{"id":37901,"date":"2016-03-02T11:10:52","date_gmt":"2016-03-02T05:40:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=37901"},"modified":"2016-03-28T18:31:00","modified_gmt":"2016-03-28T13:01:00","slug":"high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi<\/strong><strong> High Court: <\/strong>Much to the disappointment of the Telcos, a Division Bench of Rohini C.J. and Jayant Nath J. upheld the controversial regulation issued by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India that imposes pecuniary liability upon all the Indian telecommunication companies to compensate the customers for the call drops faced by them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appearing collectively as the Cellular Operators Association of India, the petitioner companies represented by Harish Salve and Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued against the validity of the Consumer Protection (Ninth Amendment) Regulations, 2015 stating that it was <em>ultra vires <\/em>the ambit of Section 36 of the principal Act, which confers TRAI with the power of making regulations. Also invoking the doctrine of occupied field, the petitioners argued that the issue of call drops had already been taken care of by Quality of Service Regulations and hence both regulations were mutually contradictory\/destructive. Calling the Ninth Amendment Regulations arbitrary and unreasonable, the petitioners claimed that the regulations have come to levying penalty without ascertaining the reason for call drops. To the contrary, TRAI represented by P.S. Narasimha (ASG) strongly averred for TRAI\u2019s statutory power to issue the Ninth Amendment Regulations citing its statutory responsibility to protect consumers\u2019 interest. The respondent further contested against the application of doctrine of occupied field by discerning the difference in objectives of both the regulations. Also dismissing the contention of arbitrariness raised by the petitioners, the respondent showed more than 400 drive tests conducted prior to issuing the Ninth Amendment Regulations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Concluding that TRAI was well within its powers to issue the Regulations, the Court observed that the Regulations were neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. Also, noting the reliability of the Technical Paper developed by TRAI before issuing the Regulations, Court remained convinced that it was possible to implement the Regulations in all propriety. Agreeing with the contention raised by the respondent, the Bench discarded the applicability of the doctrine of occupied field and upheld the Regulations in their entirety with its pre-scheduled date for compliance. [<em>Cellular Operators Association of India v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Del_1388\">2016 SCC OnLine Del 1388<\/a>\u00a0decided on 29\/02\/2016]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To read the Judgment, click <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_Del_1388\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Much to the disappointment of the Telcos, a Division Bench of Rohini C.J. and Jayant Nath J. upheld the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Much to the disappointment of the Telcos, a Division Bench of Rohini C.J. and Jayant Nath J. upheld the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-02T05:40:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-28T13:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/\",\"name\":\"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-02T05:40:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-28T13:01:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Much to the disappointment of the Telcos, a Division Bench of Rohini C.J. and Jayant Nath J. upheld the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-03-02T05:40:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-28T13:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/","name":"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-02T05:40:52+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-28T13:01:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/02\/high-court-upholds-the-regulation-for-compensating-call-drops\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court upholds the Regulation for Compensating Call Drops"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":47431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/16\/call-drop-charges-as-penalty-on-the-telecom-service-providers-violative-of-arts-14-and-191g-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":0},"title":"Call drop charges as penalty on the telecom Service providers violative of Arts. 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the validity of the Telecom Consumers Protection (Ninth Amendment) Regulations, 2015 was in question, the Court held that the Impugned Regulation is ultra vires the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (TRAI Act) and violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6400,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/14\/conflict-of-interest-petition-against-n-srinivasan-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":1},"title":"Conflict of Interest Petition against N. Srinivasan dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 14, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a recent order, a bench comprising of Anoop Mohta and NM Jamdar, JJ dismissed a PIL filed by the Cricket Association of Bihar, challenging the two amendments carried out by the Board of Control for Cricket for India, in its rules and regulations which they claimed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/delhi-high-court-upholds-increase-pan-masala-warning-label-size-enhance-public-health-awareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":2},"title":"[Food Safety and Standards Amendment] Delhi High Court upholds 50% Increase in Pan Masala Warning Label Size to Enhance Public Health Awareness","author":"Arunima","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petition was filed by a company licensed to manufacture and trade Pan Masala brands like Rajnigandha, Tansen, and Mastaba seeking a declaration that Regulation 2(i) of Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Second Amendment Regulations, 2022 be declared as illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/article-348-discrepancy-between-english-and-hindi-versions-of-a-regulation-english-version-will-prevail-mp-hc-upholds-candidature-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":3},"title":"Article 348 | \u2018In case of discrepancy between English and Hindi versions of a Regulation, English version prevails\u2019: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs per Article 348(1)(b)(iii) of the Constitution of India, the authoritative texts of all orders, rules, Regulations and bye-laws issued under the Constitution or under any law made by Parliament or the Legislature of a State, shall be in the English language.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/rbi-notifies-the-credit-information-companies-amendment-regulations-2017\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":4},"title":"RBI notifies the Credit Information Companies (Amendment) Regulations, 2017","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"No. BBR.CID. No. 786\/20.16.050\/2017-18.\u2014In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 37 of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 (Act 30 of 2005), the Reserve Bank of India hereby makes the following regulations, to amend the Credit Information Companies Regulations, 2006. 1. Short title and commencement: (1) These regulations\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Foreign Legislation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":112511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/06\/angel-funds-allowed-to-invest-in-securities-of-overseas-companies-subject-to-rbi-guidelines\/","url_meta":{"origin":37901,"position":5},"title":"Angel Funds allowed to invest in securities of overseas companies subject to RBI guidelines","author":"Saba","date":"March 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"No. SEBI\/LAD-NRO\/GN\/2016-17\/026.\u2014 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 30 read with sub-section (1) of Section 11, clause (ba) and clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 11 and sub-sections (1) and (1B) of Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37901\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}