{"id":380855,"date":"2026-04-12T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-12T08:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=380855"},"modified":"2026-04-11T16:21:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-11T10:51:20","slug":"sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/","title":{"rendered":"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Sabarimala: Are Religious Practices About Faith or Equality?\" width=\"563\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/6jpghMEj93M?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":380856,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90923],"tags":[51721,102229,102228,72150,68410,32618,44244,102227,102035],"class_list":["post-380855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-watch-now-2","tag-constitutionofindia","tag-faithandlaw","tag-genderdebate","tag-indianjudiciary","tag-religiousfreedom","tag-sabarimala","tag-supremecourt","tag-templetraditions","tag-tusharmehta"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sabarimala Hearing: Tushar Mehta on Faith vs Gender Practices<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-12T08:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/\",\"name\":\"Sabarimala Hearing: Tushar Mehta on Faith vs Gender Practices\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-12T08:30:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Sabarimala Constitution Bench Hearing\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sabarimala Hearing: Tushar Mehta on Faith vs Gender Practices","description":"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric","og_description":"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-12T08:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/","name":"Sabarimala Hearing: Tushar Mehta on Faith vs Gender Practices","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-12T08:30:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"During the Sabarimala hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that religious practices are rooted in faith and belief, not gender symmetry, citing temples with gender-specific traditions as a nine-judge Bench revisits the 2018 ruling.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Sabarimala Constitution Bench Hearing"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/12\/sabarimala-hearing-faith-vs-gender-tushar-mehta\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sabarimala Hearing: SG Tushar Mehta Defends Faith-Based Practices, Says Religion Is Not Gender-Centric"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-Constitution-Bench-Hearing.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/19\/day-3-sabarimala-temple-women-believe-in-sabarimala-temple-it-is-a-devotion-that-makes-a-devotee-visit-a-temple-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":0},"title":"[Day-3] \u00a0Sabarimala Temple| Women believe in Sabarimala Temple, it is a devotion that makes a devotee visit a temple: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., resumed with the third day of the proceedings on the \u2018Sabarimala Temple\u2019 hearing. Amicus Curiae Raju Ramachandran resumed with his arguments by referring to Constitutional assembly debates on \u2018Untouchability\u2019.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/08\/sabarimala-hearing-justice-nagarathna-article-17-menstruation-exclusion\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":1},"title":"Sabarimala Hearing: Justice B.V. Nagarathna on Use of Article 17 in Menstruation-Based Exclusion","author":"Editor","date":"April 8, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtube.com\/shorts\/PlaDxaWay84?feature=share","rel":"","context":"In &quot;WATCH NOW&quot;","block_context":{"text":"WATCH NOW","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sabarimala hearing Article 17","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-hearing-Article-17.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-hearing-Article-17.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-hearing-Article-17.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Sabarimala-hearing-Article-17.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/kerala-hc-pil-seeking-declarations-that-royal-family-of-pandalam-has-no-right-over-sabarimala-temple-and-thazhaman-family-has-no-thantric-rights-in-sabarimala-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Issue of right over Sabarimala Temple is matter of religious belief and practice; jurisdiction in PIL not warranted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Hrishikesh Roy and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, JJ. was seized of a petition structured as a Public Interest Litigation praying for the following declarations: that the Royal Family of Pandalam does not have any right over the Sabarimala temple; that the Thazhaman Family\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/15\/heres-why-sabarimala-review-hearing-may-not-begin-from-jan-22\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":3},"title":"Here&#8217;s why Sabarimala Review hearing may not begin from Jan 22","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0\u00a0The Court said that it may not start the hearing on pleas seeking review of the Sabarimala verdict from January 22 , as Justice Indu Malhotra, one of the judges is on medical leave. Justice Indu Malhotra was the only\u00a0woman judge of the five-judge constitution bench which had delivered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/sabarimala-verdict-review-judgment-reserved\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":4},"title":"Sabarimala Verdict review: Judgment Reserved","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ has reserved verdict on a batch of petitions seeking review of its September 28, 2018 judgement that allowed women of all age groups to enter the Sabarimala temple in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/12\/sabarimala-review-petitions-to-be-heard-tomorrow-against-the-supreme-courts-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":380855,"position":5},"title":"Sabarimala| Review Petitions to be heard tomorrow against the Supreme Court\u2019s verdict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Ranjan Gogoi and R.F Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ. will hear the review petitions in the Sabarimala Temple case against the decision allowing women\u2019s entry in Sabarimala Temple tomorrow\u00a0i.e. 13-11-2018 in chambers. Background: A 5-Judge Constitution Bench, by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380855"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380855\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380909,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380855\/revisions\/380909"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/380856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}