{"id":376256,"date":"2026-02-20T16:00:14","date_gmt":"2026-02-20T10:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=376256"},"modified":"2026-02-21T13:17:54","modified_gmt":"2026-02-21T07:47:54","slug":"sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In Special Leave Petition (SLP), challenging the rejection of application for condonation of 11 years of delay, filed with further delay of 123 days in filing and 96 days in re-filing after curing defects, a Division Bench of Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ., held that “condonation of delay cannot be claimed as a matter of right. It is entirely the discretion of the Court whether or not to condone delay.”<\/span> The Court emphasised that despite the latitude shown to the State, no case for exercise of discretion had been made out. Consequently, it rejected the applications for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the SLP and dismissed the SLP as time-barred.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the respondent, Managing Committee, approached the State Education Tribunal, Bhubaneswar under Section 24-B of the Odisha Education Act, 1969 seeking release of grant-in-aid. The Tribunal, vide order dated 30-12-2013, allowed the application and directed the State to release grant-in-aid to the teaching and non-teaching staff.<\/p>\n

The State preferred first appeal from order before the Orissa High Court on 16-10-2015, but the appeal was time-barred and was not accompanied by the certified copy of the impugned order. For eight years, the defect was not cured. The High Court dismissed the appeal on 26-04-2023 for failure to file the certified copy.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, the State obtained the certified copy only on 13-02-2024 and filed an application for recall, and an application for condonation of 291 days’ delay. The High Court held that the appeal was inherently defective and that the delay exceeded 11 years and consequently rejected the condonation application vide order dated 21-02-2025.<\/p>\n

The State then filed the present SLP with 123 days’ delay in filing and 96 days’ delay in re-filing. The explanation offered for the delay was that the matter had to be processed through official channels and approval from the higher authorities was required, and that the delay was procedural and not deliberate and intentional. The State further relied on the long line of precedents advocating a liberal approach in condonation of delay when the applicant is the Government.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that “no cause, much less sufficient cause, has been shown for exercise of discretion in favour of the State of Odisha”<\/span> and the explanation for delay is such that “with much ado, the proceedings could be closed.”<\/span> The Court stated that “sufficient cause” under Section 5<\/a> of the Limitation Act, 1963<\/a> is elastic and intended to advance substantial justice.<\/p>\n

The Court undertook an extensive survey of the case law on condonation of delay and noted the shift from the earlier justice-oriented liberal approach to a stricter standard. The Court traced the evolution from the liberal approach adopted in Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Mst. Katiji<\/span>, (1987) 2 SCC 107<\/a> and G. Ramegowda v. Land Acquisition Officer<\/span>, (1988) 2 SCC 142<\/a>, where it was emphasised that when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred and that governmental functioning, encumbered by procedural red tape, may justify a certain latitude. It was noted that governmental decision-making is proverbially slow and “a little play at the joints” should be allowed.<\/p>\n

However, The Court noted that later decisions including Postmaster General<\/span> v. Living Media India Ltd.<\/span>, (2012) 3 SCC 563<\/a>; University of Delhi<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (2020) 13 SCC 745<\/a> and Pathapati Subba Reddy<\/span> v. Collector (LA)<\/span>, (2024) 12 SCC 336<\/a>, adopted a stricter approach and emphasised that limitation is founded on public policy and that merits are irrelevant at the stage of condonation.<\/p>\n

The Court further referred to Commissioner of Wealth Tax<\/span> v. Amateur Riders Club<\/span>, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 603<\/a>, where it was lamented that “there is a point beyond which even the courts cannot help a litigant … under the shackles of bureaucratic indifference.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Applying these principles, the Court found the State had been “utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent”<\/span> both before the High Court and before the Supreme Court. It was noted that the explanation offered was stereotyped, reflecting only procedural movement of files and also the cause shown was not an explanation but a lame excuse.<\/p>\n

The Court held that condonation of delay cannot be claimed as a matter of right and is entirely discretionary. The Court emphasised that despite the latitude shown to the State, no case for exercise of discretion had been made out.<\/p>\n

“Condonation of delay cannot be claimed as a matter of right. It is entirely the discretion of the Court whether or not to condone delay.”<\/p>\n

The Court rejected the applications for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the SLP.<\/p>\n

Consequently, it dismissed the SLP as time-barred.<\/p>\n

[State of Odisha v. Managing Committee of Namatara Girls High School, 2026 SCC OnLine SC 191<\/a>, Decided on 09-02-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Ms. Sanjana Saddy, AOR, Ms. Shailja Singh, Adv., Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n

Mr. Nagendra Kasana, AOR, Mr. Mahendra Kumar Sahoo, Adv., Mr. A Deb Kumar, Adv., Mrs. A Deepa, Adv., Mrs. Neeta Kasana, Adv., Mrs. Anjana Kasana, Adv., Mr. Binod Ch Sabat, Adv., Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Despite all the latitude that is shown to a “State”, we are of the clear opinion that 10 the cause sought to be shown here by the State of Odisha is not an explanation but a lame excuse. No case for exercise of discretion has been set up.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":376268,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[87266,2552,70427,40866,44666,99169,99167,3655,24144,99168,45030,99170,61525,99164,32319,5363,99166,99165],"class_list":["post-376256","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bureaucratic-delay","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-government-litigation","tag-justice-dipankar-datta","tag-justice-satish-chandra-sharma","tag-katiji-case","tag-liberal-vs-strict-approach","tag-limitation","tag-limitation-act","tag-living-media-principle","tag-procedural-delay","tag-public-policy-limitation","tag-section-5","tag-state-as-litigant","tag-sufficient-cause","tag-supreme-court","tag-supreme-court-2026","tag-time-barred-slp"],"yoast_head":"\nSC rejects Condonation of delay in government litigation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":845,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bureaucratic Delay\",\"Condonation of delay\",\"Government Litigation\",\"Justice Dipankar Datta\",\"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\",\"Katiji case\",\"liberal vs strict approach\",\"limitation\",\"Limitation Act\",\"Living Media principle\",\"Procedural Delay\",\"public policy limitation\",\"Section 5\",\"State as litigant\",\"Sufficient Cause\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Supreme Court 2026\",\"time-barred SLP\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC rejects Condonation of delay in government litigation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Condonation of delay in government litigation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/20\\\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC rejects Condonation of delay in government litigation | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019","og_description":"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019","datePublished":"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/"},"wordCount":845,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp","keywords":["Bureaucratic Delay","Condonation of delay","Government Litigation","Justice Dipankar Datta","Justice Satish Chandra Sharma","Katiji case","liberal vs strict approach","limitation","Limitation Act","Living Media principle","Procedural Delay","public policy limitation","Section 5","State as litigant","Sufficient Cause","Supreme Court","Supreme Court 2026","time-barred SLP"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/","name":"SC rejects Condonation of delay in government litigation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-20T10:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-21T07:47:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Supreme Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in government litigation and held that bureaucratic procedure no \u201csufficient cause\u201d.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Condonation of delay in government litigation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/sc-rejects-condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bureaucratic Delay no Ground for Condonation; Supreme Court dismisses SLP as time-barred for State being \u2018utterly lethargic, tardy and indolent\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Condonation-of-delay-in-government-litigation.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376256\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/376268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}