{"id":379969,"date":"2026-04-02T12:00:54","date_gmt":"2026-04-02T06:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=379969"},"modified":"2026-04-03T17:06:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T11:36:28","slug":"all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/","title":{"rendered":"No parole for arranging children\u2019s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court<\/span>: While considering a batch of writ petitions, a Division Bench of Rajesh Singh Chauhan and<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> *Rajeev Bharti, JJ.<\/span>, declined to grant parole to a life convict, holding that the urged grounds of medical condition, agricultural work, and arranging the marriage of his children did not justify temporary release under the U.P. (Suspension of Sentence of Prisoners) Rules, 2007 (2007 Rules). Noting that the petitioner was in good health, had alternative means available for agricultural activities, and that there exists no provision for parole on the ground of arranging a child&#8217;s marriage, the Court found no infirmity in the rejection orders passed by the competent authority.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> with a fine of Rs 20,000 by the Additional Sessions Judge. His criminal appeal was dismissed by this Court in March 2021, and the special leave to appeal filed before the Supreme Court was also dismissed in March 2022, thereby affirming the conviction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, in May 2025, the petitioner moved a representation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519730\" target=\"_blank\">432<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> seeking short term bail on the grounds of multiple ailments, old age and humanitarian considerations; however, the same was rejected by order dated 4 June2025. The petitioner challenged the said rejection. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted another representation dated 5 July 2025 seeking short term bail\/parole for the purpose of arranging the marriage of his son and daughter, which was also rejected by order dated 27 October 2025. Aggrieved by the rejection of the second representation, the petitioner filed the present petition before the Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court noted that the petitioner was in good health and, therefore, no substance was found in the claim seeking relief on medical grounds. However, the Court directed the jail authorities to take necessary steps considering his health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With regards to order dated 27 October 2025 rejecting the second representation, the Court noted that parole had been sought primarily on the grounds of completing agricultural work and arranging the marriage of the petitioner&#8217;s son and daughter. It was held that under Rule 3, 2007 Rules, there is no provision for grant of parole for arranging the marriage of a son or daughter, and thus the said ground was untenable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, with respect to the ground relating to agricultural work, the Court acknowledged that Rule 3(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">d<\/span>) permits parole for sowing or harvesting of crops where no alternative arrangement is available; however, in the present case, the petitioner had three adult sons, indicating the availability of alternative means, thereby rendering the contention devoid of merit. The Court further took note of Rule 1(4)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">c<\/span>), 2007 Rules, which excludes applicability in cases where other criminal proceedings are pending, and observed that the petitioner had a long criminal history, including convictions in two serious offences and nine pending criminal cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Placing reliance on the cautionary approach adopted by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asfaq<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hO39AO01\" target=\"_blank\">(2017) 15 SCC 55<\/a>, the Court held that the competent authority had duly considered all relevant factors while rejecting the request for parole. Consequently, the Court concluded that the case was not fit for grant of parole at this stage and dismissed the petitions accordingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Angad Yadav<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tqN7v6U1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine All 824<\/a>, decided on 19-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by: Justice Rajeev Bharti<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ayodhya Prasad Mishra A.P. Mishra, Rituraj Mishra, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> G.A.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8216;There is no provision for parole based on arranging the marriage of a son or daughter under the U.P. (Suspension of Sentence of Prisoners) Rules, 2007, Rule 3.&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67541,"featured_media":379973,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,101596,66409,3128,69551,101597],"class_list":["post-379969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-justice-rajeev-bharti","tag-justice-rajesh-singh-chauhan","tag-Parole","tag-parole-application","tag-u-p-suspension-of-sentence-of-prisoners-rules-2007"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No parole for arranging child&#039;s marriage or farm work if alternatives exist: All HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child&#039;s marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No parole for arranging children&#039;s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child&#039;s marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-02T06:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-03T11:36:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No parole for arranging children\u2019s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Malika Bhola\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/\",\"name\":\"No parole for arranging child's marriage or farm work if alternatives exist: All HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-02T06:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-03T11:36:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child's marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"no parole for arranging child's marriage\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No parole for arranging children\u2019s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1\",\"name\":\"Malika Bhola\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Malika Bhola\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/malika-bhola\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No parole for arranging child's marriage or farm work if alternatives exist: All HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child's marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No parole for arranging children's marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court","og_description":"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child's marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-02T06:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-03T11:36:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Malika Bhola","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No parole for arranging children\u2019s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Malika Bhola","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/","name":"No parole for arranging child's marriage or farm work if alternatives exist: All HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-02T06:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-03T11:36:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1"},"description":"Allahabad High Court held that parole cannot be granted for arranging a child's marriage or agricultural work where alternative means exist","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"no parole for arranging child's marriage"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/02\/all-hc-no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage-farm-work-if-alternatives-exist\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No parole for arranging children\u2019s marriage or agricultural work when alternative means exist: Allahabad High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/45db260c9b47eac21ba4813c9a379af1","name":"Malika Bhola","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ad40b34c562bedc415034fbcc0dc38433e5ef0c1f736b1961a9ebb53b5a3a65?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Malika Bhola"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/malika-bhola\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/no-parole-for-arranging-childs-marriage.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255897,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/furlough-not-a-legal-right-supreme-court-explains-difference-between-parole-and-furlough\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;Furlough not a legal right&#8217;: Supreme Court explains difference between Parole and furlough","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Although furlough can be claimed without a reason, the prisoner does not have an absolute legal right to claim furlough.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/pat-hc-prisoners-act-state-government-may-grant-parole-only-after-receiving-recommendation-from-the-district-parole-board\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Prisoners Act: State government may grant parole only after receiving recommendation from the District Parole Board","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Anjana Mishra, J. denied dismissed a petition filed for consideration of a parole application. Petitioner 1 and 2 herein, who were awarded life sentence after conviction in a criminal case, filed an application praying for their release on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/12\/including-parole-period-while-determining-14-years-actual-imprisonment-for-premature-release-may-lead-to-influential-persons-applying-for-multiple-paroles-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":2},"title":"Including parole period while determining 14 years&#8217; actual imprisonment for premature release may lead to influential persons applying for multiple paroles: SC","author":"Editor","date":"January 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme court has upheld a decision by the Bombay High Court that the period of parole should be excluded from the period of the sentence when considering 14 years of actual imprisonment for the purpose of premature release of convicts.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-67-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":192164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/23\/possibility-altercation-neighbours-cannot-equated-affecting-peace-tranquility-area\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":3},"title":"Possibility of altercation between neighbours cannot be equated with affecting \u2018peace and tranquility of the area\u2019","author":"Saba","date":"February 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A murder convict was released on parole to attend the marriage of his daughter, by a Division Bench comprising of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Dinesh Kumar Singh, JJ. The petitioner who was convicted under Sections 302, 307, etc. of IPC was sentenced for life imprisonment. He applied\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217506,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/31\/collegium-resolution-16-additional-judges-of-allahabad-hc-recommended-to-be-permanent-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":4},"title":"Collegium Resolution | 16 Additional Judges of Allahabad HC recommended to be Permanent Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for appointment of following 19 Additional Judges of the Allahabad High Court, as Permanent Judges of that High Court: 1. Justice Rajiv Joshi 2. Justice Rahul Chaturvedi 3. Justice Salil Kumar Rai 4. Justice Jayant Banerji 5. Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan 6. Justice Irshad Ali 7. Justice Saral Srivastava\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/27\/covid-19-parole-ends-prisoners-return-to-jail-overcrowded-prisons-undertrial-convicts-supreme-court-pandemic-legal-updates-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":379969,"position":5},"title":"COVID-19 Parole ends; Undertrial Prisoners\/Convicts to return to prisons as Supreme Court directs them to surrender","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the undertrial prisoners\/convicts were not released on merits but were released only to prevent the spread of COVID-19 virus among prisoners in over-crowded prisons.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"COVID Parole","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-873.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-873.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-873.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-873.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67541"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=379969"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379969\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380148,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379969\/revisions\/380148"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/379973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=379969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=379969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=379969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}