hardoi. She was aggrieved by the order whereby her application for maternity leave from 18-11-2018 to 16-5-2019 had been rejected on the ground\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/maternity-leave-to-female-government-employee-for-third-child-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":381046,"position":5},"title":"Himachal Pradesh HC allows maternity leave to female government employee for her third child; reiterates stand taken by SC in K. Umadevi [2025]","author":"Editor","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner had given birth to her two children prior to her induction in service but her prayer\u00a0for maternity leave, though for her third child, came to be made for the first time during the service.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"third child maternity leave","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/third-child-maternity-leave.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381046"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381421,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381046\/revisions\/381421"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/381047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}