{"id":378964,"date":"2026-03-20T16:30:12","date_gmt":"2026-03-20T11:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=378964"},"modified":"2026-03-20T16:44:18","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T11:14:18","slug":"madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","title":{"rendered":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In an application filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused persons, who were manufacturing fake products using applicant’s trade mark and copyrights, the Single Judge Bench of Rajesh Kumar Gupta<\/span>, J.<\/span>, held that the Sessions Court granted bail on the presumption that the all the offences were punishable maximum upto the imprisonment of 7 years and therefore, wrongly applied the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar<\/span> v. State of Bihar<\/span>, (2014) 8 SCC 273<\/a>; application was allowed and impugned orders were quashed.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

Applicant, proprietor of trade mark “Bhatia Masale”, filed a complaint against Respondents 2 to 5, for selling fake products bearing his trade mark and copyrights “Bhatia Masale”.<\/p>\n

An FIR was registered for offence punishable under Sections 420<\/a>, Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), and Section 63<\/a>, Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>. During investigation, the offence was admitted and the material used for manufacturing fake products were seized. The charge-sheet was filed enhancing the offence under Sections 120-B<\/a>, 201<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Sections 102<\/a>, 103<\/a> and 104<\/a>, Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>.<\/p>\n

At the time of filing of the charge-sheet, the accused persons filed a bail application. Accordingly, JMFC Court released them on bail bonds, considering that all the offences were punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years. Thereafter, the JMFC Court, after perusing the charge-sheet, took cognizance of additional offences under Sections 467<\/a>, 468<\/a>, 469<\/a>, 470<\/a>, 471<\/a> and 473<\/a> IPC<\/a>. The JMFC Court also cancelled the bail bonds, since they were not obtained for additional offences under aforesaid sections. The JMFC Court sent the matter to the Sessions Court for the committal of the case, since the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 473 were exclusively triable by the Sessions Court.<\/p>\n

The accused persons filed applications for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court, for additional offences, and the same were allowed. The Sessions Court relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Arnesh Kumar<\/span> (supra), while observing that offences are punishable up to the imprisonment of 7 years. However, offences under Sections 467<\/a>, 468<\/a>, 469<\/a>, 470<\/a>, 471<\/a> and 473<\/a> IPC<\/a> were ignored without any reasoning.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved, the applicant filed the instant application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail to the private Respondents 2 to 5.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

At the outset, the Court referred the judgment of the Supreme Court in Pradeep Ram<\/span> v. State of Jharkhand<\/span>, (2019) 17 SCC 326<\/a>. Wherein it was held that, where an accused has been granted bail, the investigating authority cannot arrest the accused solely on account of the addition of new offence(s). Any such arrest requires prior permission from the Court that granted bail.<\/p>\n

The Court then distinguished the facts and circumstances of the present case and noted that the JMFC Court had already taken cognizance of additional offences, punishable with life imprisonment, prior to the passing of impugned orders.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the Sessions Court undoubtedly had jurisdiction to grant the bail to the accused persons. However, the Sessions Court erred in grating the bail in light of the Arnesh Kumar<\/span> (supra), while ignoring additional offences punishable with imprisonment more than 7 years. The grant of bail on the presumption that the all the offences are punishable maximum upto the imprisonment of 7 years led to the gross error by the Sessions Court.<\/p>\n

Hence, the grant of anticipatory bail was untenable in law.<\/p>\n

The Court, hence, allowed the instant application by quashing impugned orders and directed accused-respondents to approach the trial court for regular bail while directing the trial court to consider and decide such applications independently, without being influenced by any observations contained in this order.<\/p>\n

[Rajkumar Bhatia<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine MP 10641<\/a>, order dated 17-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the applicant:<\/span> Karan Virwani, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent 1:<\/span> Jyoti Gautam, PL for the State<\/p>\n

For the Respondent 2:<\/span> Prashant Sharma, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent 3 and 4:<\/span> Girija Shankar Sharma, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent 5:<\/span> N\/A<\/p>\n

Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"trade<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Madhya Pradesh High Court examined whether anticipatory bail could stand when additional, more serious offences had already been taken cognizance of by the Magistrate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":378980,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[100950,13011,2664,9271,100952,100951,46455,87094,9291,7201,21614,2616],"class_list":["post-378964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-addition-of-offences","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-Bail","tag-copyright","tag-counterfeits","tag-enhancement-of-offences","tag-fake-products","tag-justice-rajesh-kumar-gupta","tag-life-imprisonment","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-sessions-court","tag-Trade_Mark"],"yoast_head":"\nMadhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-20T11:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-20T11:14:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/\",\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-20T11:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-20T11:14:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"cancellation of anticipatory bail\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail | SCC Times","description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-20T11:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-20T11:14:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/","name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-20T11:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-20T11:14:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court ruling on cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without considering enhanced offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years, including offences carrying life imprisonment","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"cancellation of anticipatory bail"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/madhya-pradesh-hc-ruling-on-cancellation-of-bail-granted-in-ignorance-of-additional-offences\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC quashed anticipatory bail of brand counterfeiting case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cancellation-of-anticipatory-bail.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":242545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/22\/lower-courts-are-in-so-much-pressure-that-they-do-not-give-bail-even-in-ordinary-offences-says-justice-atul-sreedharan-in-can-webinar\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":0},"title":"\u201cLower Courts are in so much Pressure that they do not give Bail even in Ordinary offences” says Justice Atul Sreedharan in CAN Webinar","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Confederation of Alumni for National Law Universities (CAN Foundation) & Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow (RMLNLU) hosted a webinar on \u201cBail & Jail: The Rule & The Exception\u201d. The Panelists were HMJ Siddharth Mridul, Judge, Delhi High Court; HMJ Atul Sreedharan, Judge, Madhya Pradesh High Court,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Conference\/Seminars\/Lectures"","block_context":{"text":"Conference\/Seminars\/Lectures","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/conference_seminars_lectures\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/CAN-Webinar-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/CAN-Webinar-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/CAN-Webinar-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/CAN-Webinar-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/CAN-Webinar-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356447,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/12\/mp-hc-recalls-incorrect-order-wherein-accused-was-accidentally-granted-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":1},"title":"Madhya Pradesh HC recalls incorrect order wherein accused was \u2018accidentally\u2019 granted bail","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court had granted bail to the accused whose bail had to be denied due to a typographical error.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"accidently granted bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/accidently-granted-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/accidently-granted-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/accidently-granted-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/accidently-granted-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277792,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/allahabad-high-court-anticipatory-bail-is-a-statutory-right-not-a-constitutional-right-successive-anticipatory-bail-application-not-maintainable-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court| Anticipatory bail is a statutory right not a Constitutional right; Successive anticipatory bail application not maintainable","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad high Court: In a second anticipatory bail application for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) and 3 or 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO Act\u2019), Suresh Kumar Gupta, J. said that Section 439 Code of Criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/hp-hc-court-discusses-legal-position-of-anticipatory-bail-in-cases-where-accused-is-a-proclaimed-offender-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Court discusses legal position of anticipatory bail in cases where accused is a \u2018proclaimed offender\u2019; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Anoop Chitkara J., considering the peculiar facts of the present case, allows anticipatory bail to a proclaimed offender, imposing several conditions. \u00a0Brief Facts On the allegations made by a girl, aged 15 years, against the petitioner of having coitus with her at the end of May\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/14\/woman-accused-anticipatory-bail-bigamy-supreme-court-legal-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to a woman accused of Bigamy","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The woman has alleged that she has been falsely implicated in a case of bigamy and cheating, on the basis of a clerical mistake committed by the Bank agent who mistakenly entered the name of her business partner as her husband and Nominee.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-20.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":268260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/11\/does-a-high-court-have-the-jurisdiction-to-grant-anticipatory-bail-in-a-case-that-has-been-registered-beyond-its-local-limits-jk-and-ladakh-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":378964,"position":5},"title":"Does a High Court have the jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail in a case that has been registered beyond its local limits? J&K and Ladakh HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While considering an anticipatory bail application concerning an FIR registered in Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh; the Bench of Sanjay Dhar, J., deliberated on the issue that whether this High Court, under S. 438, CrPC, has the jurisdiction to grant bail in a case that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378964\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/378980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}