{"id":378548,"date":"2026-03-16T18:00:16","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T12:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=378548"},"modified":"2026-03-17T16:18:39","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T10:48:39","slug":"trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a matter concerning whether the trial stood vitiated due to the failure of the Sessions Court to summon and examine the authors of chemical analyser’s reports (CA reports), despite having relied extensively on them while convicting the accused, the Division Bench of Manish Pitale*<\/span> and Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ., quashed the conviction holding that a trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon as it causes a failure of justice. The Court remanded the matter to the Sessions Court for the limited purpose of summoning the experts concerned, cross-examination, and fresh recording of statements under Section 313<\/a>, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC).<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

A minor girl, aged about 6 years and 10 months, was brutally assaulted by Accused 1, causing aggravated penetrative sexual assault of extreme brutality and deep cut wounds on her throat, resulting in her death. It was also alleged that Accused 2 assisted in concealing the dead body. Following trial, the Sessions Court convicted Accused 1 under Sections 363<\/a>, 302<\/a>, 376(2)<\/a>, 376-A<\/a>, 376-AB<\/a> and 201<\/a>, Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and Sections 4<\/a> and 6<\/a>, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO Act), imposing death penalty for certain offences, while Accused 2 was sentenced to imprisonment for offences under Section 201<\/a> IPC<\/a> and Section 21<\/a>, POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The present application was filed seeking summoning of chemical analysers for cross-examination because the CA reports were directly exhibited during the examination-in-chief of the investigating officer, without summoning their authors. It was further contended that if the application was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Sessions Court, a direction ought to be issued for statement under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a> to be recorded in the context of the further evidence.<\/p>\n

The accused’s counsel highlighted that the CA reports were heavily relied upon by the Sessions Court, and there was nothing on record to show that their copies were furnished to the accused, thereby depriving the accused of the right to cross-examine crucial witnesses. The accused persons also contended that their statements under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a> were vitiated since both were jointly questioned and only the fact of receipt of CA reports was put to them, without any of the report details. It was submitted that the trial stood vitiated and that the matter must be remanded to the Sessions Court for summoning the said Assistant Chemical Analysers.<\/p>\n

It was also stated that Accused 2 was released on bail, and she had already undergone 3 years and 7 months of incarceration, despite her offences being bailable. The State accepted that the Assistant Chemical Analysers were not summoned, but this issue was not raised before the Sessions Court and that joint statements of both the accused were recorded under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court relied on Irfan<\/span> v. State of M.P<\/span>., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 359<\/a>, wherein the accused was sentenced to death based on CA reports, but the scientific experts, concerning such reports, were not summoned by the trial court. The Supreme Court remanded the matter to the trial court for examination of the scientific experts and to record the statement of the accused persons under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a>. It was observed that the case “involves capital punishment and thus, providing a fair opportunity to the accused to defend himself is absolutely imperative and non-negotiable”<\/span>. The Court also referred to State of Maharashtra<\/span> v. Sanjay Baban Katkar<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2731<\/a>, wherein it was held that the failure of the trial court in summoning the scientific experts had led to failure of justice, thereby vitiating the trial.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that even when it is found fit to set aside the trial court’s judgment and to remand the matter back to it, the trial is not directed to be conducted de novo<\/span> by wiping out the evidence that is already on record, instead, the matter is remanded only to the limited extent of examining such witnesses, concerning the CA reports with further ancillary directions. The Court noted that the Sessions Court committed a grave error in holding that since the accused did not seek examination of the chemical analysers, the reports could be directly admitted without examining them, and observed that the failure to summon these crucial witnesses led to failure of justice, thereby vitiating the trial to that extent.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that the purpose of trial is to ascertain truth and all steps in the direction of unearthing the truth must be taken by the Court, even if the prosecution is remiss in its duty and the accused at the relevant point in time has not shown awareness. The Court emphasised that from the stage of investigation, it is the authority’s duty to ensure that every bit of material is brought on record which would assist the Court in ascertaining the truth of the matter, and anything short of that would vitiate the entire process.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that Accused 1 had made out a case for remand and since the Sessions Court had questioned both the accused jointly, the entire statement under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a> must be recorded afresh. The Court further observed that Accused 2 had already undergone substantial incarceration for bailable offences and therefore released her on bail pending the completion of remand proceedings.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court quashed the Sessions Court’s judgment and remanded the matter for the limited purpose of summoning the scientific experts, cross-examination by the accused, supply of all relevant laboratory documentation, and fresh recording of statements under Section 313<\/a> CrPC<\/a>. The Court also directed the Sessions Court to complete the remand proceedings expeditiously and preferably within four months from 7 April 2026.<\/p>\n

[State of Maharashtra<\/span> v. Tejas<\/span>, 2026 SCC OnLine Bom 1870<\/a>, decided on 10-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Manish Pitale<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Appellant:<\/span> Shrikant V. Gavand, APP.<\/p>\n

For the Respondent\/Accused:<\/span> Rebecca Gonsalvez with Sahana Manjesh, Advocates.<\/p>\n

Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"protection<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The High Court examined whether reliance on CA reports, without summoning the scientific experts, affected the fairness of the trial in a case involving allegations of aggravated sexual assault and homicide<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":378558,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71045,2664,2569,100646,100647,3035,67752,100460,2572,15391,32303,75467,75469],"class_list":["post-378548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-aggravated-penetrative-sexual-assault","tag-Bail","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-chemical-analysers","tag-chemical-analysts-report","tag-death_penalty","tag-justice-manish-pitale","tag-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat","tag-Rape","tag-remand","tag-section-313-crpc","tag-section-4-pocso-act","tag-section-6-pocso-act"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC on effect of failure to examine scientific experts on trial | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-16T12:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-17T10:48:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC on effect of failure to examine scientific experts on trial | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-16T12:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-17T10:48:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"failure to examine scientific experts\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC on effect of failure to examine scientific experts on trial | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon","og_description":"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-16T12:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-17T10:48:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/","name":"Bombay HC on effect of failure to examine scientific experts on trial | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-16T12:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-17T10:48:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Bombay High Court observes that trial vitiates on failure to examine scientific experts whose reports are relied upon and remands matter back to Sessions Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"failure to examine scientific experts"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/16\/trial-vitiates-on-failure-to-examine-scientific-experts-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court | Trial vitiates on non-examination of scientific experts whose reports were relied upon"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/failure-to-examine-scientific-experts.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378197,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Program enabled the victim to approach authorities, supported by her Principal and counsellor.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"life sentence for father","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/17\/bombay-high-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-arbitration-award-for-consolidated-claims-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":1},"title":"Bombay High Court refuses to interfere with arbitration award for consolidated claims","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Concluding that the principal contention raised by the petitioner regarding consolidation of claims arising out of nine separate contracts is devoid of substance, the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition refusing to interfere with the arbitral award.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":380615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/09\/criminal-law-roundup-march-2026-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":2},"title":"Criminal Law March 2026 Roundup: Supreme Court and High Courts on Advocate Assault, Acquittal in 23-Year-old Family Murder, Misuse of POCSO in teenage relationships; and More","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"April 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories of March 2026 on Criminal Law from Supreme Court and all High Courts","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Criminal Law Roundup March 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Criminal-Law-Roundup-March-2026-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/07\/minors-consent-for-sexual-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | \u2018Consent\u2019 of minor for sexual act who conceived and delivered a baby will be immaterial","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and Manish Pitale, JJ., held that whether a minor gave her consent for sex is immaterial. Allegation in the present matter was with respect to the alleged sexual assault. Being aggrieved by the Additional Sessions Judge Order rejecting the prayer of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/bombay-hc-upholds-iprs-claim-under-copyright-act-2012-amendment-against-fm-radiobroadcasters\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":4},"title":"[IPRS v. Pvt. FM Radio Broadcasters] Bombay High Court upheld royalty rights to authors of original works in cinematograph films","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court discussed various provisions of the original Copyright Act, 1957, its 2012 amendment, Parliamentary report and relevant cases dealt by Supreme Court and High Courts relevant to the instant claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/24\/principal-seats-jurisdiction-on-establishment-of-circuit-bench-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":378548,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court explains when Principal Seat continues to retain Jurisdiction despite Establishment of a Circuit Bench","author":"Editor","date":"March 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bombay High Court held that creation of the Kolhapur Circuit Bench does not divest the Principal Seat of jurisdiction, as both the DRT (Pune) and DRAT (Mumbai) fall within its territory and the appellate order forms a substantial part of the cause of action.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"principal Seat's jurisdiction on establishment of Circuit Bench","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/principal-Seats-jurisdiction-on-establishment-of-Circuit-Bench.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/principal-Seats-jurisdiction-on-establishment-of-Circuit-Bench.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/principal-Seats-jurisdiction-on-establishment-of-Circuit-Bench.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/principal-Seats-jurisdiction-on-establishment-of-Circuit-Bench.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378548\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/378558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}