{"id":377286,"date":"2026-03-03T16:00:34","date_gmt":"2026-03-03T10:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=377286"},"modified":"2026-03-09T09:36:32","modified_gmt":"2026-03-09T04:06:32","slug":"del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","title":{"rendered":"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disclaimer: This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) seeking quashment of the summoning order dated 29 April 2023 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaint under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (NI Act) on the ground that the summoning order was in the nature of a &#8220;template order&#8221; and did not reflect any application of mind to the facts constituting the alleged offence, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Anup Jairam Bhambhani,* J.<\/span>, declined to interfere with the impugned summoning order under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">NI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the dispute arose from an agreement dated 1 April 2019 under which the respondent entrusted certain construction works to the petitioners and payments were to be released in accordance with agreed timelines. Subsequently, disputes surfaced regarding completion of the project and the financial adjustments between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A security bond dated 9 April 2021 was executed pursuant to which the respondent released a sum of &#8377;2,24,71,917\/- to the petitioners. Against the said amount the petitioners issued a cheque described as a &#8220;security&#8221;. The respondent, alleging further defaults in completion of the work, presented the cheque for encashment. The cheque was returned unpaid with the remark &#8220;Funds Insufficient&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, a statutory legal notice dated 29 July 2022 was issued and, upon non-payment, a complaint under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">NI Act<\/a> was filed. Cognizance was taken and summons were issued by the Magistrate and notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519506\" target=\"_blank\">251<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> was framed.<\/p>\n<h3>Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners contended that the cheque was issued merely as a security instrument under the security bond and could be presented only after written intimation of default and a 45-day cure period. Since no such intimation was given, the presentment of the cheque was contrary to the contractual stipulation. It was urged that the project stood more than 90 per cent completed and corresponding payments had already been received, and therefore, on the date of presentment there existed no &#8220;enforceable debt or liability&#8221; within the meaning of Section 138.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was contended that a principal challenge was directed against the summoning order which had been passed in a &#8220;perfunctory and mechanical manner&#8221; without prima facie examining the essential ingredients of the offence. Reliance was placed upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pepsi Foods Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Special Judicial Magistrate<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000025992\" target=\"_blank\">(1998) 5 SCC 749<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001374574\" target=\"_blank\">(2023) 1 SCC 578<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mehmood Ul Rehman<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Khazir Mohammad Tunda<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000050590\" target=\"_blank\">(2015) 12 SCC 420<\/a>, to submit that issuance of process must reflect application of mind.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the other hand, the respondent opposed the petition, submitting that the complaint ex facie disclosed the commission of an offence and that the issuance of the cheque and the signatures thereon stood admitted, thereby attracting the statutory presumption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544367\" target=\"_blank\">139<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">NI Act<\/a>. It was argued that whether the cheque was issued by way of security or towards discharge of liability was a matter of trial and could not be examined in proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>. The respondent emphasised that even a security cheque attracts Section 138 if the underlying liability subsists.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the aspect of the summoning order, it was contended that a Magistrate is only required to be satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to proceed and is not obliged to pass a detailed or reasoned order. It was also urged that the petition had been filed belatedly after framing of notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519506\" target=\"_blank\">251<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Legal Landscape<\/h3>\n<p>The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sunil Todi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Gujarat<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002250302\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 16 SCC 762<\/a>, and reiterated that the scope of inquiry at the pre-summoning stage is limited to determining whether there exists sufficient ground for proceeding and not for conviction. It referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pepsi Foods Ltd.<\/span> (Supra) where the Supreme Court emphasised on the seriousness of setting in motion the process of criminal law against a person and held that taking cognizance and issuing summons is not a mechanical process and there must be sufficient indication in the order that the Magistrate has applied his mind to the allegations and the material on record. Further, it noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">JM Laboratories<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of A.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002484739\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 208<\/a>, the Supreme Court has reiterated that a summoning order passed by a Magistrate should reflect his application of mind and held that<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a serious matter. Criminal law cannot be set into motion as a matter of course. It is not that the complainant has to bring only two witnesses to support his allegations in the complaint to have the criminal law set into motion. The order of the Magistrate summoning the accused must reflect that he has applied his mind to the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On examining the impugned order, the Court observed that the Magistrate had set out in detail the procedural steps for issuance and service of summons but had made no reference to certain essential ingredients of the offence under Section 138, such as, the reason for dishonour of the cheque, issuance and receipt of the statutory notice, and compliance with the prescribed timelines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that although it is not necessary for the Magistrate to discuss the factual matrix in detail, the order must reflect satisfaction that sufficient grounds exist for proceeding, since otherwise a court examining the validity of the order would be &#8220;bereft of any basis&#8221; to assess whether the process had been validly issued.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated the caution that summoning a person in a criminal case is a serious matter and the criminal process must not become a weapon of harassment. Notwithstanding the shortcomings in the drafting of the summoning order, the Court took note that it had itself perused the complaint, the cheque, the dishonour memo, and the statutory notice placed on record.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the light of peculiar facts of the case and bearing in mind the need for expeditious disposal of Section 138 proceedings, the Court declined to interfere with the summoning order despite the absence of discussion of the ingredients in the order. It vacated the stay granted earlier and directed the Magistrate to proceed with the complaint in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aeiforia Constructions (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Continental Carbon India (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/89mO2Hj1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Del 778<\/a>, decided on 26-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Mrinal Kumar Sharma and Mr. Veer Bhadra Singh, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioners<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Gauhar Mirza, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondent<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Issuance of summons in a criminal case is a very serious matter, since even mere issuance of summons by criminal court may stigmatise a person, who may not be required to be summonsed at all.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":377295,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,71255],"class_list":["post-377286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-anup-jairam-bhambhani"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC ruling on Summoning Order under Section 138 NI| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-03T10:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-09T04:06:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC ruling on Summoning Order under Section 138 NI| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-03T10:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-09T04:06:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC ruling on Summoning Order under Section 138 NI| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-03-03T10:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-09T04:06:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","name":"Del HC ruling on Summoning Order under Section 138 NI| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp","datePublished":"2026-03-03T10:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-09T04:06:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Delhi High Court holds that Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate but must reflect application of mind.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/27\/5-high-courts-to-get-new-chief-justices\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":0},"title":"5 High Courts to get new Chief Justices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"KERALA HIGH COURT \u21aa Shri Justice Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti, Judge, Kerala High Court, appointed as the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT \u21aa\u00a0Shri Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Judge, Punjab & Haryana\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new chief justices of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372460,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/del-hc-magistrates-power-to-discharge-at-section-251-stage\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":1},"title":"Magistrate can&#8217;t discharge accused at Section 251 CrPC stage in Summons Case after issuance of summons: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMagistrate erred in discharging the respondents of the offence under Section 452 of the Companies Act at the stage of consideration on the aspect of service of notice of accusation under Section 251 of the CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Magistrate's power to discharge at Section 251 stage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Magistrates-power-to-discharge-at-Section-251-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Magistrates-power-to-discharge-at-Section-251-stage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Magistrates-power-to-discharge-at-Section-251-stage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Magistrates-power-to-discharge-at-Section-251-stage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/why-one-should-buy-ebc-bare-acts-hear-from-legal-luminaries\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":2},"title":"Why one should buy EBC Bare Acts? Hear from Legal Luminaries","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Eastern Book Company has been a pioneer in the field of law publication and legal reporting. I thank EBC for presenting me with those valuable exhaustive bare acts today.\" Shri Kiren Rijiju, Former Law Minister of Law and Justice \u201cEBC brings the same stamp of quality to its bare acts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343943,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":3},"title":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"March 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14 of the IBC can only be obtained by a corporate debtor and not by a natural person such as the present accused, who was the Director of the corporate debtor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Quash Section 138 NI proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/17\/justice-sanjiv-khanna-cji-name-recommended-sc-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":4},"title":"Who is Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the name recommended by CJI Chandrachud as his successor?","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Sanjiv Khanna\u2019s name has been recommended as next Chief Justice of India as per the seniority rule.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CJI Chandrachud successor Justice Sanjiv Khanna","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CJI-Chandrachud-successor-Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CJI-Chandrachud-successor-Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CJI-Chandrachud-successor-Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CJI-Chandrachud-successor-Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/preliminary-inquiry-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":377286,"position":5},"title":"Preliminary Inquiry under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ayushi Raghuwanshi*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=377286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/377286\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/377295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=377286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=377286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=377286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}