{"id":375995,"date":"2026-02-18T12:30:03","date_gmt":"2026-02-18T07:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375995"},"modified":"2026-02-23T09:25:16","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T03:55:16","slug":"mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Disclaimer:<\/span> This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a criminal revision filed by a husband against the Trial Court’s order directing him to pay maintenance to his wife, the Single Judge Bench of Madan Pal Singh, J., dismissed the revision, reiterating that mere employment or earning of the wife is, by itself, not a ground to deny maintenance. The Court held that the maintenance awarded by the Trial Court appeared to be just, reasonable, and commensurate with the status and earning capacity of the husband.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The wife filed an application under Section 125<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (“CrPC”), seeking maintenance from her husband. The Trial Court directed the husband to pay Rs 15,000 per month to the wife from the date of the application. Aggrieved, he filed the present criminal revision.<\/p>\n

The husband contended that the wife was an educated working woman and financially independent with an annual salary of Rs 11.28 Lakhs. He further stated that the wife had voluntarily left the matrimonial home, was unwilling to discharge her matrimonial obligations, and refused to reside with his old parents. He claimed that he was compelled to leave his employment to take care of his ailing parents and was burdened with financial liabilities, thereby lacking sufficient means to pay the maintenance awarded.<\/p>\n

The wife contended that the husband had admitted before the Trial Court that he was employed with J.P. Morgan from April 2018 to 2020, drawing an annual package of Rs. 40 lakhs per annum.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/h3>\n

Upon perusal of the income documents relied upon by the parties, the Court noted that the husband was previously drawing a substantially high annual remuneration, and he was not able to satisfactorily explain the said material or place any cogent evidence on record to demonstrate a commensurate reduction in his earning capacity.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that even if it were to be assumed that the wife had some source of income, the material available on record clearly reflected a substantial disparity in the earning capacity and financial status of the parties. Furthermore, the income attributed to the wife, as reflected from the documents relied upon by the husband, could not be said to be sufficient to enable her to maintain the same standard of living to which she was accustomed during her matrimonial life.<\/p>\n

Regarding the husband’s assertions of alleged financial constraints and liabilities, the Court held that these were bald assertions as no convincing or reliable material was placed on record to establish that the husband lacked sufficient means to relieve him of his statutory obligation to maintain his wife.<\/p>\n

“The Court is unable to accept the submission that mere employment or earning of the wife is, by itself, a ground to deny maintenance. The object of Section 125<\/a> CrPC<\/a> is not merely to prevent destitution, but to ensure that the wife is able to live with dignity, consistent with the status of the husband.”<\/p>\n

In this regard, the Court relied on the settled legal position laid down by the Supreme Court in Shailja v. Khobbanna<\/span>, (2018) 12 SCC 199<\/a>, wherein the Court held that mere earning of the wife does not disentitle her from maintenance; the decisive test is whether such income is sufficient to enable her to maintain the same standard of living as enjoyed in the matrimonial home. The said principle was reiterated in Rajnesh v. Neha<\/span>, (2021) 2 SCC 324<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Based on the aforesaid legal principles and the material available on record, the Court held that the maintenance awarded by the Trial Court appeared to be just, reasonable, and commensurate with the status and earning capacity of the husband. The Court further held that the impugned order did not suffer from any perversity, illegality, or material irregularity warranting interference in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

[Ravinder Singh Bisht v. State of U.P., 2026 SCC OnLine All 363<\/a>, decided on 05-02-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span> Advocates Nitin Sharma, Parmeshwar Yadav<\/p>\n

For the respondent:<\/span> Ravindra Kumar Mishra and Additional Government Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The Court is unable to accept the submission that mere employment or earning of the wife is, by itself, a ground to deny maintenance. The object of Section 125 CrPC is not merely to prevent destitution, but to ensure that the wife is able to live with dignity, consistent with the status of the husband.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":375996,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,99004,51811,99005,99007,99006,90182,2863,43969,4351,12531],"class_list":["post-375995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-amount-of-maintenance","tag-criminal-revision","tag-denial-of-maintenance","tag-equal-living-standard-of-wife","tag-ground-to-deny-maintenance","tag-justice-madan-pal-singh","tag-maintenance","tag-maintenance-of-wife","tag-revisional-jurisdiction","tag-section-125-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nMere employment of wife not ground to deny maintenance: All HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-18T07:00:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-23T03:55:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Mere employment of wife not ground to deny maintenance: All HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-18T07:00:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-23T03:55:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"ground to deny maintenance\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere employment of wife not ground to deny maintenance: All HC | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court","og_description":"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-18T07:00:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-23T03:55:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/","name":"Mere employment of wife not ground to deny maintenance: All HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-18T07:00:03+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-23T03:55:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Allahabad HC denies relief to husband holding that mere employment or earning of wife by itself is not a ground to deny maintenance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"ground to deny maintenance"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/mere-employment-of-wife-not-ground-to-deny-maintenance-all-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Employment or earning of wife alone not a ground to deny maintenance: Allahabad High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ground-to-deny-maintenance.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":218440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/21\/del-hc-qualification-of-wife-and-capacity-to-earn-cannot-be-ground-to-deny-her-interim-maintenance-if-she-is-without-source-of-income\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Qualification of wife and capacity to earn cannot be ground to deny her interim maintenance if she is without source of income","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the order of the Appellate Court whereby her appeal against the trial court order rejecting the\u00a0application for grant of interim maintenance was dismissed. The petitioner had filed an application under Protection of Women from Domestic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292607,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/19\/trial-court-can-grant-maintenance-from-the-date-of-the-order-allahabad-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":1},"title":"Can the Trial Court grant maintenance from the date of the order in view of Rajnesh vs. Neha case? Allahabad High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Trial Court is not barred from granting maintenance from the date of the order if there are circumstances and reasons for doing the same","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/many-a-times-wives-sacrifice-their-career-only-for-family\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":2},"title":"\u201cMany a times wives sacrifice their career only for family\u201d Can interim maintenance be denied if wife is capable of earning? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to maintenance to wife, Subramonium Prasad, J., held that the fact that the wife is capable of earning is no ground to deny interim maintenance to her. Many a times wives sacrifice their career only for the family. Instant petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/29\/ker-hc-efforts-of-wife-to-maintain-herself-after-desertion-is-no-ground-to-deny-payment-of-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Efforts of wife to maintain herself after desertion is no ground to deny payment of maintenance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Alexander Thomas, J. while hearing a revision petition, remitted a matrimonial case to the Family Court, Kalpetta for consideration and disposal afresh, after hearing both the parties. Revision petitioner herein sought maintenance in Family Court, Kalpetta, from the respondent-husband. She was aggrieved by the judgment that dismissed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267723,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance","author":"Editor","date":"June 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati J. modified the impugned order and enhanced the compensation to Rs 75000\/- (for wife) and Rs 25000\/- (for son). The facts of the case are such that the marriage was solemnized and a son was born out of the said wedlock. It was further\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":277045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/09\/maintenance-of-wife-and-children-income-tax-returns-not-accurate-to-determine-real-income-family-court-must-determine-husbands-real-income-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":375995,"position":5},"title":"Maintenance of wife and children| Income Tax returns not accurate to determine real income; Family Court must determine husband’s real income: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: While deciding a case filed under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), in which the appeal was arising from a Single Judge of High Court of Allahabad (High Court), the Division Bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli, JJ. thought it appropriate to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-220-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-220-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-220-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-220-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-220-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375995\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375996"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}