{"id":378711,"date":"2026-03-18T12:00:02","date_gmt":"2026-03-18T06:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=378711"},"modified":"2026-03-20T09:51:43","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T04:21:43","slug":"vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging the discontinuance of service of an ad hoc employee of the Vaishno Devi Shrine Board (Shrine Board) and assailing Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002050105\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002050306\" target=\"_blank\">J&amp;K Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1988<\/a> (1988 Act), a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Dhar<\/span>, J. held that the action lacked any public law element and the petitioner&#8217;s claim arose purely from a private contractual engagement. The Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable and observed that the Shrine Board was not &#8220;State&#8221; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574842\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, despite having a statutory status, as it lacked government control.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was appointed as a Pujari on 27 September 1986 on a consolidated salary. By the impugned order dated 30 June 1988, his services were discontinued without any fault on his part. According to him, he was given to understand that the employment was permanent, and he performed his duties with devotion and honesty. He had several dependents to look after. It was stated that no enquiry was held by the respondents before dispensing with his services. He alleged violation of Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574893\" target=\"_blank\">16<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575127\" target=\"_blank\">311<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and submitted that his services could not be terminated without adopting procedure prescribed under law. He stated that he was appointed against a clear vacancy which was still existing and that new posts created in May 1988 were filled by others while he was thrown out. He further contended that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002050105\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002050306\" target=\"_blank\">1988 Act<\/a> was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ultra vires<\/span> being violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> as it conferred vague and unbridled powers on the State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the respondents contended that his engagement was purely ad hoc and conferred no right on him to hold the post. The protection under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575127\" target=\"_blank\">311<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> was inapplicable as the Shrine Board was an autonomous body and not the Government. The respondents denied having assured permanency to the petitioner and asserted that no enquiry was required in view of the nature of the impugned order. They also defended the validity of the 1988 Act.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the matter was initially decided by a judgment dated 22 July 1998 and the petitioner&#8217;s disengagement was set aside with a direction to reinstate him without back wages. This was challenged by the respondents and eventually the Supreme Court remanded the matter back to the Court for its fresh decision in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Omkar Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1wA8fZRA\" target=\"_blank\">2005 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 112<\/a>, wherein while applying the principles of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pradeep Kumar Biswas<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Indian Institute of Chemical Biology<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XMh3wPmt\" target=\"_blank\">(2002) 5 SCC 111<\/a>, it was observed that:<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;even though the Shrine Board has been constituted under a statute and, therefore, has a statutory status, in the absence of any kind &#8212; even an iota of control of the Government &#8212; financial, functional or administrative &#8212; it cannot be said to be State or an authority within the meaning of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574842\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. It has, therefore, to be held that the writ petitions for enforcement of fundamental rights against the Shrine Board are not maintainable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that at present the legal position is that writ petitions against the Shrine Board seeking enforcement of fundamental rights are not maintainable. However, the Court emphasised that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> is wide enough and the High Court while exercising its powers under the said article is vested with the jurisdiction to issue writs even against those bodies, who do not qualify to be &#8220;State&#8221; within the meaning of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574842\" target=\"_blank\">12<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">BCCI<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cricket Assn. of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vU44pqc8\" target=\"_blank\">(2015) 3 SCC 251<\/a>, wherein it was held that the words &#8220;any person or authority&#8221; in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> not only include the statutory authorities and instrumentalities of the State but also any person or authority performing public duties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the issue of maintainability of a writ petition against a body not qualifying as &#8220;State&#8221;, the Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.R. Rudani<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NFbg5u13\" target=\"_blank\">(1989) 2 SCC 691<\/a>, and observed that in a case where the rights sought to be enforced are purely of a private character, the writ petition would not lie. Thus, the guiding factor is the nature of duty imposed upon the person or body against whom a writ is being sought. If the nature of duty imposed on a body is public in nature, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> but if the rights sought to be enforced are purely of a private character, a writ cannot be issued against such body. The Court also referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Binny Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Sadasivan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2PVItH0r\" target=\"_blank\">(2005) 6 SCC 657<\/a>, wherein it was observed that there must be a public law element involved for a writ to be issued, and the High Court cannot exercise judicial review of an action to enforce purely private contracts entered into between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the petitioner was challenging his termination from service which did not reflect any public element. Rather, the Court noted that he was seeking the enforcement of his rights under a contract of service executed by him with the Shrine Board, which was purely private in character. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Showkat Ahmad Rather<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (UT of J&amp;K)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nK9Jj51z\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 837<\/a>, wherein it was observed that in absence of violation of statutory provision or breach of public duty by a body or person, writ petition for enforcement of a private contract of service is not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On merits, the Court highlighted that the disengagement order revealed that the petitioner was terminated along with two more employees as their services were no more required by the Shrine Board and opined that the order did not cast stigma and was not punitive. The Court noted that the engagement was purely on ad hoc basis and observed that an ad hoc appointee has no vested right to the post against which he is appointed. The employment of an ad hoc appointee ends the moment the purpose or term for which such an employee is hired comes to an end.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since the petitioner&#8217;s services were no longer required, the Court held that he had no right to seek continuation or reinstatement. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that it was not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Subash Raina<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (UT of J&amp;K)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0vfy4s8Q\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine J&#038;K 186<\/a>, decided on 12-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Harpreet Singh, Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Atul Verma, vice Adarsh Sharma, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The guiding factor is the nature of duty imposed upon the person or body against whom a writ is being sought. If the nature of duty imposed on a body is public in nature, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution but if the rights sought to be enforced are purely of a private character, a writ cannot be issued against such body.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":378719,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26204,81598,55056,8561,64292,55664,72683,2729,100766,24674,100764,98272],"class_list":["post-378711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-hoc-appointment","tag-article-12-constitution","tag-article-226-constitution","tag-back-wages","tag-disengagement","tag-jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court","tag-justice-sanjay-dhar","tag-Reinstatement","tag-section-142-jk-shri-mata-vaishno-devi-shrine-act-1988","tag-state","tag-vaishno-devi-shrine-board","tag-writ-maintainability"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC:Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not &#039;State&#039; under Art. 12 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not &#039;State&#039; under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-18T06:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-20T04:21:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC:Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not 'State' under Art. 12 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-18T06:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-20T04:21:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not 'State' under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"vaishno devi shrine board not State\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC:Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not 'State' under Art. 12 | SCC Times","description":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not 'State' under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&K and Ladakh HC","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not 'State' under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-18T06:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-20T04:21:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/","name":"J&K HC:Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not 'State' under Art. 12 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-18T06:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-20T04:21:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observes that Vaishno Devi Shrine Board is not 'State' under Article 12 despite statutory status as it lacks governmental control.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"vaishno devi shrine board not State"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-state-article-12-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vaishno Devi Shrine Board not \u201cState\u201d under Art. 12 Despite Statutory Status; Lacks Governmental Control: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/vaishno-devi-shrine-board-not-State.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":199402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/shri-mata-vaishno-devi-ji-shrine-rehabilitation-plan-of-mule-owners-to-be-considered-in-totality-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":0},"title":"Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine | Rehabilitation plan of mule owners to be considered in totality: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of Madan B.Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ, addressed the matter in regard to the rehabilitation plan of mule owners on the track between Katra and Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine which was prepared 10 months back, but no action has yet been taken. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":176784,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/18\/ngt-temples-directed-preserve-environment\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":1},"title":"NGT: Temples directed to preserve the environment","author":"Saba","date":"December 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Green Tribunal, New Delhi: The Bench comprising of Swatanter Kumar (Chairperson), U.D. Salvi (Judicial member) and Dr. Nagin Nanda (Expert member) passed the order with certain directions to the Amarnath Ji Shrine Board and Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board, to maintain the environment by following certain orders, to curb\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297988,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/know-thy-judge-chief-justice-telangana-high-court-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Judge| Justice Alok Aradhe: 6th Chief Justice of Telangana High Court","author":"Arunima","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Alok Aradhe was sworn in as Chief Justice of Telangana High Court on 23-07-2023 by the Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan. He succeeded Justice Ujjal Bhuyan who has been elevated as a Judge in the Supreme Court of India. Justice Aradhe has formerly served as Judge in Karnataka, Jammu and Kashmir\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice alok aradhe","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/24\/jammu-kashmir-ladakh-hc-directed-repatriation-of-63-year-pakistani-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":3},"title":"Jammu &amp; Kasmir &amp; Ladakh HC orders return of 63-year-old woman deported to Pakistan after Pahalgam terror attack","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHuman rights are the most sacrosanct component of a human life and, therefore, there are occasions when a constitutional court is supposed to come up with SOS like indulgence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/28\/cji-b-r-gavai-speaks-at-nalsa-north-zone-conference-bats-for-women-led-legal-transformation\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":4},"title":"\u201cWomen empowerment remains a cornerstone of stronger, more inclusive justice delivery system\u201d: CJI B.R. Gavai speaks at NALSA\u2019s North Zone Conference 2025","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and Supreme Court Judges emphasized on bar-bench unity and women-led legal transformation at NALSA\u2019s North Zone Conference, Srinagar.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"women-led legal transformation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/women-led-legal-transformation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/women-led-legal-transformation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/women-led-legal-transformation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/women-led-legal-transformation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":232410,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/17\/j-shrine-board-to-take-decision-urgently\/","url_meta":{"origin":378711,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Amarnath Shrine Board to decide on the cancellation of Amarnath Yatra; Shrine Board to take decision urgently","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Gita Mittal, CJ, and Sanjay Dhar, J., refused to entertain an application which sought the cancellation of the annual Amarnath Yatra this year due to the Coronavirus pandemic, leaving the matter to be decided by Amarnath Shrine Board. The present application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378711\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/378719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}