{"id":379818,"date":"2026-03-31T15:30:41","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T10:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=379818"},"modified":"2026-04-07T17:25:47","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T11:55:47","slug":"bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed at Nagpur Bench, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Nandesh S. Deshpande<\/span>* and M.S.Jawalkar, JJ., held that the Maharashtra government&#8217;s decision to exclude &#8216;Body Building&#8217; from the list of eligible sports for the purpose of granting 5% reservation in appointment of Group (A) &amp; (B) posts in government\/semi-government institutions, under 2016 Government Resolution, even though the sport was eligible under the 2005 and 2013 Resolutions, was violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a> as it was done arbitrarily and not based on intelligible differentia. The Court held that the basis of legitimate expectation, the action violated the right of the petitioner to claim reservation and the action had no nexus to the aim and object of the policy.<\/p>\n<h3>Background and Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Government Resolution in 2005 reserved 5% of the posts in Class &#8216;A&#8217; to &#8216;D&#8217; of the Government and Semi Government institutions under sports quota where game of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;Body Building&#8217;<\/span> was eligible for reservation. By 2016, the rule changed the eligibility criteria to include the player of State of Maharashtra who secured First\/Second\/Third rank or Gold\/Silver\/Bronze medal while representing their university in All India Inter Universities Sports Meet, to be organized by Inter Universities Sports Board as referred to in the respective Government Resolution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Various games\/sports eligible for appointment of Group (A) &amp; (B) posts were mentioned in the Government Resolution. A note mentioned that only those games which are held in Olympics, Asiad and Commonwealth games along with Chess, Kabaddi and Kho-Kho would be included in the said eligibility to avail the reservation. Against this exact note the present writ petition was filed, contending that the action of the State in limiting the games only to those which are held in the said competitions was absolutely bad-in-law and showed colourable exercise of power. The 2005 Resolution had &#8216;Body Building&#8217; as an eligible sport whereas in 2016 Resolution, apart from Olympics, Asiad and Commonwealth games, a special class of games was included where Chess, Kabaddi, Kho-Kho and eventually Mallakhamb found place. It was argued that not including &#8216;Body-Building&#8217; here was not based on intelligible differentia and had no nexus with the policy and the object to be achieved. Moreover, the action was violative of Article 14.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the other hand, the respondents submitted that the action, being a policy matter, was out of the scope of judicial review, unless ex facie arbitrary, and that there was no legally enforceable right based upon the principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation in respect of the policy framed in 2005.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue raised<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether a legally enforceable right can be claimed based upon the principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation in respect of the policy framed under the Government Resolution dated 30\/4\/2005, which has been superseded by the Government Resolution dated 1\/7\/2016?<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After referring to multiple judgements, the Court held that the doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be claimed as a right in itself but can be used only when the denial of a legitimate expectation leads to the violation of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Court referred to the Preamble of the 2005 Resolution to ascertain the aim and object of the policy which was similar in subsequent resolutions too and observed that even the games which did not fulfill the criteria were included by the Government subsequently. The Court held that inclusion of few Indian games and non-inclusion of the game of &#8216;Body Building&#8217; affected the fundamental rights of the petitioner. The Court agreed with the petitioner that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;The <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">basis of classification and limiting the games to Olympics, Asiad and Commonwealth Games is not based on any intelligible differentia and does not have any nexus with the object of the said policy<\/span>, which is to encourage students to participate in sports activities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Court found that as the Central Government acknowledged &#8216;Body Building&#8217; as a legitimate and recognized sport by conferring Arjuna Award in the field, the exclusion by State Authorities, for the purpose of reservations was<span style=\"color: #222222;\"> inconsistent, arbitrary, and devoid of reasonable justification. Referring to the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">principle of law of class legislation<\/span>, where<\/span> by conferring particular privileges upon a class of persons, arbitrarily selected from a large number of persons all of whom stand in the same relation to the privilege granted, and those on whom the privileges conferred and the persons not so favored, are discriminated, <span style=\"color: #222222;\">the Court finally held that<\/span> the petitioner had a legitimate expectation that he would secure job if he is qualified as per the said policy and has dedicated his precious years of life in it. Thus, the action of the State in excluding the game but at the same time adding some games without any rationale or logic behind it, has led to arbitrariness resulting in violation of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>. Therefore, the Court held that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;Body Building&#8221; is a species of Gymnastics and is eligible for 5% reservation in Government and semi-Government Class &#8216;A&#8217; to &#8216;D&#8217; posts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Deepak Asaram Pawar v State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fw8p3jsm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Bom 2351<\/a>, decided on 13-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-indent: 18pt; border: 2px solid black; border-radius: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: #DCDCDC;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by: Justice Nandesh S. Deshpande<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioners:<\/span> Petitioner in person<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> N.R.Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, V.V.Dahat, J.B.Kasat<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Bombay High Court held that as &#8216;Body Building&#8217; had state recognition earlier and is nationally recognized, its exclusion violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":379819,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[101489,101490,2569,94337,33519,101491,32386,101488],"class_list":["post-379818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-5-reservation-for-body-building","tag-5-reservation-in-government-posts-under-sports-quota","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-justice-nandesh-s-deshpande","tag-legitimate-expectation","tag-maharashtra-state-policy","tag-promissory-estoppel","tag-reservation-under-sports-quota"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Body Building Eligible for Reservation in Government Posts: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court holds &#039;Body Building&#039; eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court holds &#039;Body Building&#039; eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-31T10:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-07T11:55:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/\",\"name\":\"Body Building Eligible for Reservation in Government Posts: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-31T10:00:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-07T11:55:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court holds 'Body Building' eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"body building eligible for reservation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Body Building Eligible for Reservation in Government Posts: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court holds 'Body Building' eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation","og_description":"Bombay High Court holds 'Body Building' eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-31T10:00:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-07T11:55:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","name":"Body Building Eligible for Reservation in Government Posts: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-31T10:00:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-07T11:55:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay High Court holds 'Body Building' eligible for 5% reservations in the Maharashtra government and semi government class A to D posts","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"body building eligible for reservation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/28\/maharashtra-govt-files-caveat-in-sc-anticipating-challenge-to-bombay-hcs-maratha-quota-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":0},"title":"Maharashtra Govt files caveat in SC anticipating challenge to Bombay HC&#8217;s Maratha Quota verdict","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Maharashtra government has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court anticipating challenge to the verdict passed by the Bombay High Court which upheld the constitutional validity of reservation for Maratha community in education and government jobs in the state. In its plea, the Maharashtra government said no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225226,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/maharashtra-reservation-sc-to-begin-final-hearing-in-maratha-quota-issue-from-march-17\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":1},"title":"Maharashtra reservation| SC to begin final hearing in Maratha Quota issue from March 17","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Court will start from March 17 the final hearing on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a Maharashtra law, which grants reservation to the Maratha community in education and jobs. A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Deepak Gupta refused to pass an interim order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/breaking-bombay-hc-upholds-16-maratha-reservation-given-by-maharashtra-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":2},"title":"Breaking | Bombay HC upholds Maratha Reservation given by Maharashtra Government!","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, the Division Bench of the High Court has upheld the Maratha Reservation for educational institutions and appointments to posts in public services as provided by the Maharashtra Government but says \"16% is not justifiable\". A petition had challenged its constitutional validity. The Judgment was reserved after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/25\/maratha-quota-in-maharashtra-put-on-hold\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":3},"title":"Maratha Quota in Maharashtra put on hold","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 25, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In an interim order, a bench comprising of MS Shah, CJ and MS Sonak, J stayed the ordinance to provide 16% reservation to the Maratha community in government jobs and educational institutions in Maharashtra. The Court also stayed the 5% quota for Muslims in government jobs but\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":4},"title":"P&#038;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of writ jurisdiction, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the State Government\u2019s action taking a policy decision to prescribe a particular percentage of reservation\/quota for a particular category of persons, cannot be interfered with by issuance of a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240993,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/bombay-hc-allows-benefit-of-ews-quota-to-student-from-maratha-caste-albeit-a-rider\/","url_meta":{"origin":379818,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC allows benefit of EWS quota to student from Maratha caste albeit a rider","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., directed that the petitioner, belonging to the Maratha caste, be considered for providing the benefit of EWS quota albeit a rider. In the instant petition, the petitioners stated that they belong to the 'Maratha Caste' and have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=379818"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":380351,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379818\/revisions\/380351"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/379819"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=379818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=379818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=379818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}