{"id":377760,"date":"2026-03-09T14:00:38","date_gmt":"2026-03-09T08:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=377760"},"modified":"2026-03-10T15:57:47","modified_gmt":"2026-03-10T10:27:47","slug":"ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a suit concerning unauthorised use of copyrighted sound recordings at a ticketed Diwali event, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sharmila U. Deshmukh<\/span>, J., held that the defendant could not claim exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532762\" target=\"_blank\">52(1)<\/a>(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">za<\/span>), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a> (Copyright Act) as ticketed event are not religious ceremonies. The Court found that the plaintiff had prima facie established its rights in the sound recordings through assignment deeds and exclusive licensing arrangements, and therefore, as an exclusive licensee, was entitled to restrain unauthorised public performance. Since the defendant publicly played copyrighted sound recordings without securing a licence, the Court continued the ad interim injunction against such unlicensed public performance.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of sound recordings under assignment deeds and exclusive agreements with several music companies, with all such deeds and agreements being available on its website. It was a registered copyright society under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532732\" target=\"_blank\">33<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a> (Copyright Act) and thereafter, surrendered its registration. It was entitled to grant licences for communication to the public and public performance under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532722\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>, and since 2014, was issuing licence as the licence-holder of the copyright.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The defendant owned a cafe and rented out commercial premises for events. On 19 October 2025, a promotional poster was discovered by the plaintiff&#8217;s representative for a ticketed Diwali event titled &#8220;Bollywood Diwali Tamasha&#8221;. Despite being informed via email about the requirement of securing a licence, the defendant played copyrighted sound recordings at the event.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A cease-and-desist notice was issued on 14 November 2025. The defendant responded that the event was a private gathering exempted under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532762\" target=\"_blank\">52(1)<\/a>(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">za<\/span>), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>. The plaintiff contended that the exemption applied only to religious events, whereas this was a ticketed Diwali party. The defendant also argued that the plaintiff was not a registered copyright society. It was further submitted that on 31 December 2025, the defendant again played copyrighted sound recordings. A suit was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532774\" target=\"_blank\">60<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> in Vadodara by the defendant, but the plaintiff stated that the proceedings therein would not come in a way of grant of ad interim relief by reason of proviso to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532774\" target=\"_blank\">60<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the plaintiff&#8217;s rights in the sound recordings were <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> demonstrated from the documents appended to the plaint. The Court observed that as the exclusive licensee, the plaintiff was entitled to grant licences for public performance and opined that the defendant&#8217;s actions on 19 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 amounted to violation of copyright.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that despite a cease-and-desist notice, the defendant continued to hold events and play copyrighted sound recordings. The Court observed that the defendant&#8217;s reliance on Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532762\" target=\"_blank\">52(1)<\/a>(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">za<\/span>), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> was misplaced, as it had no application to ticketed events held in the defendant&#8217;s premises. The Court noted that the contention regarding the plaintiff not being a copyright society was clarified in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Novex Communications (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Trade Wings Hotesl Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Yy90aTY9\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 252<\/a>, where it was held that registration as a copyright society is not necessary for issuing licences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court held that a sufficient case was made out for grant of ad interim relief and issued an injunction restraining the defendant and associated persons from publicly performing or communicating the sound recordings without obtaining a licence from the plaintiff. The Court directed that the ad interim relief granted earlier would continue until the next date of hearing i.e. 1 April 2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Phonographic Performance Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yashraj Satwara<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5MG0D9ZF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Bom 1599<\/a>, decided on 27-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicant:<\/span> Amogh Singh, Asmant Nimbalkar, Anil Kumar Singh, Rahul Arora, Chanchal Bhadresha i\/b D. P. Singh<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The plaintiff was entitled to grant licences for communication to the public and public performance under Section 30, Copyright Act, and since 2014, was issuing licence as the licence-holder of the copyright.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":377761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,100155,96276,100154,66917,96277,100157,40882,100156,100158,100159],"class_list":["post-377760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-copyrighted-sound-recordings","tag-exclusive-licensee","tag-infringement-of-copyright","tag-justice-sharmila-u-deshmukh","tag-public-performance","tag-registered-copyright-society","tag-religious-ceremony","tag-section-30-copyright-act-1957","tag-section-521za-copyright-act-1957","tag-ticketed-event"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ticketed event not religious ceremony: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"headline\":\"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":624,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"copyrighted sound recordings\",\"exclusive licensee\",\"infringement of copyright\",\"Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh\",\"public performance\",\"registered copyright society\",\"Religious Ceremony\",\"Section 30 Copyright Act 1957\",\"Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act 1957\",\"ticketed event\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ticketed event not religious ceremony: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Ticketed event not religious ceremony\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/03\\\/09\\\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sunaina\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ticketed event not religious ceremony: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC","og_description":"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Sunaina","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"headline":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC","datePublished":"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/"},"wordCount":624,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp","keywords":["Bombay High Court","copyrighted sound recordings","exclusive licensee","infringement of copyright","Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh","public performance","registered copyright society","Religious Ceremony","Section 30 Copyright Act 1957","Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act 1957","ticketed event"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","name":"Ticketed event not religious ceremony: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-09T08:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-10T10:27:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Bombay High Court observes that ticketed event is not \u2018religious ceremony\u2019 and Section 52(1)(za) Copyright Act is inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings are established.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Ticketed event not religious ceremony"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/22\/bomhc-quashes-circular-exempting-music-at-wedding-from-copyright-infringement\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC quashes circular exempting performance of musical works at wedding from copyright infringement under Copyright Act 1957","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The circular dated 30-01-2024 issued by the State of Goa, does much more than just informing the public of the provision of Section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and interfered with the enforcement mechanism provided in the Act for exercise or enforcing rights of copyright societies under the Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371807,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":1},"title":"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#8217;s sound recording across 94 outlets","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe defendants are operating about 94 establishments, and continuing infringement would result in loss and damage to the plaintiff tilting the balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"PPL sound recording at 94 outlets","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/bom-hc-bars-unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":2},"title":"Bombay HC bars Legends League Cricket from unauthorised use of PPL\u2019s sound recordings in upcoming cricket matches","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe procurement of license by the respondent in the past would indicate the knowledge of the respondents that, for the purpose of communicating the plaintiff\u2019s copyrighted sound recordings, it is necessary to obtain the license from the plaintiff.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unauthorised use of sound recordings in cricket matches","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/06\/ipr-march-2026-roundup-key-high-court-judgments-on-domain-name-copyright-trade-mark-patents-and-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":3},"title":"IPR March 2026 Roundup: Key High Court Judgments on Domain Name, Copyright, Trade Mark, Patents and More","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"April 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories of March 2026 on Intellectual Property Rights from all High Courts; covering key updates on Domain name fraud, Trade mark and Copyright infringement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IPR March 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343058,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/dhc-temporarily-restrains-azure-hospitality-from-playing-phonographic-performances-copyrighted-songs-in-its-restaurants\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC temporarily restrains Azure Hospitality from playing Phonographic Performance&#8217;s copyrighted songs without license in its restaurants\/bars","author":"Arushi","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The act of the defendants of playing the sound recordings in their restaurants\/bars, for which the plaintiff holds the copyright would, on a prima facie view, amount to infringement of the plaintiff\u2019s copyright in terms of Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-interim-injunction-against-geetanjali-salon-in-copyright-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":377760,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte interim injunction against Geetanjali Salon in copyright infringement case","author":"Arunima","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff, PPL India, established a compelling case of copyright infringement against Geetanjali Salon, the defendants, with a clear imbalance of convenience favoring the plaintiff's protection of intellectual property, an interim injunction is granted to halt the defendants' unauthorized use of copyrighted materials.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=377760"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377760\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/377761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=377760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=377760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=377760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}