{"id":380731,"date":"2026-04-10T14:30:47","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T09:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=380731"},"modified":"2026-04-10T15:15:30","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T09:45:30","slug":"long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> Taking note of the long-standing claim of the aggrieved petitioner-respondent arising out of repeated rejection of her application for compassionate appointment on the ground of alleged ineligibility and non-recognition of her educational certificate, the Division Bench of M.S. Sonak, CJ., <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajesh Shankar, J.<\/span>, upheld the judgment by the Single Judge Bench directing the appellants to consider the claim of the writ petitioner for compassionate appointment.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case arose when the husband of the petitioner-respondent died in harness on 8 December 2011 while working at Jharkhand Government Press in the capacity of &#8220;Pratilipidhar&#8221;. The sudden financial crisis due to death of the breadwinner left the family in penury and without any means of livelihood. The petitioner-respondent applied for appointment on compassionate grounds on 6 July 2012. However, her claim was rejected by the Central Compassionate Committee on the ground that she was non-matriculate. The petitioner-respondent again applied for the same with the provisional certificate of passing &#8220;Praveshika&#8221; examination (equivalent to Matriculation) issued in 2013 from Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar, which again got rejected due to the difference on the date of birth in comparison to her admit card issued by the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna in 1996.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner-respondent again passed Praveshika examination from the same institute and applied for the same claim along with the passing certificate dated 21 March 2014 wherein her date of birth was consistent with the disputed document raised earlier by the appellants, however the same was again rejected. Subsequently, the date of birth mentioned in her provisional certificate issued with respect to the Praveshika examination, 2012 got verified and corrected by Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar. The petitioner-respondent applied for compassionate appointment again in 2020. It still got rejected stating that she was not eligible for appointment on compassionate ground as the degrees\/certificates issued by the Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar were derecognised w.e.f. 26 June 2014 and no appointment could be made based on any degree\/certificate issued by the Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Single Judge directed the appellant to consider the claim of the petitioner-respondent for compassionate appointment by putting reliance to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court passed on 7 January 2025, which held the degree issued by Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar valid up to 26 February 2015 and that the certificate of the petitioner was prior to the said date.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants present case was raised in the court of appeals through letters patent appeal against the order dated 7 January 2025 on the grounds of delay and latches as the order of rejection dated 15 June 2020 was challenged by the petitioner after a gap of four years without assigning any reason for such delay. It was also argued that since petitioner herself is a family pensioner to the family of the deceased employee on account of his death.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that on bare perusal of the record it is evident that the first application for appointment on compassionate ground was submitted by the petitioner-respondent on 6 July 2012, i.e. within one year from the date of death of her husband and thereafter she repeatedly made representations\/applications for grant of the same, however her request was turned down by the appellants, initially on the ground that she was non-matric and thereafter on the ground of dispute with respect to her date of birth recorded in the provisional certificate of &#8220;Praveshika&#8221; examination issued by Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar. The date of birth of the petitioner-respondent was subsequently rectified in her provisional certificate. Thus, the petitioner-respondent had not committed any delay in raising claim of compassionate appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court was of the view that since the claim of the compassionate appointment of the petitioner-respondent was rejected by an order dated 15 June 2020 by taking a ground that the degree issued by Hindi Vidyapeeth, Deoghar could not be treated as recognised even if the same was issued prior to 26 June 2014, the appellants cannot be allowed to raise a completely new ground to justify their action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An order which is bad in the beginning, cannot be validated by any additional ground brought out later. The appellants cannot be allowed to raise a completely new ground to justify their action.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> purpose of the scheme of compassionate appointment is to mitigate the hardship caused to the family of the employee on account of his unexpected death and to alleviate the distress of the family<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court after perusing the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Debabrata Tiwari<\/span>, (2025) 5 SCC 712, that where a long lapse of time has occurred since the date of death of the deceased employee, the sense of immediacy seeking compassionate appointment would cease to exist and thus lose its significance held that the facts and circumstance of the present case is quite different from the case cited by the appellants and as such the same is not applicable in the present case.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court for the reasons as aforesaid, upheld the order by the Single Judge Bench directing the appellants to consider the claim of the petitioner-respondent for compassionate appointment and dismissed the appeal as it did not find any infirmity in the impugned order dated 7 January 2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/compassionate-appointment-should-be-considered-in-hand-to-mouth-cases-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Compassionate appointment to be considered in &#8220;hand-to-mouth&#8221; cases where family struggles to pay basic expenses, if other conditions are satisfied: SC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Jharkhand<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kanchan Devi<\/span>, L.P.A. No. 605 of 2025, decided on 2-4-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Rajesh Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellants:<\/span>&nbsp;Indranil Bhaduri, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the&nbsp;Respondent:<\/span> Shubhashis Rasik Soren, Shobha Gloria Lakra, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An order which is bad in the beginning, cannot be validated by any additional ground brought out later. The appellants cannot be allowed to raise a completely new ground to justify their action.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":380742,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[5181,62886,102164,5791,102162,102165,102163],"class_list":["post-380731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compassionate-appointment","tag-delay-and-latches","tag-jharkhand-government-press","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-m-s-sonak-c-j","tag-pratilipidhar","tag-rajesh-shankar-j"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea Revived by Jharkhand HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-10T09:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-10T09:45:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea Revived by Jharkhand HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-10T09:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-10T09:45:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea Revived by Jharkhand HC| SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea","og_description":"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-10T09:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-10T09:45:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/","name":"Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea Revived by Jharkhand HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-10T09:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-10T09:45:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Jharkhand HC revived a long pending compassionate appointment plea, ruling that authorities cannot justify an invalid rejection by adding new grounds later.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/long-pending-compassionate-appointment-plea-jharkhand-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New Grounds Can\u2019t Save a Bad Order: Jharkhand HC directs fresh Consideration of Woman\u2019s Long Pending Compassionate Appointment Plea"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Long-Pending-Compassionate-Appointment-Plea.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/compassionate-appointment-cannot-be-denied-in-cases-of-deemed-or-civil-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":0},"title":"Compassionate appointment cannot be denied in cases of deemed or civil death","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of the respondent authorities, rejecting petitioner\u2019s claim for compassionate appointment on the ground that compassionate appointment cannot be granted in cases of deemed death or civil death. The main issue for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199622,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/authorities-cannot-reject-an-application-for-compassionate-appointment-on-new-ground-in-subsequent-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":1},"title":"Authorities cannot reject an application for compassionate appointment on new ground in subsequent proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of Respondent-authority whereby petitioner\u2019s claim for compassionate appointment after the death of his mother was rejected. The main issue, in this case, was whether the respondent authorities can come up with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/16\/jhc-directs-central-coalfields-ltd-constitute-medical-board-to-determine-age-of-man-seeking-compassionate-appointment-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":2},"title":"Jharkhand HC directs Central Coalfields Limited to constitute Medical Board to determine age of man seeking compassionate appointment on his father\u2019s death","author":"Arushi","date":"May 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The exclusion of one class of legitimate children from seeking compassionate appointment merely on the ground that the mother of the applicant was a plural wife of the deceased employee would fail to meet the test of a reasonable nexus with the objective sought to be achieved.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/stepson-not-being-a-valid-and-legal-dependant-is-not-entitled-to-compassionate-appointment-under-clause-9-3-3-of-the-national-coal-wage-agreement-vii\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":3},"title":"Stepson, not being a valid and legal dependant, is not entitled to compassionate appointment under Clause 9.3.3 of the National Coal Wage Agreement-VII","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of Aparesh Kumar Singh, J. while dealing with a civil writ petition rejected the petitioner\u2019s claim for compassionate appointment in place of his father\u2019s legally married wife. Facts of the case were that the petitioner\u2019s father \u2013 Laldo Turi \u2013 had two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":227172,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/17\/jhar-hc-in-case-of-two-circular-on-compassionate-appointment-the-one-released-later-should-be-used-as-a-reference-point-for-acceptance-or-rejection-subject-to-its-applicability\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | In case of two circular&#8217;s on compassionate appointment, the one released later should be used as a reference point for acceptance or rejection, subject to its applicability","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Dr S. N. Pathak J. allowed a writ petition and directed the respondents to consider the circular of a later date to be a reference point for rejection or otherwise, subject to its applicability, if any. The factual matrix of the case is that the father of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":191574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/21\/work-charge-employees-5-years-continuous-service-one-post-right-consideration-services-permanent-regular-establishment\/","url_meta":{"origin":380731,"position":5},"title":"Work-charge employees with more than 5 years of continuous service against one post have a right of consideration of their services in permanent (regular) establishment","author":"Saba","date":"February 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Jharkhand: The Single Judge Bench comprising of S.N.Pathak, J., recently addressed a petition wherein the petitioner prayed for the payment of her deceased husband\u2019s retiral benefits including gratuity and leave encashment, arising out of 23 years of service. The petitioner also prayed to the Court for directing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380731"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380745,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380731\/revisions\/380745"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/380742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}