{"id":376804,"date":"2026-02-26T09:00:33","date_gmt":"2026-02-26T03:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=376804"},"modified":"2026-02-25T18:32:47","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T13:02:47","slug":"no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Disclaimer:<\/span> This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> While considering a writ petition filed under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> challenging the judgment passed by Respondent 1 dismissing the information sought by the petitioner and seeking a direction to Respondent 2 to provide the same, a Single Judge Bench of Kuldeep Mathur<\/span>, J., held that employer-employee matter is not open to disclosure without overriding public interest.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had sought copies of the pay slips\/details of the salary paid to an employee of the respondent department for the period from January 2024 to March 2024 and the said information under the Right to Information Act, 2005<\/a> (RTI Act) was denied by the competent authority, on the ground that the information sought was personal in nature, pertained to a third party, and thus, exempted from disclosure under the RTI Act.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that there was no illegality or infirmity in the action of the respondents in refusing to supply the information relating to a third party. The Court referred to Girish Ramchandra Deshpande<\/span> v. CIC<\/span> (2013) 1 SCC 212<\/a> and observed that disclosure of information relating to a matter between the employee and the employer, in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus, the Court dismissed the petition at hand.<\/p>\n

[Kanta Kumawat<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, 2026 SCC OnLine Raj 718<\/a>, decided on 3-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Gopal Lal Acharya, Advocate<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the case at hand, information regarding copies of the pay slips\/details of the salary paid to an employee was sought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":376822,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[14861,54010,69020,3391,2575,34671,13821,44149],"class_list":["post-376804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-disclosure-of-information","tag-employer-employee-relationship","tag-justice-kuldeep-mathur","tag-public_interest","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-right-to-information-act-2005","tag-rti-act","tag-salary-details"],"yoast_head":"\nNo disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Raj HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-26T03:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/\",\"name\":\"No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Raj HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-26T03:30:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"disclosure of employer-employee matter\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Raj HC | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-26T03:30:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/","name":"No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Raj HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-26T03:30:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that disclosure of employer-employee matter in the absence of any overriding public interest, has no relationship with any public activity or public interest.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"disclosure of employer-employee matter"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/no-disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter-without-overriding-public-interest-raj-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Right to Information Act, 2005 | No disclosure of employer-employee matter without overriding public interest: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disclosure-of-employer-employee-matter.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/03\/del-hc-does-disclosure-of-information-with-no-larger-public-interest-amounts-to-invasion-of-privacy-under-s-81j-of-rti-act-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Does disclosure of information with no larger public interest amounts to invasion of privacy under S. 8(1)(j) of RTI Act? HC elucidates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula, JJ., held that the attendance record is a part of service record which is a matter between the employee and employer governed by the service rules and come under the category of \u201cpersonal information\u201d. Present appeal is directed against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254719,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/25\/the-question-is-of-trust-no-matter-how-trivial-the-case-suppression-of-fact-of-conviction-can-lead-to-termination-from-service-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":1},"title":"“The question is of trust”. No matter how trivial the case, suppression of fact of conviction can lead to termination from service: Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"When a candidate suppresses material information and\/or gives false information, the choice\/option whether to continue or not to continue such an employee always must be given to the employer.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/sc-5-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/sc-5-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/sc-5-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/sc-5-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/sc-5-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379079,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/23\/allahabad-hc-disclosure-of-photocopies-of-other-candidates-answer-sheets-rti\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court: Marks in Recruitment Exams disclosable under RTI, not Photocopies of other candidates\u2019 answer sheets","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"March 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court clarifies what constitutes \u201cpublic activity\u201d in exam-related disclosures while drawing limits on access to confidential material like answer sheets.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"disclosure of Photocopies of other candidates' answer sheets","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disclosure-of-Photocopies-of-other-candidates-answer-sheets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disclosure-of-Photocopies-of-other-candidates-answer-sheets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disclosure-of-Photocopies-of-other-candidates-answer-sheets.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/disclosure-of-Photocopies-of-other-candidates-answer-sheets.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/05\/raj-hc-deprivation-of-livelihood-violates-article-21-employer-must-circumspect-before-taking-it-away-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":3},"title":"Deprivation of livelihood violates Article 21 of Constitution; employer must circumspect before taking away livelihood on stigmatic grounds: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven otherwise, trite law it is in service jurisprudence that a stigmatic order passed on ground of alleged misconduct cannot be sustained unless a proper enquiry in accordance with law has been conducted.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/26\/existence-of-an-employer-employee-relationship-is-a-sine-qua-non-for-protection-under-section-33-of-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":4},"title":"Existence of an \u2018employer-employee\u2019 relationship is a sine qua non for protection under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.C. Gupte, J. allowed a writ petition filed by \u2018IDBI Bank Ltd.\u2019 and dismissed the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (Mumbai) passed in an application preferred by the respondent- workers union under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/characterizing-it-as-sketchy-and-non-speaking-rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-the-order-of-the-joint-commissioner-gst\/","url_meta":{"origin":376804,"position":5},"title":"Characterising it as \u2018sketchy’ and \u2018non-speaking’, Rajasthan High Court sets aside the order of the Joint Commissioner, GST","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376804\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/376822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}