{"id":378197,"date":"2026-03-12T16:00:54","date_gmt":"2026-03-12T10:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=378197"},"modified":"2026-03-16T09:29:44","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T03:59:44","slug":"life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In an appeal challenging the life sentence imposed on a father for sexually assaulting his daughter, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manish Pitale*<\/span> and Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ., observed that the victim was proved to be a minor and her sole testimony was sterling and sufficient to convict the accused, and that medical evidence did not demolish the ocular account. The Court, while dismissing the appeal, held that if the accused is found guilty of an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">f<\/span>)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), deserving a life sentence, there is no discretion left in the Court, but to sentence him for imprisonment for the remainder of his life.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 27 July 2018, a daughter (victim) filed an FIR accusing her own father (accused) of rape, alleging that since the age of 10 years, she was touched inappropriately and that in the three months prior to her statement there were at least four incidents of sexual abuse, with the latest incident on 21 July 2018. After a &#8220;Police Didi&#8221; program in her school, she approached the police with the assistance of the Principal and counsellor. An investigation was conducted and the trial court convicted and sentenced the accused for offences under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">f<\/span>)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550531\" target=\"_blank\">9(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">n<\/span>)<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO Act), leading to the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused&#8217;s counsel submitted that the prosecution failed to prove that the victim was a minor and urged that the case was false as the victim was upset with her father regarding his decision to discontinue her studies. It was argued that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was not enough to prove the case against the accused. It was submitted that the medical evidence did not corroborate the daughter&#8217;s claims and that in the accommodation i.e. small room in which the entire family of about 7 persons were living, the incidents alleged could never have taken place. The victim contended that the incidents occurred at a wooden plank attached to the wall, but it was argued that the plank was of such a small size that the incidents could not have occurred. The evidence was not sufficient to prove that the victim was a minor at the time of alleged incidents. The ossification test showed the victim&#8217;s age could be between 17 and 18 years, and as per the settled law the upper limit is adopted, therefore, her age must be taken as 18, giving the accused the benefit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the other hand, the State submitted that detailed oral and documentary evidence proved that the victim was below 18 years, particularly the original admission register of the municipal school showing the date of birth as 15 February 2002. It was further submitted that in the statement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519590\" target=\"_blank\">313<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), the accused admitted the victim&#8217;s date of birth and that she was less than 18 years. It was urged that victim&#8217;s testimony was sterling in quality and sufficient by itself. The State contended that the victim&#8217;s alleged anger over discontinuing her studies could not justify her making such grave, serious, and scandalous allegations against her own father. Further, the medical evidence confirmed the presence of hymenal tears, and since the last alleged incident occurred on 21 July 2018 while the FIR was lodged on 27 July 2018, the delay adequately explained why the tears were old rather than fresh.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vishnu<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/svPm51U6\" target=\"_blank\">(2006) 1 SCC 283<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court observed that documents ought to be given primacy over medical reports and that the best evidence for date of birth is that of the parents. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jarnail Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Y0K04179\" target=\"_blank\">(2013) 7 SCC 263<\/a>, wherein the Rule 12, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000358975\" target=\"_blank\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007<\/a> (JJ Rules) for age determination was extended to child victims of crime along with juvenile in conflict with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rishipal Singh Solanki<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7m4Q4b18\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 8 SCC 602<\/a>, which clarified that public or official documents under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516777\" target=\"_blank\">35<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> (Evidence Act) have greater credibility than private documents and that ossification test cannot be the sole criterion for age determination and a mechanical view regarding the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination, as it is only a guiding factor. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yuvaprakash<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of T.N.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3spxP72i\" target=\"_blank\">(2024) 17 SCC 684<\/a>, which held that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\">94<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015<\/a> (JJ Act) would also apply to accused prosecuted under POCSO Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that applying Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\">94<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\">JJ Act<\/a>, documentary material must be given primacy over any medical or ossification test. The manner in which the said provision lays down the requirement of determining date of birth, makes it abundantly clear that in the first place, school records are to be given primacy and only thereafter, can an ossification test or medical test be ordered for determination of an individual&#8217;s age.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the accused had himself admitted that his daughter was a minor at the time of the incidents and that her date of birth was indeed 15 February 2002. The Court observed that the Principal of victim&#8217;s first school produced the original admission register showing the date of birth as 15 February 2002, which was a public or official document maintained in discharge of official duty, thus satisfying Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516777\" target=\"_blank\">35<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a>. The Court highlighted that, in the face of such credible documentary material and admissions, there was no necessity to rely on the medical or ossification test report and opined that the accused&#8217;s prosecution under POCSO Act was correct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the settled law is that the sole testimony of the prosecutrix is enough to return a finding of conviction, so long as the evidence of the prosecutrix inspires confidence and that minor discrepancies cannot throw out the testimony. The Court observed that the victim&#8217;s testimony was steadfast, with graphic details of the assaults, and her cross-examination could not shake her version. Regarding the argument that the sexual assaults were impossible as the house had only one room, the Court noted that the prosecution placed on record circumstances to show that there were occasions when the accused and the daughter were together in the said room.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that the evidence of the Principal of victim&#8217;s school, the counsellor who conducted &#8220;Police Didi&#8221; and the social worker who assisted her in the case, naturally explained how the victim gathered courage and reported the matter and their evidence sufficiently corroborated the victim&#8217;s version, although her sole testimony was enough to prove the accused&#8217;s guilt. The Court noted the doctor&#8217;s deposition of old hymenal tears and that a week was generally required for healing of a hymenal injury. The Court found that the medical evidence corroborated the victim&#8217;s allegations and observed that it was settled law that ocular evidence always trumps medical evidence.<\/p>\n<p>The Court found the plea of false implication due to proposed discontinuation of studies far-fetched and opined that anger about studies could not lead to such grave and scandalous allegations against one&#8217;s own father. The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhanei Prasad<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of H.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bXX300tV\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1636<\/a>, wherein it was observed that:<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;When a child is forced to suffer at the hands of her own father, the law must speak in a voice that is resolute and uncompromising. There can be no mitigation in sentencing for crimes that subvert the very notion of family as a space of security.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the accused was convicted and sentenced under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">f<\/span>)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and he was in a position of trust and authority over the victim, and hence the ingredients of the said offence were clearly made out. The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jagannath Pandurang Waghare<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/F37bv3vU\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 5256<\/a>, and observed that once it is concluded that the accused is guilty of an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">f<\/span>)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and he deserves sentence of imprisonment for life, there is no discretion left in the Court, but to sentence him for imprisonment for the remainder of his life.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court, while dismissing the appeal, held that the trial court did not commit any error in convicting and sentencing the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohammad Shahjad Amir Hasan Shaikh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G0DXm5yL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Bom 1846<\/a>, decided on 9-3-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Manish Pitale<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Accused:<\/span> Fauzan Shaikh a\/w Mohd. Munerul Shaikh, Shashank Shubham and M. B. Shaikh, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Sangita E. Phad, APP, Abhijit P. Kulkarni (appointed through legal aid) a\/w Abhishek Roy, Sweta Shah, Shreyas Zarkar and Gourav Shahane, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=5000309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=5000309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-295407\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/juvenile-justice-care-and-protection-of-children-act-2015-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">A &#8216;Police Didi&#8217; Program enabled the victim to approach authorities, supported by her Principal and counsellor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":378200,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[48083,2569,34313,42997,67752,100460,100462,45333,75761,2572,44088,32303,35079,75469,100461,6191],"class_list":["post-378197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-age-determination","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-documentary-evidence","tag-imprisonment-for-life","tag-justice-manish-pitale","tag-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat","tag-official-document","tag-ossification-test","tag-public-document","tag-Rape","tag-section-10-pocso-act","tag-section-313-crpc","tag-section-3762f-ipc","tag-section-6-pocso-act","tag-section-9n-pocso-act","tag-sexual-assault"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay High Court: Life Sentence for father in Minor&#039;s Rape case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following &#039;Police Didi&#039; Programme at School\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following &#039;Police Didi&#039; Programme at School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following &#039;Police Didi&#039; Programme at School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-12T10:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-16T03:59:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay High Court: Life Sentence for father in Minor's Rape case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-12T10:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-16T03:59:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following 'Police Didi' Programme at School\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"life sentence for father\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay High Court: Life Sentence for father in Minor's Rape case | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following 'Police Didi' Programme at School","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following 'Police Didi' Programme at School","og_description":"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following 'Police Didi' Programme at School","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-12T10:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-16T03:59:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/","name":"Bombay High Court: Life Sentence for father in Minor's Rape case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-12T10:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-16T03:59:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Bombay High Court imposes Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following 'Police Didi' Programme at School","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"life sentence for father"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/life-sentence-for-father-minor-rape-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court: Life Imprisonment for Father after Minor Reports Abuse following \u2018Police Didi\u2019 Programme at School"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/life-sentence-for-father.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/pocso-sexual-assault-minor-victim-sentence-reduced-twin-object-sentencing-policy-deterence-correction-mitigating-circumstances-bombay-high-court-legal-research-updates-criminal-trial-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Sentencing policy&#8217;s twin objective is deterrence and correction\u2019; Bombay High Court reduces POCSO convict&#8217;s sentence in a 7-year-old&#8217;s sexual assault case","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the convict was a young boy of 20 years, who has no father, and was shouldering the responsibility of his widowed sister and her son, hence, imprisonment for a term of 14 years would be adequate, to teach him a lesson.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":204682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/convict-under-section-354-a-ipc-and-section-8-pocso-acquitted-from-offence-under-section-450-ipc-as-former-not-punishable-with-imprisonment-of-life-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":1},"title":"Convict under Section 354-A IPC and Section 8 POCSO acquitted from offence under Section 450 IPC as former not punishable with imprisonment of life: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single judge Bench comprising of K.L. Wadane, J. partly allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 450 and 354-A IPC along with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2000.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/27\/5-high-courts-to-get-new-chief-justices\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":2},"title":"5 High Courts to get new Chief Justices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"KERALA HIGH COURT \u21aa Shri Justice Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti, Judge, Kerala High Court, appointed as the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT \u21aa\u00a0Shri Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Judge, Punjab & Haryana\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new chief justices of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/12\/bom-hc-pocso-convict-life-sentence-commuted-12-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC commutes POCSO convict&#8217;s life sentence to 12 years; cites his constructive participation in education and Gandhian thoughts","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe accused was only 20 years of age at the time when the offence took place, as reflected in the FIR, and was not released on bail even during Covid-19.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"POCSO convict life term commuted","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/POCSO-convict-life-term-commuted.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275612,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/14\/pulling-the-dupatta-of-a-girl-amounts-to-offence-under-s-354-ipc-bombay-special-court-directs-compensation-of-rs-15000-to-the-minor-victim\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":4},"title":"Pulling the dupatta of a girl amounts to offence under S. 354 IPC; Bombay Special Court directs compensation of Rs 15000 to the minor victim","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 POCSO Special Court, at Fort, Gr. Bombay: In a case where charge sheet is filed against the accused for offences punishable under sections 354(A), (B), 504, 506 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under section 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), Priya P.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/POCSO-Special-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/POCSO-Special-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/POCSO-Special-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/POCSO-Special-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/POCSO-Special-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295097,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/life-imprisonment-under-ipc-sec-376-greater-punishment-sec-42-pocso-act-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":378197,"position":5},"title":"Life imprisonment under Sec 376, IPC a greater punishment in accordance with Sec 42 of POCSO Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The accused father in the instant matter had allegedly committed rape on victim daughter in 2011 and 2013.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=378197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/378197\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/378200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=378197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=378197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}