{"id":37671,"date":"2016-02-29T13:56:17","date_gmt":"2016-02-29T08:26:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=37671"},"modified":"2016-05-11T18:16:45","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T12:46:45","slug":"denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/","title":{"rendered":"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court: <\/strong>Deciding upon the issue as to whether the State Government was justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of affected\/displaced family (land oustee) from consideration for employment under the Chhattisgarh State Model Rehabilitation Policy, 2007 on the ground of her marriage, the Court held that such denial of employment, included in the rehabilitation, to a married daughter is gender-biased, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 15 as well as Article 21, as rehabilitation of a\u00a0 land oustee is a logical corollary of Article 21. The Court further observed that marriage is a social circumstance and basic civil right of man and woman and marriage by itself is not a disqualification. A daughter remains a daughter after her marriage and does not cease to be a daughter of her father or mother.<\/p>\n

The petitioner’s application for employment after her father’s land was subject to acquisition by the government, was rejected on the ground that as per the R&R Policy, a married daughter was not included within the purview of affected family and hence not entitled for employment as a matter of right. \u00a0Quashing the impunged order,\u00a0 clause 2.1(c) of the 2007 Rehabilitation Policy regarding employment was held to be discriminatory to the extent of excluding married daughers, and declared void and inoperative. The Court observed that members of affected families are entitled for resettlement and rehabilitation as per the government policy, and as such the policy framed should be just, fair, reasonable and consistent with the provisions of the Constitution, particularly Articles 14 and 15. [Sadhna Bai<\/em> v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine Chh 299<\/a>, decided on January 21, 2016]<\/p>\n

To read the Order, Click HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court: Deciding upon the issue as to whether the State Government was justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of affected\/displaced <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nDenial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court: Deciding upon the issue as to whether the State Government was justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of affected\/displaced\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-29T08:26:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T12:46:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/\",\"name\":\"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-29T08:26:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T12:46:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Deciding upon the issue as to whether the State Government was justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of affected\/displaced","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-02-29T08:26:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T12:46:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/","name":"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-02-29T08:26:17+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T12:46:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/29\/denial-of-benefit-of-rehabilitation-including-employment-to-a-married-daughter-of-affected-family-violative-of-articles-14-15-21\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Denial of benefit of rehabilitation (including employment) to a married daughter of affected family, violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":316098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/dismissal-of-married-daughter-for-compassionate-appointment-is-arbitrary-orissa-hc-reiterates-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":0},"title":"Dismissal of married daughter\u2019s candidacy for compassionate appointment is arbitrary and violative of Constitution: Orissa HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The policy of the State Government which disqualifies a 'married' daughter and excludes her from consideration for compassionate appointment, apart from being arbitrary and discriminating, is a retrograde step.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/17\/excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-art-14-15-and-16-rajasthan-high-court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":1},"title":"Excluding married daughters from compassionate appointment violative of Art. 14, 15 and 16; Rajasthan High Court overrules judgments supporting exclusion","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Yardstick, for extending the benefit of compassionate Appointment should be dependency of the dependents on the deceased government servant and, therefore, their marital status only should not be an impediment for consideration on compassionate ground.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/08\/no-resettlement-claim-if-name-missing-panchayat-parivar-register-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":2},"title":"No rehabilitation benefits without entry in Panchayat Parivar Register at the time of acquisition: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme was for the benefit of only those who were permanently residing in the area and who were to be rendered houseless and landless on account of acquisition proceedings for the purpose of construction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Resettlement claim Panchayat Parivar Register","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Resettlement-claim-Panchayat-Parivar-Register.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Resettlement-claim-Panchayat-Parivar-Register.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Resettlement-claim-Panchayat-Parivar-Register.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Resettlement-claim-Panchayat-Parivar-Register.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/19\/married-daughter-of-a-deceased-government-employee-is-eligible-for-compassionate-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":3},"title":"Married daughter of a deceased Government employee is eligible for compassionate appointment","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 19, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While deciding the question that whether a married daughter of a deceased Government employee is eligible for compassionate appointment, the Court observed that there cannot be any discrimination between a married son and a married daughter and making such discrimination on grounds of marriage is arbitrary and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-whether-a-daughter-upon-marriage-ceases-to-be-a-part-of-the-family-for-the-purpose-of-seeking-compassionate-appointment-against-her-deceased-father-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Whether a daughter upon marriage ceases to be a part of the family for the purpose of seeking compassionate appointment against her deceased father; HC elucidates","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Sureshwar Thakur and Chander Bhusan Barowalia JJ., while allowing the present petition said, \u201cMarriage neither alters the relationship between the married daughters with her parents nor creates severance of a relationship. A son remains a son and his marriage does not alter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/karnataka-high-court-guideline-excluding-married-daughter-issuance-of-i-cards-dependants-ex-servicemen-violative-art-14-legal-updates-legal-news-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":37671,"position":5},"title":"Guideline excluding married daughter for issuance of I-cards to dependants of ex-servicemen, held violative of Art. 14; Karnataka High Court struck down the words \u201ctill married\u201d from the impugned policy","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In an impassioned ruling, the single Judge Bench of the Karnataka High Court observed that the word \u201cmen\u201d in the impugned Guideline perpetrates gender bias and misogyny and urged that there is an imperative need of change of nomenclature from \u2018ex-servicemen\u2019 to that of \u2018ex-service personnel\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-424.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37671\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}