{"id":380657,"date":"2026-04-10T09:00:49","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T03:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=380657"},"modified":"2026-04-09T19:46:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T14:16:22","slug":"second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by a Muslim man seeking quashing of criminal proceedings initiated against him by his first wife, the Single Judge Bench of B.P. Sharma, J., partly allowed the petition, holding that a second marriage contracted by a Muslim male would not be void under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) merely on the ground that the first marriage is still subsisting as Muslim personal law permits plurality of marriages.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 27 December 2002 as per Muslim rites and rituals. 20 years later, the complainant, i.e., the first wife of the petitioner, lodged a report stating that the petitioner was threatening her life, asking her to divorce him by Khula since she could not bear a child. She also alleged that her husband used to assault and defame her. On 4 May 2022, the petitioner pronounced divorce for the first time, and a few days later, he solemnised a second marriage. Thereafter, on 2 July 2022, he pronounced divorce for the second time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Based on the written report, a criminal case was registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561655\" target=\"_blank\">342<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506 Part II<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> against the husband at Mahila Police Station, Jabalpur. After completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur. The trial court framed charges against him under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561655\" target=\"_blank\">342<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506 Part II<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> via the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved, the husband filed the present petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804270\" target=\"_blank\">528<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNSS), seeking quashing of the impugned orders.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court clarified the limited scope of its inherent jurisdiction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519724\" target=\"_blank\">427<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) or Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804270\" target=\"_blank\">528<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a>. The Court stated that the said jurisdiction is required to be exercised sparingly and with great circumspection, only in cases where the allegations, even if taken at their face value, do not disclose the commission of any offence, or where continuation of the proceedings would amount to abuse of the process of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon perusal of the record, the Court noted that based on the divorce pronounced by the husband as per Muslim personal law, the Family Court, Jabalpur, vide judgment dated 14 November 2025, annulled the marriage between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, the Court stated that for the offence of bigamy to be attracted, it is essential that the second marriage must be void by reason of the subsistence of the earlier marriage. However, the applicability of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is subject to the personal law governing the parties. Under Muslim personal law, a Muslim male is permitted to have more than one wife at a time, subject to the conditions recognised by the personal law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In this regard, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sarla Mudgal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0oHJ496x\" target=\"_blank\">(1995) 3 SCC 635<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court noted that Muslim personal law recognises polygamy. Further, in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Khursheed Ahmad Khan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kS8kdVFQ\" target=\"_blank\">(2015) 8 SCC 439<\/a>, the Supreme Court again observed that Muslim law permits plurality of marriages, though it may be regulated by law in certain contexts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court held that in the present case, where the parties were governed by Muslim personal law, which permits a Muslim male to have more than one wife, even if the allegations of the first wife are accepted at face value, the husband&#8217;s act of contracting a second marriage would not satisfy the essential ingredients of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. Thus, continuation of the prosecution for the said offence would amount to an abuse of the process of the Court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;A second marriage contracted by a Muslim male during the lifetime of his first wife is not treated as void merely on the ground that the first marriage is still subsisting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, regarding the other offences alleged against the husband, the Court stated that the allegations and the material collected during the investigation prima facie disclosed the commission of those offences, and they were required to be examined by the trial court in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court partly allowed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohd. Arif Ahmad Jahagir Khan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9003362361\" target=\"_blank\">2026 SCC OnLine MP 3553<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Senior Advocate Anil Khare and Harjas Singh Chhabra<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Deputy Government Advocate Aatmaram Bain and Naveen Vaswani<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;A second marriage contracted by a Muslim male during the lifetime of his first wife is not treated as void merely on the ground that the first marriage is still subsisting.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":380672,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3594,93310,102114,30173,102116,102117,3167,102115,68358],"class_list":["post-380657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bigamy","tag-justice-b-p-sharma","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court-second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male","tag-muslim-personal-law","tag-plurality-of-marriages","tag-plurality-of-marriages-under-muslim-law","tag-polygamy","tag-polygamy-under-muslim-law","tag-s-494-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC: MP HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-10T03:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC: MP HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-10T03:30:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC: MP HC | SCC Times","description":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-10T03:30:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/","name":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC: MP HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-10T03:30:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male not void under S. 494 IPC as Muslim Personal Law permits plurality of marriages: Madhya Pradesh High Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Second marriage contracted by Muslim male"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/10\/second-marriage-contracted-by-muslim-male-not-void-under-s-494-ipc-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Second marriage by Muslim man not bigamy under Section 494 IPC, as Muslim Personal Law permits polygamy: Madhya Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Second-marriage-contracted-by-Muslim-male.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6699,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/03\/punishment-under-section-494-ipc-for-bigamy-is-applicable-on-all-citizens-whether-they-are-hindu-muslim-christian\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":0},"title":"Punishment under Section 494 IPC for bigamy is applicable on all citizens whether they are Hindu\/ Muslim\/Christian","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 3, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: On a petition filed by a public spirited person before this Court challenging that the provisions of Section 494 IPC are discriminatory on the ground of religion, a division bench of Ashok Bhushan and A.M. Shaffique JJ held that Section 494 IPC does not discriminate between Hindu\/\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347980,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/16\/bigamy-not-applicable-muslim-man-mohammedan-law-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":1},"title":"Bigamy not applicable to Muslim man under Mohammedan Law unless second marriage is void under Shariat: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court highlighted that the Quran permits polygamy for just and fair reasons, but in modern times, this provision is often misused for selfish purposes.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/10\/flashback-can-polygamy-be-an-integral-part-of-any-religion-read-allahabad-hcs-decision-on-finding-a-government-servant-being-guilty-of-bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":2},"title":"[Flashback] Can Polygamy be an integral part of any religion? Read Allahabad HC&#8217;s decision on finding a Government Servant being guilty of &#8216;Bigamy&#8217;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Sudhir Agarwal, J., found a government servant to be guilty of the offence of bigamy. The instant petition was filed against the decision passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Agra dismissing the petitioner from the post of Fireman and therefore mandamus was sought to direct respondent not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-29.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-29.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-29.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-29.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/image-29.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/22\/polygamous-cauldron-in-various-personal-laws-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":3},"title":"Polygamous cauldron in various personal laws in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr. Bibhabasu Misra*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Polygamy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Polygamy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Polygamy.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Polygamy.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Polygamy.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":79791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/law-for-laymen-s-494-ipc-bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":4},"title":"Bigamy [S. 494 IPC, S. 17 Hindu Marriage Act]","author":"SM","date":"October 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Image courtsey: Dick's Genealogy & History Corner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/bigamy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/bigamy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/bigamy.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/bigamy.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/bigamy.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/13\/allahabad-high-court-family-courts-act-1984-rocr-article-21-of-the-constitution-fundamental-rights-muslim-law-bigamy-dignity-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":380657,"position":5},"title":"Allahabad High Court | Muslim wife cannot be compelled by Court to live with her husband against her wishes while second marriage of the husband subsists","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 for setting aside the judgment dated 04.08.2022 and the decree dated 12.08.2022 by the Family Court, whereby the appellant's suit for restoration of conjugal rights, has been dismissed, the division bench of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380657"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380657\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380674,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380657\/revisions\/380674"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/380672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}