{"id":380815,"date":"2026-04-13T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T04:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=380815"},"modified":"2026-04-15T15:46:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T10:16:01","slug":"nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Uttaranchal High Court:<\/span> In the connected appeals preferred under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519660\" target=\"_blank\">374(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) challenging the common judgment dated 18 February 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani (trial court) where by both appellants were convicted under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\">363<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\">366-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(l)<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561705\" target=\"_blank\">376-D<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), the Division Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ashish Naithani* and<\/span> Ravindra Maithani, JJ.,set aside Appellant 2&#8217;s convictions under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(l)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561705\" target=\"_blank\">376-D<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, set aside Appellant 1&#8217;s convictions under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(l)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561705\" target=\"_blank\">376-D<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\">366-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and affirmed the conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\">363<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court held that the evidentiary value of the forensic evidence does not rest solely upon the scientific conclusions but equally upon the sanctity, continuity, and transparency of the chain through which such forensic exhibits pass and any unexplained break or infirmity in this chain would have the potential to erode the reliability of the scientific opinion.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The prosecution case commenced with a missing report lodged on 8 March 2018 by the victim&#8217;s brother stating that the victim, described as a 13-year-old girl suffering from intellectual disability and speech difficulty, had gone missing on 7 March 2018 at about 4:00 p.m.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After being found the next evening, it was discovered by her blood-stained pyjamas, injury marks and signs and gestures made by her that she had been sexually and physically assaulted. In a CCTV footage, one of the Appellants was seen with her the night she went missing so the FIR was filed and the medical examination of the victim was conducted. The Medical report neither confirmed rape nor ruled out its possibility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per the Forensic report, one of the Appellant&#8217;s DNA matched whereas the other&#8217;s did not. On the basis of the overall evidence on record, the trial court convicted the appellants under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\">363<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\">366-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(l)<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561705\" target=\"_blank\">376-D<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> Assailing the same, the present appeal was filed by the appellants.<\/p>\n<h3>Observations and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in the medical examination, which was conducted after 3 days from the incident, the victim could not respond to the questions related to sexual violence due to her intellectual disability and speech difficulty. The medical findings suggested sexual activity but no definite conclusion regarding rape could be drawn.<\/p>\n<p>The Court went on to examine the reliability of the chain of custody in respect of the forensic exhibits stating that such infirmities do not render the whole forensic evidence inadmissible, however convictions should not be solely based on such material. The Court went on to state,<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The evidentiary value of forensic material does not rest solely upon the scientific conclusions drawn by the Forensic Science Laboratory, but equally upon the sanctity, continuity, and transparency of the chain through which such exhibits pass, commencing from the point of collection and culminating in forensic examination. Any unexplained break or infirmity in this chain would have the potential to erode the reliability of the scientific opinion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Due to absence of a complete and demonstrable chain of custody of forensic evidence and anomalies therein, the Court held that the forensic findings cannot be treated as conclusive in itself and must be evaluated as corroborative. Since the prosecution relied solely upon forensic and medical evidence and the foundational requirement of an unbroken and duly proved chain of custody of the incriminating exhibits was not established, the possibility of tampering, substitution or contamination could not be ruled out. Circumstances raised grave suspicion but the evidentiary requirement to sustain conviction under Section 376 was not met. Thus, the Court held that without any evidentiary sanctity, the appellant cannot be convicted on the basis of such evidence as conviction must rest on legally proved evidence and not suspicion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the case of Appellant 1, against whom CCTV footage was available, the forensic evidence unequivocally excluded him from the act of sexual assault, so the charges of rape or aggravated rape were not proved against him but the electronic evidence (CCTV) proved offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561680\" target=\"_blank\">361<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\">363<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> against him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further held that although the victim was found to be biologically major, but due to her condition was incapable of giving consent and the protection under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561680\" target=\"_blank\">361<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is not confined to minors alone but extends to persons who, by reason of mental unsoundness or intellectual disability, are incapable of safeguarding their own interests and remain under the care and protection of a guardian. Therefore, Appellant 2 was only found to be culpable for the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court asserted that &#8220;Criminal law mandates that a conviction must rest on legally proved evidence and not on suspicion, however strong.&#8221; The Court categorically held that &#8220;the circumstance of last seen&#8230; cannot substitute for proof of sexual assault.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Conclusively, Appellant 1&#8217;s conviction was modified and the Appellant 2 was acquitted of the charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mool Chandra@Moola v. The State of Uttarakhand, Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 2019, Decided on 12-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Ashish Naithani<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellants:<\/span> Mahavir Kohli, Asif Ali<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> J.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General for State<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;In the present case, the absence of documentary proof establishing the seizure and custody of the alleged forensic article creates a reasonable doubt as to the authorship of the sexual act.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":380816,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[77254,102210,36890,6711,39775,67301,102211,102208,55130,102209,13431],"class_list":["post-380815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ashish-naithani","tag-chain-of-custody","tag-crime-against-women-and-children","tag-criminal-law","tag-forensic-evidence","tag-j","tag-kidnapping-from-lawful-guardianship","tag-nainital-high-court","tag-person-of-unsound-mind","tag-ravindra-maithani","tag-section-376-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Nainital High Court examines chain of custody of forensic evidence |SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-13T04:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-15T10:16:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"Nainital High Court examines chain of custody of forensic evidence |SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-13T04:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-15T10:16:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"chain of custody of forensic evidence\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nainital High Court examines chain of custody of forensic evidence |SCC Times","description":"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence","og_description":"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-13T04:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-15T10:16:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/","name":"Nainital High Court examines chain of custody of forensic evidence |SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-13T04:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-15T10:16:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Nainital High Court finds infirmities in the chain of custody of forensic evidence and thus, holds it to be inconclusive regarding proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"chain of custody of forensic evidence"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/13\/nainital-high-court-examines-chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Conviction rests on evidence not suspicion: Uttaranchal High Court acquits accused on Sexual Assault charges due to anomalies in Chain of Custody of Forensic Evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/chain-of-custody-of-forensic-evidence.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/27\/5-high-courts-to-get-new-chief-justices\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":0},"title":"5 High Courts to get new Chief Justices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"KERALA HIGH COURT \u21aa Shri Justice Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti, Judge, Kerala High Court, appointed as the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT \u21aa\u00a0Shri Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Judge, Punjab & Haryana\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new chief justices of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/13\/uttaranchal-hc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-bnss-prevails-over-state-amendment-under-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Does S. 482 BNSS takes precedence over stricter State amendment to S. 438 CrPC?\u2019 Uttaranchal High Court refers matter to larger bench","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the Parliament enacts more liberal provisions, the benefit thereof should be available to all persons who may be affected, regardless of when their cases originated.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"BNSS prevails over State amendment under CrPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/BNSS-prevails-over-State-amendment-under-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/BNSS-prevails-over-State-amendment-under-CrPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/BNSS-prevails-over-State-amendment-under-CrPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/BNSS-prevails-over-State-amendment-under-CrPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/25\/custodial-statements-under-section-50-of-pmla-inadmissible-mp-high-court-grants-bail-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":2},"title":"Custodial statements under Section 50 PMLA are inadmissible; MP High Court grants bail","author":"Ritu","date":"November 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe arrest should be rational, fair and as per law and shall not be merely based upon guilt of accused established from inadmissible evidence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285273,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/25\/justice-sanjaya-kumar-mishra-appointment-chief-justice-jharkhand-high-court-legal-news-legal-updates-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra- The 14th Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Former Judge of Uttaranchal High Court, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra was recently elevated as the Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court. At his swearing-in ceremony, Justice Mishra stated that his priority will be to impart justice to the poor and downtrodden while expediting old cases.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-538.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-538.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-538.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-538.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/26\/rajasthan-high-court-section-65-b-certificate-evidence-act-original-device-holder\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":4},"title":"Who must submit the Section 65B Evidence Act certificate? Rajasthan HC reiterates requirements","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the video was recorded in someone\u2019s device and transferred to the device of the respondent who had submitted the certificate.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 65-B certificate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-65-B-certificate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-65-B-certificate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-65-B-certificate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Section-65-B-certificate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/court-cant-quash-trial-process-u-s-482-crpc-in-case-of-disputed-facts-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":380815,"position":5},"title":"High Courts cannot quash trial over disputed questions of facts: Allahabad High Court","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court in exercise of power under Section 482 of the CrPC cannot assume such jurisdiction and put an end to the process of trial provided under the law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"quash trial over disputed questions of facts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/quash-trial-over-disputed-questions-of-facts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380815"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380815\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381088,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380815\/revisions\/381088"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/380816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}